Abrasion Evaluation of Moon and Mars Simulants on Rotating Shaft/Sealing Materials: Simulants and Structural Materials Review and Selection

Tribological testing of moving shaft/sealing pairs in complex environments is at the frontline of research. Machines working in abrasive conditions are subject to different wear effects. It is not only valid on Earth but especially valid for rovers and future robots used in Mars and Moon missions. The aim of our joint research with the European Space Agency is to study the abrasion phenomena of moving machine elements on Mars and the Moon by using artificial soil samples (“simulants”). This review details mainly the available simulant sources and recommend a selection of the most suitable ones for tribological testing. Moreover, the potential mating structural materials subjected to abrasive space applications are reviewed briefly. The tribological tests are exploring the features of the rotary shaft/seal relationship that is subject to dry friction and intense abrasion. By using the simulants, measurements are performed under laboratory conditions with both a sample test and a real shaft/seal connection. Parameters of the selection criteria were defined, and classification of the simulant sources were made. It was found that simulant particle size distribution and chemical substance content are detailed enough only for a limited type of available artificial Moon and Mars soil samples. Four simulants were identified and applied later in the tribological testing. For the shaft materials, based on a detailed case study of polymers, steel, and aluminum alloys, a high-strength aluminum alloy with a hard anodized surface and a stainless steel were selected for further abrasion tests.

[1]  J. Gates,et al.  Comparing the abrasion performance of NiHard-4 and high-Cr-Mo white cast irons: The effects of chemical composition and microstructure , 2021, Wear.

[2]  A. Nath,et al.  Three-body dry abrasive wear properties of 15–5 precipitation hardening stainless steel produced by laser powder bed fusion process , 2021 .

[3]  A. Ahmed,et al.  Assessment of the Geomechanical Properties of Lunar Simulant Soils , 2021 .

[4]  K. Joy,et al.  Geotechnical characterisation of two new low-fidelity lunar regolith analogues (UoM-B and UoM-W) for use in large-scale engineering experiments , 2020 .

[5]  R. Misra,et al.  On the impacts of grain refinement and strain-induced deformation on three-body abrasive wear responses of 18Cr–8Ni austenitic stainless steel , 2020 .

[6]  D. Ming,et al.  Greenland 'White Mountain' Anorthosite: A New Lunar Polar Regolith Simulant Component , 2020 .

[7]  Zhao-dong Wang,et al.  Effect of TiC particles on three-body abrasive wear behaviour of low alloy abrasion-resistant steel , 2019, Wear.

[8]  B. Liu,et al.  Effects of niobium particles on the wear behavior of powder metallurgical γ-TiAl alloy in different environments , 2019, Wear.

[9]  Baolin Liu,et al.  Non-uniform abrasive particle size effects on friction characteristics of FKM O-ring seals under three-body abrasion , 2019, Tribology International.

[10]  V. C. Teles,et al.  Influence of metallurgical texture on the abrasive wear of hot-rolled wear resistant carbon steels , 2019, Wear.

[11]  K. Das,et al.  Effect of thermo-mechanical processing on the low impact abrasion and low stress sliding wear resistance of austenitic high manganese steels , 2019, Wear.

[12]  R. Song,et al.  Dimensionality wear analysis: Three-body impact abrasive wear behavior of a martensitic steel in comparison with Mn13Cr2 , 2018, Wear.

[13]  Zhao-dong Wang,et al.  Effects of using (Ti,Mo)C particles to reduce the three-body abrasive wear of a low alloy steel , 2018, Wear.

[14]  Peter Spanoudakis,et al.  Development challenges of a focus mechanism for EXOMARS mission submitted to the harsh Martian environment , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[15]  S. Mridha.  Metallic materials , 2018, Corrosion Handbook.

[16]  Trent M. Smith,et al.  Mars global simulant MGS-1: A Rocknest-based open standard for basaltic martian regolith simulants , 2018, Icarus.

[17]  M. Shah,et al.  Three-body abrasive wear of carbide-free bainite, martensite and bainite-martensite structure of similar hardness , 2018 .

[18]  M. Z. Naser,et al.  Materials and design concepts for space-resilient structures , 2018 .

[19]  J. Schoenung,et al.  Reinforcement size effects on the abrasive wear of boron carbide reinforced aluminum composites , 2017 .

[20]  S. Chowdhury,et al.  Surface and sub-surface damage of 0.20 wt% C-martensite during three-body abrasion , 2017 .

