What Characters Know: Projected Knowledge and Projected Co-Presence

What inferences do readers make about “who knows what” in narrative worlds? We introduce the concepts of projected knowledge and projected co-presence to describe circumstances in which readers infer that characters possess information presented, for example, only in narration. Our experiments examine one type of evidence readers use to project knowledge. In Experiment 1, readers used characters’ utterances as evidence to revise their judgments about characters’ awareness information presented in the narration. Experiment 2 established that this effect is not due to the presence of just any utterance in the story. Experiment 3 demonstrated differential projection of knowledge for characters depending on whether they were speakers or addressees of the critical utterance. Experiment 4 suggested that readers make these inferences with limited reflection. Experiment 5 demonstrated that readers’ judgment times for characters’ knowledge is affected by the properties of the projecting utterance. We conclude that individuals are skilled in evaluating textual evidence to project knowledge and co-presence. © 2001 Academic Press

[1]  B. Keysar.  The Illusory Transparency of Intention: Does June Understand What Mark Means Because He Means It? , 2000 .

[2]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading , 1993 .

[3]  S. Brennan,et al.  Illusory Transparency Revisited , 2000 .

[4]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994, Psychological review.

[5]  Mark Helprin.  The Best American Short Stories, 1988 , 1988 .

[6]  B. Webber,et al.  Elements of Discourse Understanding , 1983 .

[7]  Peter A. Flach,et al.  Abduction and Induction , 2000 .

[8]  A. Graesser,et al.  Quantitative discourse psychology , 1997 .

[9]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[10]  R. Mason,et al.  Who Knows What about Whom: What Role Does Common Ground Play in Accessing Distant Information? , 1998 .

[11]  Justina O. Ohaeri,et al.  What Can We Conclude From Speakers Behaving Badly? , 2000 .

[12]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[13]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[14]  B. Keysar,et al.  The Illusory Transparency of Intention: Linguistic Perspective Taking in Text , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Jerry R. Hobbs,et al.  Interpretation as Abduction , 1993, Artif. Intell..

[16]  Roger J. Kreuz,et al.  Empirical Approaches to Literature and Aesthetics , 1996 .

[17]  P. Dixon,et al.  Literary communication: Effects of reader-narrator cooperation , 1996 .