Strategies for Enhancing and Evaluating Interactivity in Web-Based Learning and Teaching

Interactivity is often discussed in constructivist approaches to education, which enable the student to evolve, understand, or construct new ideas from existing concepts. Constructivist approaches rely on active participation in the learning situation. Interaction and participation are crucial ingredients in the learning process. But interactivity, as a specific learning concept that underlies the general notions of interaction and participation, is not easily tracked and evaluated. This paper examines how to evaluate interactivity. It outlines a number of criteria and student activities to evaluate success in interactive web-based teaching. These theoretical issues are illustrated in the context of two linguistics courses that involve both web-based course delivery and face-to-face course delivery. Measures taken to achieve interactivity in these courses are discussed before proposing qualitative and quantitative criteria for evaluating interactivity. Teachers in higher education can encourage students to have a more positive attitude through effective ways of increasing interaction, such as structuring the learning environment in such a way as to achieve a 'conversational learning community', a learning model that promotes informal, relaxed, and interactive communities of learners and teachers.

[1]  Cláudio André Gondim Nogueira,et al.  Educational Services in Second Life: A Study Based on Flow Theory , 2011, Int. J. Web Based Learn. Teach. Technol..

[2]  Kamolbhan Olapiriyakul,et al.  A guide to establishing hybrid learning courses: Employing information technology to create a new learning experience, and a case study , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[3]  Adams Bodomo Interactivity in web-based courses , 2001 .

[4]  Mike Moore,et al.  Editorial: Distance education theory , 1991 .

[5]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Fostering Higher Knowledge Construction Levels in Online Discussion Forums: An Exploratory Case Study , 2010, Int. J. Web Based Learn. Teach. Technol..

[6]  Thomas A. Brush,et al.  Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Rod Sims,et al.  An interactive conundrum: Constructs of interactivity and learning theory , 2000 .

[8]  M. Moore The Theory of Transactional Distance , 2012, Handbook of Distance Education.

[9]  J. Bruner Toward a Theory of Instruction , 1966 .

[10]  George D. Magoulas,et al.  Advances in Web-based Education: Personalized Learning Environments , 2005 .

[11]  Lisa Dawley,et al.  The Tools for Successful Online Teaching , 2007 .

[12]  Adams Bodomo Interactivity in Web-Based Learning , 2006, Int. J. Web Based Learn. Teach. Technol..

[13]  S. Engel Thought and Language , 1964 .

[14]  Michael G. