Technologies, energy systems and the timing of CO2 emissions abatement: An overview of economic issues

Abstract This paper provides an overview of economic issues involved in timing limitations on CO2 emissions from energy systems. It highlights issues relating to technology availability, development and diffusion, and the inertia of energy systems, as being particularly important. The paper sets this in the context of wider uncertainties surrounding the problem and briefly considers other aspects relevant to timing. The paper is stimulated by the debate in the USA about optimal abatement paths, in particular recent claims that it would be economically preferable to defer such abatement action, in favour of measures that support technology development but do not affect emission trends for many years. This paper categorizes the various economic issues involved and concludes that for each economic argument that has been advanced to justify deferring emission constraints, there are counter-vailing economic arguments that could be used in support of rapid near term emissions abatement. Rational policy lies between these extremes. A policy of deferring all emissions abatement exposes economic systems and industries, as well as the environment, to significantly greater costs and risks than those arising from a more balanced approach. Furthermore the modelling studies that have been used to justify deferring emissions abatement do so because they embody the economic factors favourable to delay and largely neglect the countervailing issues, to the point where their results have little relevance to the overall problem of timing emissions abatement.

[1]  W. Nordhaus The Cost of Slowing Climate Change: a Survey , 1991 .

[2]  Partha Dasgupta,et al.  Economic policy and technological performance , 1987 .

[3]  W. Cline Economics of Global Warming, The , 1992 .

[4]  Jean Charles Hourcade,et al.  Modelling long-run scenarios , 1993 .

[5]  K. G. Quinn,et al.  Tradable Cumulative C02 Permits and Global Warming Control* , 1994 .

[6]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations , 1996, Nature.

[7]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[8]  W. Nordhaus Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change , 1994 .

[9]  Mnv,et al.  Global energy futures: An integrated perspective with the TIME-model , 1996 .

[10]  Jae Edmonds,et al.  The economics of stabilizing atmospheric CO2 concentrations , 1995 .

[11]  Michael Grubb,et al.  The economics of changing course : Implications of adaptability and inertia for optimal climate policy , 1995 .

[12]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  The Greenhouse Debate: Economic Efficiency, Burden Sharing and Hedging Strategies , 1995 .

[13]  I. Fells Energy for our common world, what will the future ask of us ? , 1995 .

[14]  Environmental Programme,et al.  Emerging Energy Technologies: Impacts and Policy Implications , 1992 .

[15]  Catherine Liston-Heyes,et al.  Sustainable resource use: the search for meaning , 1995 .

[16]  Wolf Häfele,et al.  Energy in a finite world , 1981 .