Perceiving Binocular Depth with Reference to a Common Surface

A common surface is a spatial regularity of our terrestrial environment. For instance, we walk on the common ground surface, lay a variety of objects on the table top, and display our favorite paintings on the wall. It has been proposed that the visual system utilizes this regularity as a reference frame for coding objects' distances. Presumably, by treating the common surface as such—ie an anticipated constant—the visual system can reduce its coding redundancy, and divert its resources to representing other information. For intermediate-distance space perception, it has been found that absolute distance judgment is most accurate when a common ground surface is available. Here we explored if the common surface also serves as the reference frame for the processing of binocular-disparity information, which is a predominant cue for near-distance space perception. We capitalized on an established observation where the perceived slant of a surface with linear binocular-disparity gradient is underestimated. Clearly, if the visual system utilizes this incorrectly represented slant surface as a reference frame for coding the objects' locations, the perceived depth separation between the objects will be adversely affected. Our results confirm this, by showing that the depth judgment of objects (two laterally separated vertical lines) on, or in the vicinity of, the surface is underestimated. Furthermore, we show that the impact of the common surface on perceived depth separation most likely occurs at the surface-representation level where the visual surface has been explicitly delineated, rather than at the earlier disparity-processing level.

[1]  A. GLENNERSTER,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth Constancy Depends on the Subject's Task , 1996, Vision Research.

[2]  Barbara Gillam,et al.  The Interaction of Stereopsis and Perspective in the Perception of Depth , 1996 .

[3]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Illusory-Contour Formation Affected by Luminance Contrast Polarity , 1998, Perception.

[4]  B. Gillam,et al.  Perception of slant when perspective and stereopsis conflict: experiments with aniseikonic lenses. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[6]  B. Julesz,et al.  A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF ILLUSORY CONTOUR FORMATION IN STEREOPSIS , 1995 .

[7]  B Gillam.  Stereoscopic Slant Reversals: A New Kind of ‘Induced’ Effect , 1993, Perception.

[8]  William M. Youngs.  The influence of perspective and disparity cues on the perception of slant , 1976, Vision Research.

[9]  S. McKee,et al.  Mechanisms underlying the anisotropy of stereoscopic tilt perception , 1990, Vision Research.

[10]  G. Kanizsa.  Margini Quasi-percettivi in Campi con Stimolazione Omogenea , 1955 .

[11]  G. Westheimer,et al.  The perception of depth in simple figures , 1984, Vision Research.

[12]  Allen Brookes,et al.  Integrating stereopsis with monocular interpretations of planar surfaces , 1988, Vision Research.

[13]  Martin S. Banks,et al.  Extra-retinal and perspective cues cause the small range of the induced effect , 1998, Vision Research.

[14]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[15]  J. Gibson.  The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[16]  G. Kanizsa,et al.  Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception , 1979 .

[17]  H. Sedgwick.  Environment-Centered Representation of Spatial Layout: Available Visual Information from Texture and Perspective , 1983 .

[18]  R N Haber,et al.  Comparison of Nine Methods of Indicating the Direction to Objects: Data from Blind Adults , 1993, Perception.

[19]  W C Gogel.  Depth adjacency and cue effectiveness. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Suzanne P. McKee,et al.  The spatial requirements for fine stereoacuity , 1983, Vision Research.

[21]  K Nakayama,et al.  Toward a neural understanding of visual surface representation. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[22]  S. McKee,et al.  Bias and sensitivity of stereo judgements in the presence of a slanted reference plane , 1999, Vision Research.

[23]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Binocular Vision and Stereopsis , 1996 .

[24]  Heinz Werner,et al.  Binocular Depth Contrast and the Conditions of the Binocular Field , 1938 .

[25]  James A. Crowell,et al.  Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception , 1999, Vision Research.

[26]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Terrain influences the accurate judgement of distance , 1998, Nature.

[27]  B Gillam,et al.  Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Perceptual Organization of Apparent Motion in the Ternus Display , 1999, Perception.

[29]  H A Sedgwick,et al.  Components of Visual Information Specifying the Surface of a Picture: Their Relative Effectiveness in Decreasing Cross-Talk from the Depicted Scene , 1996 .

[30]  F. Attneave.  Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[31]  Barbara Gillam,et al.  Perspective, Orientation Disparity, and Anisotropy in Stereoscopic Slant Perception , 1992, Perception.

[32]  M. Banks,et al.  An Analysis of Binocular Slant Contrast , 1999, Perception.

[33]  K N OGLE,et al.  The binocular depth contrast phenomenon. , 1946, The American journal of psychology.

[34]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[35]  G Mitchison,et al.  The Neural Representation of Stereoscopic Depth Contrast , 1993, Perception.

[36]  E. Reed.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[37]  W. H. Gardner,et al.  The study of the pupillary reflex, with special reference to stuttering. , 1937 .

[38]  Scott N. J. Watamaniuk,et al.  Seeing motion behind occluders , 1995, Nature.

[39]  H. A. Sedgwick.  Combining Multiple Forms Of Visual Information To Specify Contact Relations In Spatial Layout , 1990, Other Conferences.

[40]  B. Rogers,et al.  Disparity curvature and the perception of three-dimensional surfaces , 1989, Nature.

[41]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Visual surface representation: a critical link between lower-level and higher level vision , 1995 .

[42]  Tribhawan Kumar,et al.  Influence of remote objects on local depth perception , 1991, Vision Research.

[43]  W. Gogel,et al.  Perception of the relative distance position of objects as a function of other objects in the field. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.