[21]  J. Xing,et al.  Effects of chromium additions on the three-body abrasive wear behavior of Fe-3.0 wt% B alloy , 2017 .

[22]  E. Albertin,et al.  Synergetic effect of niobium and molybdenum on abrasion resistance of high chromium cast irons , 2017 .

[23]  M. Varga.  High temperature abrasive wear of metallic materials , 2017 .

[24]  C. Bühler.  Experimental investigation of lunar dust impact wear for different grain sizes and impact angles , 2017, 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[25]  Wei Wang,et al.  Organic polymer materials in the space environment , 2016 .

[26]  S. Zafar,et al.  Abrasive and erosive wear behaviour of nanometric WC–12Co microwave clads , 2016 .

[27]  C. Bühler.  Experimental investigation of lunar dust impact wear , 2015 .

[28]  E. Albertin,et al.  Structure refinement effect on two and three-body abrasion resistance of high chromium cast irons , 2015 .

[29]  B. Prakash,et al.  Influence of temperature on abrasive wear of boron steel and hot forming tool steels , 2015 .

[30]  C. Higgs,et al.  An experimental study of lunar dust erosive wear potential using the JSC-1AF lunar dust simulant , 2014 .

[31]  M. Anand,et al.  Space Architecture technology for settlement and exploration on other planetary bodies – In-Situ Resource Utilisation (ISRU) based structures on the Moon , 2014 .

[32]  M. Roy,et al.  Microstructural developments during abrasion of M50 bearing steel , 2014 .

[33]  H. Mayer,et al.  Wear reducing effects and temperature dependence of tribolayer formation in harsh environment , 2013 .

[34]  E. Badisch,et al.  Study of abrasive wear phenomena in dry and slurry 3-body conditions , 2013 .

[35]  W. Beckman,et al.  Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes: Duffie/Solar Engineering 4e , 2013 .

[36]  C. Mulligan,et al.  Evaluation of the wear and abrasion resistance of hard coatings by ball-on-three-disk test methods—A case study , 2013 .

[37]  Tiedo Tinga,et al.  Investigating the influence of sand particle properties on abrasive wear behaviour , 2012 .

[38]  R. Grugel,et al.  Performance of lunar sulfur concrete in lunar environments , 2012 .

[39]  Julian A. Wharton,et al.  Effect of abrasive particle size and the influence of microstructure on the wear mechanisms in wear-resistant materials , 2012 .

[40]  Maksim Antonov,et al.  Effect of temperature and load on three-body abrasion of cermets and steel , 2012 .

[41]  Kenneth G. Budinski,et al.  Adhesive transfer to abrasive particles in abrasion testing , 2011 .

[42]  A. Harsha.  An investigation on low stress abrasive wear characteristics of high performance engineering thermoplastic polymers , 2011 .

[43]  Nildeep M Patel,et al.  Soil simulant sourcing for the ExoMars rover testbed , 2011 .

[44]  A. Sengupta,et al.  Thermal coating erosion in a simulated Martian landing environment , 2011 .

[45]  Louise Jandura,et al.  Mars Science Laboratory Sample Acquisition, Sample Processing and Handling: Subsystem Design and Test Challenges , 2010 .

[46]  Irebert R. Delgado,et al.  Preliminary Assessment of Seals for Dust Mitigation of Mechanical Components for Lunar Surface Systems , 2010 .

[47]  B. Kennedy,et al.  An Overview of the Mars Science Laboratory Sample Acquisition, Sample Processing, and Handling Subsystem , 2010 .

[48]  Yimin Gao,et al.  Three-body abrasive wear behavior of CC/high-Cr WCI composite and its interfacial characteristics , 2010 .

[49]  J. Spray,et al.  The Shawmere anorthosite and OB-1 as lunar highland regolith simulants , 2009 .

[50]  P. Shipway,et al.  Particle motion and modes of wear in the dry sand-rubber wheel abrasion test , 2009 .

[51]  E.T. Baumgartner,et al.  The Mars Exploration Rover instrument positioning system , 2005, 2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[52]  Brian D. Harrington,et al.  The Challenges of Designing the Rocker-Bogie Suspension for the Mars Exploration Rover , 2004 .

[53]  M. Nishimura,et al.  Evaluation Tests of Industrial Vacuum Bearings for Space Use , 2003 .

[54]  Simon Henein,et al.  Mechanical slit mask mechanism for the James Webb Space Telescope spectrometer , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[55]  D. Trouchet,et al.  A mirror control mechanism for space telescope , 2003 .

