Performance Analysis of Augmented Reality Based on Vuforia Using 3D Marker Detection

In the field of education, especially engineering, there is evidence of skills gaps. According to a survey in the UK covers 2017-2024, the demand for electricity projected to increase. In fact, at the same time, 23.7% of electricity workers are predicted to experience retirement. Therefore, skills gaps need to be minimized through the development of effective and credible learning media. One of the innovations in developing instructional media is applying augmented reality. However, augmented reality performance needs testing to find out the factors that influence the success of object detection to provide maximum results when implemented in learning media. Several existing studies analyze the performance of augmented reality based on the NyARToolkit library, template matching, and the Metaio Mobile SDK. In this research, the performance of 3D object detection performed on augmented reality based on the Vuforia. The research scenarios based on the results of the analysis of the Vuforia working principle. The study conducted with three angles of shooting and several variations of light intensity and distance of the object. The research also conducted by covering part of the object's surface. The results showed that the Vuforia was able to detect objects well in several scenarios that applied with a success rate of 87.5%. The success rate of object detection strongly influenced by the surface area of the detected object and the intensity of the light space.

[1]  Jyh-Chong Liang,et al.  Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  Innovations in Smart Learning , 2017 .

[3]  Joseph Mutale Educational Challenges: Issues with Power Engineering Education [In My View] , 2018 .

[4]  Yasin Ozarslan,et al.  Augmented Reality in Education: Current Technologies and the Potential for Education , 2012 .

[5]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  Augmented Reality in the Classroom , 2012, Computer.

[6]  Dalius Navakauskas,et al.  An Efficiency Analysis of Augmented Reality Marker Recognition Algorithm , 2014 .

[7]  Markus König,et al.  Performance Study on Natural Marker Detection for Augmented Reality Supported Facility Maintenance , 2013 .

[8]  Mohammed Bouhorma,et al.  A comparative Study of Augmented Reality SDKs to Develop an Educational Application in Chemical Field , 2019, NISS19.

[9]  Woontack Woo,et al.  Depth-assisted Real-time 3D Object Detection for Augmented Reality , 2011 .

[10]  Suleyman V. Levinzon,et al.  The teaching of electrical and electronics engineering at technical Universities in the world , 2016, 2016 51st International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC).

[11]  Vincent Lepetit,et al.  Dominant orientation templates for real-time detection of texture-less objects , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  The MagicBook - Moving Seamlessly between Reality and Virtuality , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.