Task Analysis of Tactical Leadership Skills for Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle Leaders

Abstract : This report presents a task analysis of the Tactical Leadership Skills of Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle leaders. The task list was examined for critical training requirements, and requirements for training device support of this training were identified. Existing and projected training devices and materials were examined for adequacy in meeting each of the requirements, and recommendations were made on the identity and characteristics of devices required to support Bradley Leader training. The task lists, covering squad through battalion level, provide a generic listing of a set of mechanized infantry leadership tasks, and can be used as a data base for other tactical training program developments. Keywords: Task analysis; Gunnery; Tactics; Leadership; Infantry; Tactical skills; Mechanized infantry.

[1]  Samuel A Hicks.  The Effects of Four Hours Confinement in Mobile Armored Personnel Carriers on Selected Combat Relevant Skills: A Pilot Study , 1960 .

[2]  David P. Spencer.  Independent Evaluation Report for Platoon Early Warning System (PEWS- IER) AN/TRS-2( ) , 1977 .

[3]  Arnold G. Fisch,et al.  DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY , 1990 .

[4]  Gary Kress,et al.  Implementation and Evaluation of the Tank Crew Training Program for USAREUR Units , 1979 .

[5]  W. Dean Chiles,et al.  HUMAN PERFORMANCE AND THE WORK-REST SCHEDULE , 1961 .

[6]  Robert L. Egbert,et al.  Fighter I: An Analysis of Combat Fighters and Non-Fighters, , 1957 .

[7]  Robert H. Sulzen.  The Effects of Repeated Engagement Simulation Exercises on Individual and Collective Performance , 1980 .

[8]  Robert A. Baker,et al.  User Manual for the Miniature Armor Battlefield (MAB). Revision , 1962 .

[9]  D. Grimsley,et al.  Acquisition, Retention, and Retraining: Effects of High and Low Fidelity in Training Devices. Technical Report 69-1. , 1969 .

[10]  L. L. Ainsworth,et al.  The Effects of a 48-Hour Period of Sustained Field Activity on Tank Crew Performance , 1971 .

[12]  Robert A. Baker,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF SYSTEMS FOR THE CONDUCT OF TACTICAL TRAINING AT THE TANK PLATOON LEVEL , 1964 .

[13]  Arthur I. Siegel,et al.  Soldier Performance in Continuous Operations , 1985 .

[14]  Henry P Lenzycki,et al.  How to Determine Training Device Requirements and Characteristics: A Handbook for Training Developers , 1980 .

[15]  William H Ton,et al.  Study of Psychological (and Associated Physiological) Effects on a Tank Crew Resulting from Being Buttoned Up , 1976 .

[16]  M S Salter.  Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle Procedures Guides: Commander and Gunner , 1984 .

[17]  R. Kern.  A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF BEHAVIOR UNDER STRESS, WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR COMBAT TRAINING , 1966 .

[18]  Margaret S Salter.  Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle Procedures Guide: Driver , 1984 .

[19]  Robert A. Baker.  A SURVEY OF PROBLEMS IN THE TACTICAL TRAINING OF ARMOR UNITS (U) , 1961 .

[20]  Louise M. Weston,et al.  Feasibility Study to Predict Combat Effectiveness for Selected Military Roles: Fighter Pilot Effectiveness , 1977 .

[21]  Joseph A. Olmstead,et al.  Research on Training for Brigade Command Groups: Factors Contributing to Unit Combat Readiness , 1978 .

[22]  Georges R. Garinther,et al.  Acoustical Evaluation of the M60A1 Tank During Typical Operations. , 1973 .

[23]  G. D. Coates,et al.  Effects of Continuous Work and Sleep Loss on the Recovery of Sustained Performance. , 1973 .

[24]  Seth Bonder,et al.  Human Factors Representations for Combat Models , 1982 .

[25]  Earl A. Alluisi,et al.  HUMAN PERFORMANCE AS A FUNCTION OF THE WORK-REST CYCLE. A REVIEW OF SELECTED STUDIES , 1960 .