Native Speaker Reaction to Non-Native Speech.

speech at the Advanced and Superior Levels, yet the assumption that testers of oral proficiency can effectively distinguish among not only student speaking skills but also among the comprehension skills of the various types of interlocutors named within the descriptors has yet to be validated. Van Lier (p. 494) stresses the need to determine if, in fact, generalizable attributes exist which limit comprehensibility by interlocutor type. Magnan (p. 268) urges a reexamination of the descriptors for Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) rating levels using actual language data from students, in order to indicate how many and what type of errors are associated with the various OPI levels. The ACTFL Guidelines state that the non-

[1]  S. Oyama.  A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system , 1976 .

[2]  Dwight L. Bolinger,et al.  Two views of accent , 1985, Journal of Linguistics.

[3]  T. Scovel.  A Time to Speak: A Psycholinguistic Inquiry into the Critical Period for Human Speech , 1988 .

[4]  E. Horwitz.  The Beliefs about Language Learning of Beginning University Foreign Language Students , 1988 .

[5]  Leo Van Lier,et al.  Reeling, Writhing, Drawling, Stretching, and Fainting in Coils: Oral Proficiency Interviews as Conversation , 1989 .

[6]  Stephen Krashen,et al.  The Natural Approach , 1983 .

[7]  James P. Lantolf,et al.  Oral‐Proficiency Testing: A Critical Analysis , 1985 .

[8]  W. Lambert,et al.  Evaluational reactions to accented English speech. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[9]  Patricia B. Powell,et al.  Moi Tarzan, Vous Jane? A Study of Communicative Competence , 1975 .

[10]  Robert L. Politzer,et al.  Errors of English Speakers of German As Perceived and Evaluated by German Natives , 1978 .

[11]  Joan M. Fayer,et al.  Native and Nonnative Judgments of Intelligibility and Irritation , 1987 .

[12]  Linda Gaylord Piazza.  French Tolerance for Grammatical Errors Made by Americans , 1980 .

[13]  Birgit Henriksen,et al.  NATIVE SPEAKER REACTIONS TO LEARNERS' SPOKEN INTERLANGUAGE 1 , 1980 .

[14]  Gerard L. Ervin.  Communication Strategies Employed by American Students of Russian , 1977 .

[15]  Sally Sieloff Magnan.  Grammar and the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview: Discussion and Data , 1988 .

[16]  Kathleen Y. Ensz.  French Attitudes toward Typical Speech Errors of American Speakers of French. , 1982 .

[17]  Ellen Bouchard Ryan,et al.  Evaluative reactions of adolescents toward speakers of standard English and Mexican American accented English. , 1975 .

[18]  Comprehension, Irritation and Error Hierarchies , 1985 .

[19]  Lyle F. Bachman,et al.  The Evaluation of Communicative Language Proficiency: A Critique of the ACTFL Oral Interview , 1986 .

[20]  Kenneth D. Chastain,et al.  Native Speaker Reaction to Instructor-Identified Student Second-Language Errors. , 1980 .

[21]  Jeannette Ludwig.  Native‐Speaker Judgments of Second‐Language Learners' Efforts at Communication: A Review , 1982 .

[22]  S. Krashen.  Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning , 1988 .

[23]  B Arthur,et al.  Evaluation Reactions of College Students to Dialect Differences in the English of Mexican-Americans , 1974, Language and speech.

[24]  Vicki Galloway.  Perceptions of the Communicative Efforts of American Students of Spanish , 1980 .

[25]  Gail Guntermann,et al.  A Study of the Frequency and Communicative Effects of Errors in Spanish , 1978 .