Estimation of the Rate of SNP Genotyping Errors From DNA Extracted From Different Tissues

High density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping panels provide an alternative to microsatellite markers for genome scans. However, genotype errors have a major impact on power to detect linkage or association and are difficult to detect for SNPs. We estimated error rates with the Affymetrix GeneChip SNP platform in samples from a family with a mixed set of monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) triplets using lymphocyte, buccal DNA and samples from whole genome amplification using the multiple displacement amplification (MDA) technique. The average call rate from 58,960 SNPs for five genomic samples was 99.48%. Comparison of results for the MZ twins showed only three discordant genotypes (concordance rate 99.995%). The mean concordance rate for comparisons of samples from lymphocyte and buccal DNA was 99.97%. Mendelian inconsistencies were identified in 46 SNPs with errors in one or more family members, a rate of 0.022%. Observed genotype concordance rates between parents, between parents and children, and among siblings were consistent with previously reported allele frequencies and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Using the MDA technique, results for two samples had equivalent high accuracy to results with genomic samples. However, the SNP call rate for the remaining seven samples varied from 72.5% to 99.5%, with an average of 86.11%. Quality of the DNA sample following the MDA reaction appears to be the critical factor in SNP call rate for MDA samples. Our results demonstrate highly accurate and reproducible genotyping for the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Mapping Set in lymphocyte and buccal DNA samples.

[1]  Z. Zhao,et al.  A comparison of DNA pools constructed following whole genome amplification for two-stage SNP genotyping designs. , 2005, Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies.

[2]  Eleftheria Zeggini,et al.  Whole-genome scan, in a complex disease, using 11,245 single-nucleotide polymorphisms: comparison with microsatellites. , 2004, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  Galina Deyneko,et al.  Whole genome amplification of DNA from laser capture-microdissected tissue for high-throughput single nucleotide polymorphism and short tandem repeat genotyping. , 2004, The American journal of pathology.

[4]  S. P. Fodor,et al.  Large-scale genotyping of complex DNA , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  G. Abecasis,et al.  The Effect of Genotype and Pedigree Error on Linkage Analysis: Analysis of Three Asthma Genome Scans , 2001, Genetic epidemiology.

[6]  Nicholas W Wood,et al.  Selection and evaluation of tagging SNPs in the neuronal-sodium-channel gene SCN1A: implications for linkage-disequilibrium gene mapping. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[7]  D. Levinson,et al.  Identification and analysis of error types in high-throughput genotyping. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  Roger S Lasken,et al.  Unbiased whole-genome amplification directly from clinical samples. , 2003, Genome research.

[9]  D. Hunter,et al.  Multiple displacement amplification prior to single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in epidemiologic studies , 2003, Biotechnology Letters.

[10]  Shirley A. Miller,et al.  A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  Stacey S Cherny,et al.  The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits , 2001, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[12]  M. Nelson,et al.  BRAF polymorphisms and risk of melanocytic neoplasia. , 2005, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[13]  A. Oliphant,et al.  BeadArray technology: enabling an accurate, cost-effective approach to high-throughput genotyping. , 2002, BioTechniques.

[14]  G. Geffen,et al.  Genetic sources of covariation among P3(00) and online performance variables in a delayed-response working memory task , 2002, Biological Psychology.

[15]  Stephen J Finch,et al.  What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies? , 2004, Genetic epidemiology.

[16]  Sarah E Medland,et al.  A genome scan for eye color in 502 twin families: most variation is due to a QTL on chromosome 15q. , 2004, Twin research : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies.

[17]  Derek Gordon,et al.  True Pedigree Errors More Frequent Than Apparent Errors for Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms , 1999, Human Heredity.

[18]  S. Kingsmore,et al.  Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  D. Duffy,et al.  Epidermal growth factor gene (EGF) polymorphism and risk of melanocytic neoplasia. , 2004, The Journal of investigative dermatology.