Taking the Audio Out of Audio-CASI

Audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (audio-CASI or ACASI) has been widely adopted around the world as a method for eliciting more candid responses to sensitive questions in surveys. While few studies have explored the added advantages audio may bring over text-CASI, those that have (e.g., Tourangeau and Smith, 1996, Public Opinion Quarterly 60(2):275-304) found large effects for self administration over interviewer administration, but only modest additional gains from the audio enhancement. In this paper, we explore the use of audio-CASI versus text-CASI in a national survey of fertility-related issues in the United States (the National Survey of Family Growth). In the pretest, male and female respondents were randomly assigned to audio-CASI (n = 299) or text-CASI (n = 312). We compare the distributions of substantive responses between modes and examine a variety of paradata (e.g., keystroke files, time stamps) to examine the use of the CASI instruments. The main study, which interviewed 7,643 women and 4,928 men aged 15-44 in 2002-03, used audio-CASI only, but again we have a variety of paradata and interviewer debriefing items to examine the extent to which subjects made use of the audio enhancements to CASI. Our results indicate that most respondents make limited use of the audio features of audio-CASI and accordingly the gains produced by this technology are modest relative to text-CASI.

[1]  R. Tourangeau,et al.  Fast times and easy questions: the effects of age, experience and question complexity on web survey response times , 2008 .

[2]  R. Tourangeau,et al.  Sensitive questions in surveys. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Kari Kallinen,et al.  Comparing speakers versus headphones in listening to news from a computer - individual differences and psychophysiological responses , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Karen E Davis,et al.  National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle 6: sample design, weighting, imputation, and variance estimation. , 2006, Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research.

[5]  K. Ghanem,et al.  Audio computer assisted self interview and face to face interview modes in assessing response bias among STD clinic patients , 2005, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[6]  Thorkild Tylleskär,et al.  Audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) may avert socially desirable responses about infant feeding in the context of HIV , 2005, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[7]  D. O'Rourke,et al.  An Investigation of the Effects of Social Desirability on the Validity of Self-Reports of Cancer Screening Behaviors , 2005, Medical care.

[8]  M. Koenig,et al.  Does Audio-CASI improve reports of risky behavior? Evidence from a randomized field trial among young urban men in India. , 2005, Studies in family planning.

[9]  P. Hewett,et al.  Consistency in the reporting of sexual behavior among adolescent girls in Kenya: A comparison of interviewing methods , 2003 .

[10]  Don C Des Jarlais,et al.  Audio-computerized self-interviewing versus face-to-face interviewing for research data collection at drug abuse treatment programs. , 2004, Addiction.

[11]  J. Strickler,et al.  Measuring Induced Abortion in Mexico , 2004 .

[12]  M. Bellis,et al.  Sexual behaviour of young people in international tourist resorts , 2004, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[13]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Does Voice Matter? An Interactive Voice Response (IVR) Experiment , 2004 .

[14]  Mick P. Couper,et al.  Race in the Live and the Virtual Interview: Racial Deference, Social Desirability, and Activation Effects in Attitude Surveys , 2003 .

[15]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Understanding the Effects of Audio-CASI on Self-Reports of Sensitive Behavior , 2003 .

[16]  Kerstin E. E. Schroder,et al.  Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: II. Accuracy of self-reports , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[17]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Speech-Based Disclosure Systems: Effects of Modality, Gender of Prompt, and Gender of User , 2003, Int. J. Speech Technol..

[18]  Phillip Cooley,et al.  The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[19]  C. Manopaiboon,et al.  Rapid assessment of sexual behavior, drug use, human immunodeficiency virus, and sexually transmitted diseases in northern thai youth using audio-computer-assisted self-interviewing and noninvasive specimen collection. , 2001, Pediatrics.

[20]  Charles F. Turner,et al.  Using touch screen audio-CASI to obtain data on sensitive topics , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Larry A. Kroutil,et al.  Mode Effects in Self-Reported Mental Health Data , 2001 .

[22]  J. H. van de Wijgert,et al.  Is audio computer-assisted self-interviewing a feasible method of surveying in Zimbabwe? , 2000, International journal of epidemiology.

[23]  D S Metzger,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. HIVNET Vaccine Preparedness Study Protocol Team. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[24]  R. Rusek,et al.  A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing. , 2000, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[25]  W. Aquilino,et al.  Response Effects Due to Bystander Presence in CASI and Paper-and-Pencil Surveys of Drug Use and Alcohol Use , 2000, Substance use & misuse.

[26]  S. Schneider,et al.  Developing Usability Guidelines for AudioCasi Respondents with Limited Literacy Skills , 2000 .

[27]  Mick P. Couper,et al.  Completion of self‐administered questionnaires in a sex survey , 1999 .

[28]  Heather Miller,et al.  Audio-computer interviewing to measure risk behaviour for HIV among injecting drug users: a quasi-randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[29]  James N Gribble,et al.  Interview Mode and Measurement of Sexual Behaviors: Methodological Issues. , 1999, Journal of sex research.

[30]  B Gerbert,et al.  When asked, patients tell: disclosure of sensitive health-risk behaviors. , 1999, Medical care.

[31]  S. M. Rogers,et al.  The association between self-reports of abortion and breast cancer risk: fact or artifact , 1998 .

[32]  Susan M. Rogers,et al.  Automated Self-interviewing and the Survey Measurement of Sensitive Behaviors , 1998 .

[33]  S. M. Rogers,et al.  Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. , 1998, Science.

[34]  Tom W. Smith.  THE IMPACT OF THE PRESENCE OF OTHERS ON A RESPONDENT'S ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS , 1997 .

[35]  Tom W. Smith,et al.  ASKING SENSITIVE QUESTIONS THE IMPACT OF DATA COLLECTION MODE, QUESTION FORMAT, AND QUESTION CONTEXT , 1996 .

[36]  M. Couper,et al.  EVALUATION OF A COMPUTER-ASSISTED SELF-INTERVIEW COMPONENT IN A COMPUTER-ASSISTED PERSONAL INTERVIEW SURVEY , 1996 .

[37]  Jerome Johnston,et al.  Reducing Response Effects for Sensitive Questions: A Computer-Assisted Self Interview with Audio , 1995 .

[38]  Charles F Turner,et al.  AUDIO AND VIDEO COMPUTER-ASSISTED SELF INTERVIEWING: Preliminary Tests of New Technologies for Data Collection. , 1994, Journal of official statistics.