Exploring the potential impact of implementing carbon capture technologies in fossil fuel power plants on regional European water stress index levels

Equipping power plants with carbon capture technology can affect cooling demand and water use. This study has explored the potential impact of large scale deployment of power plants with carbon capture technologies on future regional water stress in Europe. A database including 458 of European largest power plants with data on location, technology, age, fuel type, amount of electricity generation and cooling method has been developed. This data has been combined with literature data on water use rates and developed scenarios to calculate corresponding water use of these European power plants for 2030 and 2050 under different conditions, such as the penetration level of carbon capture technologies and installed technologies. Water stress methodology based on water withdrawal has been used to explore the impact of carbon capture and storage on future water stress levels. Our findings indicate that by 2030, no considerable increase in water stress is expected due to the instalment of carbon capture technologies. However, when assuming a high penetration level of carbon capture technologies, water stress in 2050 might substantially increase in many regions in Europe. The extent of the increase in water stress strongly depends on penetration level of carbon capture, installed power plant and cooling technologies and applied water stress methodology. When using water consumption to estimate water stress, the results do not indicate significant changes in water stress for the scenarios with carbon capture. Nevertheless, as water stress based on water withdrawal is currently the common method, the results of this study provide reasons for concern regarding the potential impact of carbon capture on future European water stress levels and indicate the need for future research to monitor and possibly prevent potential water stress increases from the instalment of carbon capture technologies.

[1]  D. Elcock,et al.  Water vulnerabilities for existing coal-fired power plants. , 2010 .

[2]  G. Heath,et al.  Operational water consumption and withdrawal factors for electricity generating technologies: a review of existing literature , 2012 .

[3]  P. Döll,et al.  Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability , 2003 .

[4]  James A. Edmonds,et al.  Water demands for electricity generation in the U.S.: Modeling different scenarios for the water–energy nexus , 2015 .

[5]  Aie,et al.  Energy Technology Perspectives 2012 , 2006 .

[6]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  Electricity generation and cooling water use: UK pathways to 2050 § , 2014 .

[7]  Stefan Vögele,et al.  Dynamic modelling of water demand, water availability and adaptation strategies for power plants to global change , 2009 .

[8]  S. Pfister,et al.  Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Jan Mertens,et al.  Water footprinting of electricity generated by combined cycle gas turbines using different cooling technologies: a practitioner's experience , 2015 .

[10]  Stephan Pfister,et al.  Characterization factors for thermal pollution in freshwater aquatic environments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  P. Kyle,et al.  An integrated assessment of global and regional water demands for electricity generation to 2095 , 2013 .

[12]  Martina Flörke,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF GLOBAL SPATIALLY DETAILED ESTIMATES OF SECTORAL WATER REQUIREMENTS, PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE, INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF THE MAIN UNCERTAINTIES, RISKS AND VULNERABILITIES OF HUMAN WATER DEMAND , 2011 .

[13]  James J. Dooley,et al.  Assessing the impacts of future demand for saline groundwater on commercial deployment of CCS in the United States , 2009 .

[14]  Timothy J. Skone,et al.  Water: A critical resource in the thermoelectric power industry , 2008 .

[15]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  Identifying future electricity-water tradeoffs in the United States , 2009 .

[16]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation , 2011 .

[17]  Michael Matuszewski,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Reductions in the Power Industry Using Domestic Coal and Biomass - Volume 1: IGCC , 2013 .

[18]  Can Wang,et al.  Trend of technology innovation in China's coal-fired electricity industry under resource and environmental constraints , 2011 .

[19]  F. Ludwig,et al.  Vulnerability of US and European electricity supply to climate change , 2012 .

[20]  Global Energy Assessment Writing Team.  Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future , 2012 .

[21]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Life-cycle uses of water in U.S. electricity generation , 2010 .

[22]  Stephan Pfister,et al.  Review of methods addressing freshwater use in life cycle inventory and impact assessment , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[23]  Michael E. Webber,et al.  Thirst for energy , 2008 .

[24]  Garvin A. Heath,et al.  Review of Operational Water Consumption and Withdrawal Factors for Electricity Generating Technologies , 2011 .

[25]  Dirk T. G. Rübbelke,et al.  Impacts of Climate Change on European Critical Infrastructures: The Case of the Power Sector , 2010 .

[26]  Felipe J. Colón-González,et al.  Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  S. Pfister,et al.  Monthly water stress: spatially and temporally explicit consumptive water footprint of global crop production , 2014 .

[28]  I. Prentice,et al.  Future Global Water Resources with respect to Climate Change and Water Withdrawals , 2010 .

[29]  James J. Dooley,et al.  Climate Mitigation’s Impact On Global and Regional Electric Power Sector Water Use in the 21st Century☆ , 2013 .