Optimal Neuronal Tuning for Finite Stimulus Spaces

The efficiency of neuronal encoding in sensory and motor systems has been proposed as a first principle governing response properties within the central nervous system. We present a continuation of a theoretical study presented by Zhang and Sejnowski, where the influence of neuronal tuning properties on encoding accuracy is analyzed using information theory. When a finite stimulus space is considered, we show that the encoding accuracy improves with narrow tuning for one- and two-dimensional stimuli. For three dimensions and higher, there is an optimal tuning width.

[1]  W. Heiligenberg,et al.  How sensory maps could enhance resolution through ordered arrangements of broadly tuned receivers , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  Philipp Slusallek,et al.  Introduction to real-time ray tracing , 2005, SIGGRAPH Courses.

[3]  Helmut Schwegler,et al.  Coarse coding: calculation of the resolution achieved by a population of large receptive field neurons , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[4]  Matthias Bethge,et al.  Optimal Short-Term Population Coding: When Fisher Information Fails , 2002, Neural Computation.

[5]  Peter E. Latham,et al.  Narrow Versus Wide Tuning Curves: What's Best for a Population Code? , 1999, Neural Computation.

[6]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[7]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Information in channel-coded systems: correlated receivers , 1992, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  S. W. Kuffler.  Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. , 1953, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  E I Knudsen,et al.  A neural map of auditory space in the owl. , 1978, Science.

[10]  Si Wu,et al.  Population Coding and Decoding in a Neural Field: A Computational Study , 2002, Neural Computation.

[11]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.

[12]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Neuronal Tuning: To Sharpen or Broaden? , 1999, Neural Computation.

[13]  W. Pitts,et al.  What the Frog's Eye Tells the Frog's Brain , 1959, Proceedings of the IRE.

[14]  Christian W. Eurich,et al.  Representational Accuracy of Stochastic Neural Populations , 2002, Neural Computation.

[15]  Barry B. Lee,et al.  Single Units and Sensation: A Retrospect , 1999, Perception.

[16]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[17]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Distributed Representations , 1986, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[18]  F. Attneave.  Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[19]  Christian W. Eurich,et al.  Multidimensional Encoding Strategy of Spiking Neurons , 2000, Neural Computation.

[20]  R. Eckhorn,et al.  Efficiency of different neuronal codes: Information transfer calculations for three different neuronal systems , 1976, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  Herman P. Snippe,et al.  Parameter Extraction from Population Codes: A Critical Assessment , 1996, Neural Computation.

[22]  J. Karbowski.  Fisher information and temporal correlations for spiking neurons with stochastic dynamics. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[23]  H Sompolinsky,et al.  Simple models for reading neuronal population codes. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Vector reconstruction from firing rates , 1994, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.