[56]  Norbert I. Kömle,et al.  The ROSETTA Lander anchoring system , 2003 .

[57]  Rius Billing,et al.  Caging mechanisms for the Mars Exploration Rover instrument deployment device , 2003 .

[58]  Sean Dougherty,et al.  Micro-Imager Dust Cover, Micro-Imager Contact Sensor, and Mössbauer Spectrometer Contact Sensor mechanisms for the Mars Exploration Rovers , 2003 .

[59]  T. Ng,et al.  Mars Rock Corer and Planetary Micro Sampling Tools , 2002 .

[60]  Mark J. Jansen,et al.  The Tribological Properties of Several Silahydrocarbons for Use in Space Mechanisms , 2001 .

[61]  M. Alexander,et al.  Mars Transportation Environment Definition Document , 2001 .

[62]  Giovanni Cherubini,et al.  Four cover mechanisms for the Rosetta mission , 1999 .

[63]  Karen M. Jager,et al.  Martian Regolith Simulant JSC Mars-1 , 1998 .

[64]  William A. Beckman,et al.  Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, 2nd ed. , 1994 .

[65]  H. Kanamori,et al.  Long-Term Properties of Mortar Exposed to a Vacuum , 1991, SP-125: Lunar Concrete.

[66]  A. Cowley,et al.  TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION OF COMPLIANT MECHANISMS AS A DESIGN METHOD TO IMPROVE HARDWARE PERFORMANCE IN LUNAR DUST ENVIRONMENT , 2021 .

[67]  S. Linke,et al.  TUBS-M and TUBS-T based modular Regolith Simulant System for the support of lunar ISRU activities , 2020 .

[68]  H. Koerner,et al.  Laser Sintering of Thermoset Polyimide Composites , 2019, CAMX 2019.

[69]  D. Grandy,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND QUALIFICATION OF THE EXOMARS BOGIE ELECTRO-MECHANICAL ASSEMBLY (BEMA) ROTARY ACTUATORS , 2019 .

[70]  R. Jaumann,et al.  EXOMARS PANCAM HIGH RESOLUTION CAMERA (HRC): EVOLUTION FROM BB TO FM , 2019 .

[71]  Donchev,et al.  DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LIGHTWEIGHT ADVANCED ROBOTIC ARM DEMONSTRATOR (LARAD) , 2017 .

[72]  SEALING CAP FOR METIS INSTRUMENT IN SOLAR ORBITER FDM SUBSYSTEM , 2017 .

[73]  L. Richter,et al.  “ BACKLASH-FREE ” GAS-TIGHT HIGH PRECISION SAMPLE HANDLING MECHANISMS – LESSONS LEARNED FROM QUALIFICATION TESTING 
 & 
 DESIGN AND LESSONS LEARNED OF THE CORE SAMPLE HANDLING MECHANISM ( CSHS ) ON THE EXOMARS 2020 , 2017 .

[74]  P. Campo,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A HIGH TEMPERATURE ANTENNA POINTING MECHANISMS FOR BEPICOLOMBO PLANETARY ORBITER , 2013 .

[75]  Heinz-Wilhelm Hübers,et al.  Optimizing the detection of carotene in cyanobacteria in a martian regolith analogue with a Raman spectrometer for the ExoMars mission , 2012 .

[76]  D. Verhoeven,et al.  LOCKING MECHANISM FOR IXV RE-ENTRY DEMONSTRATOR FLAP CONTROL SYSTEM , 2011 .

[77]  T. Schmidt,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A TWO HINGE SHUTTER AND CALIBRATION MECHANISM , 2011 .

[78]  Richard Fleischner,et al.  Mars Science Laboratory Robotic Arm , 2011 .

[79]  David H. Blum,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF THE LID OPENING MECHANISM "LOM" , 2007 .

[80]  N. Lindsey.  Lunar Station Protection: Lunar Regolith Shielding (AAS 03-720) , 2004 .

[81]  Jean-Luc Bozet,et al.  Modelling of friction and wear for cryogenic valve seals of rocket engines , 2000 .

[82]  Paul Buchele,et al.  Development of a modular two-axis gimbal mechanism for spacecraft antenna and thruster pointing , 1999 .

[83]  E. W. Roberts,et al.  A SPACE TRIBOLOGY HANDBOOK , 1998 .

[84]  Demichelis,et al.  Evaluation of the , 1992, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[85]  Lawrence W. Townsend,et al.  Solar-flare shielding with regolith at a lunar-base site , 1988 .