Invited Article: The Construct of Suspicion and How It Can Benefit Theories and Models in Organizational Science

This article introduces the construct of suspicion to researchers in business and applied psychology, provides a literature-based definition of state suspicion and an initial self-report measure of that construct, and encourages research on this important topic. The construct of suspicion is under-researched in business and applied psychology, yet has wide application for both researchers and practitioners. These applications occur across many content domains (e.g., consumer psychology, leadership), as well as at varying levels of analysis (e.g., individual, group, organizational). To motivate research on this construct, possible studies are delineated/suggested by way of example and a Call for Papers also appears. The organizational sciences will benefit from the incorporation of suspicion-based constructs in theoretical and explanatory models. Organizations might also function more efficiently because of these efforts —as decision makers assess, understand, and better manage appropriate levels of suspicion in their employees and work groups.

[1]  Joseph B. Lyons,et al.  Being Transparent about Transparency: A Model for Human-Robot Interaction , 2013, AAAI Spring Symposium: Trust and Autonomous Systems.

[2]  Jonathan Gratch,et al.  Reverse appraisal: The importance of appraisals for the effect of emotion displays on people's decision making in a social dilemma , 2012, CogSci.

[3]  Christopher C. Rosen,et al.  Perceptions of Organizational Politics and Employee Citizenship Behaviors: Conscientiousness and Self-monitoring as Moderators , 2012 .

[4]  N. Kriegeskorte,et al.  Neural correlates of trust , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Cognitive Biases and Nonverbal Cue Availability in Detecting Deception , 2008 .

[6]  Pierre A. Balthazard,et al.  The psychological and neurological bases of leader self-complexity and effects on adaptive decision-making. , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  SHRM and job design: Narrowing the divide , 2010 .

[8]  E. Burnstein,et al.  Encoding under trust and distrust: the spontaneous activation of incongruent cognitions. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Leanne M. Hirshfield,et al.  Using Noninvasive Brain Measurement to Explore the Psychological Effects of Computer Malfunctions on Users during Human-Computer Interactions , 2014, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  Joseph B. Lyons,et al.  Trustworthiness and IT Suspicion: An Evaluation of the Nomological Network , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[11]  D. Isenberg Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[12]  Gary D. Bond Focus on basic cognitive mechanisms and strategies in deception research (and remand custody of ‘wizards’ to Harry Potter movies) , 2012 .

[13]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interpersonal Deception Theory , 2015 .

[14]  Leanne M. Hirshfield,et al.  The Construct of State-Level Suspicion , 2013, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  Private Eyes Are Watching You: Reactions to Location Sensing Technologies , 2011 .

[16]  Cynthia Lee,et al.  Reducing job insecurity and increasing performance ratings: does impression management matter? , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  M. Olson,et al.  The Development of IT Suspicion as a Construct and Subsequent Measure , 2012 .

[18]  Jim Euchner A Cambrian Moment , 2013 .

[19]  A. Buss,et al.  The aggression questionnaire. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  C. Senior,et al.  The Domain of Organizational Cognitive Neuroscience , 2012 .

[21]  Timothy R. Levine,et al.  The Effect of Suspicion on Deception Detection Accuracy: Optimal Level or Opposing Effects? , 2011 .

[22]  M. Bond,et al.  The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth , 1988 .

[23]  D. Dierendonck,et al.  Servant Leadership: A Review and Synthesis , 2011 .

[24]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Theory of Mind and Empathic Explanations of Machiavellianism , 2013 .

[25]  Angelika Dimoka,et al.  What Does the Brain Tell Us About Trust and Distrust? Evidence from a Functional Neuroimaging Study , 2010, MIS Q..

[26]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[27]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Organizational neuroscience: The promise and prospects of an emerging discipline , 2010 .

[28]  Thomas E. DeCarlo,et al.  The Effects of Sales Message and Suspicion of Ulterior Motives on Salesperson Evaluation , 2005 .

[29]  Nigel Melville,et al.  Information Systems Innovation for Environmental Sustainability , 2010, MIS Q..

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[31]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Exploring the disruptive effects of psychopathy and aggression on group processes and group effectiveness. , 2014, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Lane Kelley,et al.  Special Issue: Trust in an Organizational Context: Levels of Organizational Trust in Individualist Versus Collectivist Societies: A Seven-Nation Study , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[33]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Suspicion and Dispositional Inference , 1993 .

[34]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Removing the shadow of suspicion: the effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.