Integration of Non-synchronous Generation - Frequency Dynamics

Traditionally the predominant generation has been large synchronous generators providing the system inertia. Nowadays when wind power and other non-synchronously connected units displaces this synchronous generation, the system inertia is reduced. Hence higher rate of change of frequency and larger frequency deviations are expected. This thesis deals with the impact on rate of change of frequency and frequency deviation in the Nordic power system with decreasing system inertia as well as with the introduction of synthetic inertia and frequency support from wind turbines. Increasing wind power is a question of system inertia, governor frequency response, load frequency response and magnitude of disturbance rather than the amount of wind power in the system. As long as the system inertia is maintained at an acceptable level, the wind power production can be arbitrarily selected. A synthetic inertia controller acting on df/dt calculated from a slight filtered frequency gives a frequency response similar to that for a synchronous generator. Further, it can damp the electromechanical oscillations between (groups of) generators in the system, provided that the turbine can handle a few periods of oscillations which are reflected in the output power. If measured frequency is filtered heavier prior to calculating df/dt the controller does not act on the oscillations. The wind turbine response is also delayed which is preferable as the hydropower reacts faster and the frequency deviation is reduced. A frequency support controller acting on Δf is best used in combination with curtailed wind turbine output power. A predictable frequency response is obtained which can be handled similar to frequency response from traditional generation. The Δf-controller is also possible to use without curtailment but the tuning of it is very critical, especially in a system with high level of wind power. If this controller is not handled with great caution it may be devastating to the frequency dynamics. The entire power system has to be considered to verify wind turbine behavior in combination with already existing turbine governors. Otherwise an attempt to improve frequency dynamics can end up with worse frequency dynamics than without any control on wind power. The amount of induction generators in the system is also likely to increase. It is shown that the synchronous and induction generator capability of delivering power to the grid during a frequency disturbance is almost solely determined by the generator and turbine mechanical system, i.e. the amount of inertia. Introducing new types of production with induction generators may affect the frequency dynamics due to a change in inertia but this is not directly related to the type of generator.

[1]  T. Thiringer,et al.  Temporary Primary Frequency Control Support by Variable Speed Wind Turbines— Potential and Applications , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Philip Carne Kjaer,et al.  Regulation and frequency response service capability of modern wind power plants , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[3]  R. Watson,et al.  Frequency Response Capability of Full Converter Wind Turbine Generators in Comparison to Conventional Generation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Poul Ejnar Sørensen,et al.  Simulation of the impact of wind power on the transient fault behavior of the Nordic power system , 2007 .

[5]  Poul Ejnar Sørensen,et al.  Grid support of a wind farm with active stall wind turbines and AC grid connection , 2006 .

[6]  Nicholas Jenkins,et al.  Frequency support from doubly fed induction generator wind turbines , 2007 .

[7]  E. Peterson Wind Power , 1974, Science.

[8]  Seyed M. Madani,et al.  A new method for contribution of DFIG-based wind farms in power system frequency regulation , 2010, North American Power Symposium 2010.

[9]  J.A. Ferreira,et al.  Wind turbines emulating inertia and supporting primary frequency control , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Emmanouil Loukarakis Probabilistic assessment of wind generation effects on primary frequency response , 2011, 2011 IEEE Trondheim PowerTech.

[11]  Jacob Ostergaard,et al.  Variable speed wind turbines capability for temporary over-production , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[12]  Kjetil Uhlen,et al.  Large‐scale wind power integration in Norway and impact on damping in the Nordic grid , 2005 .

[13]  W. L. Peterson,et al.  Adaptive estimation of power system frequency deviation and its rate of change for calculating sudden power system overloads , 1990 .

[14]  Jan Pierik,et al.  Inertial response of variable speed wind turbines , 2006 .

[15]  K. Clark,et al.  Frequency responsive wind plant controls: Impacts on grid performance , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[16]  A. Mullane,et al.  Frequency control and wind turbine technologies , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Noel Aubut,et al.  Wind farm inertia emulation to fulfill Hydro-Québec's specific need , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[18]  Sven Granfors Online testing of generating units on their ability to regulate frequency during restoration of an islanded grid , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[19]  Thyge Knüppel,et al.  Frequency Activated Fast Power Reserve for Wind Power Plant Delivered from Stored Kinetic Energy in the Wind Turbine Inertia , 2011 .