Detection of mechanical injury of articular cartilage using contrast enhanced computed tomography.

OBJECTIVE Osteoarthritic degeneration may be initiated by mechanical overloading of articular cartilage. Mechanical injury increases the permeability of tissue, thereby probably affecting the diffusion of contrast agents in articular cartilage. We investigated whether it is possible to detect acute cartilage injury by measuring contrast agent diffusion into articular cartilage using contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT). METHODS Osteochondral plugs (Ø=6.0 mm, n=36) were prepared from intact bovine patellae (n=9). Two of the adjacent samples were injured by impact loading, using a drop tower, while the others served as paired controls. The samples were imaged before immersion in contrast agent solution [ioxaglate (Hexabrix™) or sodium iodide (NaI)] and 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20 and 25 h after immersion using a MicroCT-instrument. Contrast agent content, diffusion coefficient and diffusion flux were determined for each sample. RESULTS Already after 1 h the penetration of contrast agents into cartilage was significantly (P<0.05) greater in the injured samples. The diffusion coefficient was not altered by the injury, which suggests that reaching the diffusion equilibrium takes the same time in injured and intact cartilage. However, the diffusion flux of ioxaglate through the articular surface was significantly higher in injured samples at 30-60 min after immersion. CONCLUSIONS To conclude, CECT could diagnose articular cartilage injuries, and determination of the diffusion flux of ioxaglate helped to detect tissue injury without waiting for the diffusion equilibrium. These results are encouraging, however, in vivo application of CECT is challenging and systematic further studies are needed to reveal its clinical potential.

[1]  T. Quinn,et al.  Solute diffusivity correlates with mechanical properties and matrix density of compressed articular cartilage. , 2005, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[2]  R. Aspden,et al.  Impact testing to determine the mechanical properties of articular cartilage in isolation and on bone , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[3]  Carl Johan Tiderius,et al.  Association between findings on delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage and future knee osteoarthritis. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  N. Blumenkrantz,et al.  New method for quantitative determination of uronic acids. , 1973, Analytical biochemistry.

[5]  D. Burstein,et al.  Glycosaminoglycan in articular cartilage: in vivo assessment with delayed Gd(DTPA)(2-)-enhanced MR imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[6]  David E. Schwartz,et al.  Quantitative analysis of collagen, protein and DNA in fixed, paraffin-embedded and sectioned tissue , 1985, The Histochemical Journal.

[7]  Beat Hintermann,et al.  Posttraumatic Ankle Osteoarthritis After Ankle-Related Fractures , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[8]  R. Haut,et al.  Rate of blunt impact loading affects changes in retropatellar cartilage and underlying bone in the rabbit patella. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Juha Töyräs,et al.  Spatial assessment of articular cartilage proteoglycans with Gd‐DTPA‐enhanced T1 imaging , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  John Crank,et al.  The Mathematics Of Diffusion , 1956 .

[11]  J. E. Jeffrey,et al.  Matrix damage and chondrocyte viability following a single impact load on articular cartilage. , 1995, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[12]  A. Maroudas,et al.  Biophysical chemistry of cartilaginous tissues with special reference to solute and fluid transport. , 1975, Biorheology.

[13]  Thomas D Brown,et al.  Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis: A First Estimate of Incidence, Prevalence, and Burden of Disease , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[14]  Deborah Burstein,et al.  Relaxivity and diffusion of gadolinium agents in cartilage , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  P. A. Torzilli,et al.  Effects of temperature, concentration and articular surface removal on transient solute diffusion in articular cartilage , 1993, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[16]  H. Weinans,et al.  In vivo imaging of cartilage degeneration using microCT-arthrography. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[17]  H. Kokkonen,et al.  Diffusion and near-equilibrium distribution of MRI and CT contrast agents in articular cartilage , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  A. Maroudas,et al.  Physicochemical properties of cartilage in the light of ion exchange theory. , 1968, Biophysical journal.

[19]  R. Katzberg,et al.  Epinephrine enhanced knee arthrography. , 1978, Investigative radiology.

[20]  T. Dufresne,et al.  Quantitative imaging of proteoglycan in cartilage using a gadolinium probe and microCT. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[21]  M J Lammi,et al.  Contrast agent enhanced pQCT of articular cartilage , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Carl Johan Tiderius,et al.  Delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) in early knee osteoarthritis , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  P. Torzilli,et al.  Diffusive properties of immature articular cartilage. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[24]  R K Korhonen,et al.  Diffusion coefficients of articular cartilage for different CT and MRI contrast agents. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[25]  Matthew J Silva,et al.  Cartilage Tolerates Single Impact Loads of as Much as Half the Joint Fracture Threshold , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  G. Barton.  The Mathematics of Diffusion 2nd edn , 1975 .

[27]  M. Brittberg,et al.  Evaluation of Cartilage Injuries and Repair , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  P. Torzilli,et al.  Transient solute diffusion in articular cartilage. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  T. Quinn,et al.  Dynamic compression augments interstitial transport of a glucose-like solute in articular cartilage. , 2006, Biophysical journal.