Derhoticisation in Scottish English: a sociophonetic journey

Sociophonetic variation presents us with challenges and opportunities. This paper focuses on an area of phonetic variation which is particularly rich and informative about the social exploitation of the complexities of the acoustics-articulatory relationship – namely fine-grained variation and change in Scottish English coda /r/. Scottish English is typically thought to be 'rhotic' (e.g. Wells 1982), such that postvocalic /r/ in words such as car, card, and better are realized with some kind of articulated rhotic consonant (approximant, tap, and exceptionally a trill). This paper presents historical and more recent sociophonetic data from the Central Belt of Scotland (from Edinburgh to Glasgow), which show auditory/impressionistic, acoustic, and articulatory evidence of derhoticisation (e.g. Stuart-Smith 2003; Stuart-Smith et al 2007; Lawson et al 2011a; Lawson et al 2011). Derhoticisation is especially evident in working-class speakers, whilst middle-class speakers are developing auditorily 'stronger' rhotics and merging vowels before /r/. We consider the geographical and social distribution of the rhotic-derhotic continuum in these varieties and the linguistic and sociolinguistic factors involved, and the evidence to date that exists from speech perception and social evaluation of speech. We conclude by considering how sociophonological detail and abstraction are encoded in mental representations (cf e.g. Johnson 2006).

[1]  The rise and fall of the Morningside/Kelvinside accent , 1985 .

[2]  Paul Kerswill,et al.  Electropalatography in the analysis of connected speech processes , 1989 .

[3]  John J. Ohala,et al.  Sound change is drawn from a pool of synchronic variation , 1989 .

[4]  Osamu Fujimura,et al.  Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation , 1993 .

[5]  S. Goldinger.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[6]  B. Gunter.  Media Research Methods , 2000 .

[7]  Richard Ogden,et al.  A Parametric Approach to the Phonetics of Postvocalic /r/ in Dutch , 2003, Phonetica.

[8]  Sarah Hawkins,et al.  Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[9]  P. Foulkes,et al.  Phonological Variation in Child-Directed Speech , 2005 .

[10]  Paul Foulkes,et al.  The social life of phonetics and phonology , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[11]  James M Scobbie,et al.  R) as a Variable , 2006 .

[12]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  The next toolkit , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[13]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[14]  J. Scobbie.  Biological and social grounding of phonology : variation as a research tool , 2007 .

[15]  Wang Ye-fang.  The Influence of Media Language , 2007 .

[16]  F. Tweedie,et al.  'Talkin Jockney'? Variation and change in Glaswegian accent , 2007 .

[17]  J. Scobbie,et al.  Scottish English speech acquisition. , 2007 .

[18]  J. Stuart-Smith.  A SOCIOPHONETIC INVESTIGATION OF POSTVOCALIC /r/ IN GLASWEGIAN ADOLESCENTS , 2007 .

[19]  J. Scobbie,et al.  Articulatory Insights into Language Variation and Change: Preliminary Findings from an Ultrasound Study of Derhoticization in Scottish English , 2008 .

[20]  P. Eckert.  Variation and the indexical field 1 , 2008 .

[21]  Suzanne Boyce,et al.  A magnetic resonance imaging-based articulatory and acoustic study of "retroflex" and "bunched" American English /r/. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Dominic Watt,et al.  Linguistic Accommodation and the Salience of National Identity Markers in a Border Town , 2009 .

[23]  Mary Bucholtz.  From Stance to Style , 2009 .

[24]  S. Greenfield,et al.  Introduction: women's mental health: new research findings. , 2009, Harvard review of psychiatry.

[25]  P. Kuhl.  Brain Mechanisms in Early Language Acquisition , 2010, Neuron.

[26]  J. Stuart-Smith,et al.  The role of the individual in language variation and change , 2010 .

[27]  J. Scobbie,et al.  Acoustic, articulatory and phonological perspectives on rhoticity and /r/ in Dutch. , 2010 .

[28]  Leendert Plug,et al.  The Role of F2 and F3 in the Perception of Rhoticity: Evidence from Listening Experiments , 2011, ICPhS.

[29]  J. Scobbie,et al.  The social stratification of tongue shape for postvocalic /r/ in Scottish English , 2011 .

[30]  Tamara Rathcke,et al.  Responding to Accents after Experiencing Interactive or Mediated Speech , 2011, ICPhS.

[31]  Keith Johnson.  Retroflex versus bunched (r) in compensation for coarticulation , 2011 .

[32]  James M Scobbie,et al.  Socially-stratified sampling in laboratory-based phonological experimentation , 2012 .

[33]  J. Stuart-Smith,et al.  ‘One of them sounds sort of Glasgow Uni-ish’. Social judgements and fine phonetic variation in Glasgow , 2012 .

[34]  James M. Scobbie,et al.  Bunched /r/ promotes vowel merger to schwar: An ultrasound tongue imaging study of Scottish sociophonetic variation , 2013, J. Phonetics.

[35]  Barrie Gunter,et al.  Television can also be a factor in language change: Evidence from an urban dialect , 2013 .

[36]  J. Scobbie,et al.  A Socio-Articulatory Study of Scottish Rhoticity , 2014 .

[37]  Paul Foulkes,et al.  Sociophonetics , 2015, ICPhS.