Adaptive Decision Rules for the Acquisition of Nature Reserves

Although reserve-design algorithms have shown promise for increasing the efficiency of conservation planning, recent work casts doubt on the usefulness of some of these approaches in practice. Using three data sets that vary widely in size and complexity, we compared various decision rules for acquiring reserve networks over multiyear periods. We explored three factors that are often important in real-world conservation efforts: uncertain availability of sites for acquisition, degradation of sites, and overall budget constraints. We evaluated the relative strengths and weaknesses of existing optimal and heuristic decision rules and developed a new set of adaptive decision rules that combine the strengths of existing optimal and heuristic approaches. All three of the new adaptive rules performed better than the existing rules we tested under virtually all scenarios of site availability, site degradation, and budget constraints. Moreover, the adaptive rules required no additional data beyond what was readily available and were relatively easy to compute.

[1]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Sensitivity of Systematic Reserve Selection to Decisions about Scale, Biological Data, and Targets: Case Study from Southern British Columbia , 2004 .

[2]  John Hof,et al.  Spatial optimization for wildlife and timber in managed forest ecosystems , 1992 .

[3]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Is maximizing protection the same as minimizing loss? Efficiency and retention as alternative measures of the effectiveness of proposed reserves , 2004 .

[4]  Andrew R. Solow,et al.  Choosing reserve networks with incomplete species information , 2000 .

[5]  Andrew R. Solow,et al.  A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection , 1996 .

[6]  Mark D. McDonnell,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Spatially Cohesive Reserve Design , 2002 .

[7]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Efficiency in conservation evaluation: Scoring versus iterative approaches , 1989 .

[8]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Site‐Selection Algorithms and Habitat Loss , 2003 .

[9]  Charles ReVelle,et al.  Using mathematical optimization models to design nature reserves , 2004 .

[10]  K. D. Cocks,et al.  Using mathematical programming to address the multiple reserve selection problem: An example from the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia , 1989 .

[11]  W. Turner Citywide biological monitoring as a tool for ecology and conservation in urban landscapes: the case of the Tucson Bird Count , 2003 .

[12]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much? , 1996 .

[13]  Jamie B. Kirkpatrick,et al.  An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: An example from Tasmania , 1983 .

[14]  S. Polasky,et al.  Dynamic reserve site selection , 2004 .

[15]  Manuela M. P. Huso,et al.  A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon , 1997 .

[16]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation , 1998, Science.

[17]  Daniel P. Faith,et al.  Complementarity, biodiversity viability analysis, and policy-based algorithms for conservation , 2003 .

[18]  Les G. Underhill,et al.  Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms , 1994 .

[19]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world , 2004 .

[20]  I. R. Johnson,et al.  Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal , 1994, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[21]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement , 2000 .

[22]  M. Drechsler Probabilistic approaches to scheduling reserve selection , 2005 .

[23]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[24]  S. Andelman,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks , 2000 .

[25]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity , 1988 .

[26]  Harry John Betteley Birks,et al.  How to maximize biological diversity in nature reserve selection: Vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous woodlands, western Norway , 1993 .

[27]  David A. Newburn,et al.  Economics and Land‐Use Change in Prioritizing Private Land Conservation , 2005 .

[28]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Economic Reasons for Conserving Wild Nature , 2002, Science.

[29]  H. Possingham,et al.  The mathematics of designing a network of protected areas for conservation , 1993 .

[30]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation loss , 2001 .