The combined use of D-dimer testing and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the early differential diagnosis of aortic dissection

BACKGROUND The study aimed to ascertain whether a diagnostic strategy combining D-dimer with the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could improve the discriminative performance for aortic dissection (AD). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Baseline levels of D-dimer and NLR were measured in patients suspected of AD. The diagnostic performance and clinical usefulness of D-dimer, NLR, and their combination were assessed and compared using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, logistic regression analysis, net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS The levels of D-dimer and NLR were both significantly higher in AD patients. The combined use displayed good discriminatory performance with an area under ROC curve (AUC) of 0.869, which was preferable to that of D-dimer. Although no meaningful improvement was found in the AUC by comparison with NLR alone, the combined use could significantly improve the discrimination power with a continuous NRI of 60.0% and an IDI of 4.9%. DCA demonstrated that the net benefit of the combined use was preferred over that of either single test. CONCLUSIONS The combined use of D-dimer and NLR could improve the discriminatory efficiency for AD with the potential in clinical application. This study may provide a novel diagnostic strategy for AD. More studies need to be done to confirm the findings of this study.

[1]  Zhigang Guo,et al.  The potential value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for early differential diagnosis and prognosis assessment in patients with aortic dissection. , 2021, Clinical biochemistry.

[2]  A. von Eckardstein,et al.  Novel Blood Biomarkers for a Diagnostic Workup of Acute Aortic Dissection , 2021, Diagnostics.

[3]  Z. Jing,et al.  Elevated preoperative neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio predicts early adverse outcomes in uncomplicated type B aortic dissection undergoing TEVAR , 2020, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.

[4]  Z. Jing,et al.  Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and fibrinogen values in predicting patients with type B aortic dissection , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Yi Li,et al.  An early aortic dissection screening model and applied research based on ensemble learning , 2020, Annals of translational medicine.

[6]  G. Fu,et al.  Impact of increased inflammation biomarkers on periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort study , 2020, Journal of thoracic disease.

[7]  Xiaoshu Cheng,et al.  Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in aortic disease: a meta-analysis of observational studies , 2020, Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery.

[8]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Imaging and Biomarkers in Acute Aortic Syndromes: Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications. , 2020, Current problems in cardiology.

[9]  Liang-liang Yan,et al.  Efficacy of interleukin-6 in combination with D-dimer in predicting early poor postoperative prognosis after acute stanford type a aortic dissection , 2020, Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery.

[10]  S. Grifoni,et al.  Diagnosis and management of acute aortic syndromes in the emergency department , 2020, Internal and Emergency Medicine.

[11]  Lijue Liu,et al.  A study of aortic dissection screening method based on multiple machine learning models , 2020, Journal of thoracic disease.

[12]  C. Bedel,et al.  Association of Platelet to Lymphocyte and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratios with In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Type A Acute Aortic Dissection , 2019, Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  Yi-Shan Chen,et al.  In-depth mining of clinical data: the construction of clinical prediction model with R. , 2019, Annals of translational medicine.

[14]  Man Zhang,et al.  Suggestions for designing studies investigating diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers. , 2019, Annals of translational medicine.

[15]  Cuntao Yu,et al.  Subacute/chronic type A aortic dissection: a retrospective cohort study. , 2019, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[16]  K. Eagle,et al.  Acute aortic syndromes: diagnosis and management, an update. , 2018, European heart journal.

[17]  R. Erbel,et al.  Accuracy of a diagnostic strategy combining aortic dissection detection risk score and D-dimer levels in patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome , 2017, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[18]  K. Eagle,et al.  Acute Aortic Dissection and Intramural Hematoma: A Systematic Review. , 2016, JAMA.

[19]  Eric M Isselbacher,et al.  Presentation, Diagnosis, and Outcomes of Acute Aortic Dissection: 17-Year Trends From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Yvonne Vergouwe,et al.  Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation. , 2014, European heart journal.

[21]  V. Aboyans,et al.  [2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases]. , 2014, Kardiologia polska.

[22]  Yang Li,et al.  Acute aortic dissection in China. , 2012, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  M. Woodward,et al.  Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker , 2012, Heart.

[24]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  Assessing the incremental value of diagnostic and prognostic markers: a review and illustration , 2012, European journal of clinical investigation.

[25]  M. Pencina,et al.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[26]  B. Reiser,et al.  Comparing the Areas Under Two Correlated ROC Curves: Parametric and Non‐Parametric Approaches , 2006, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[27]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.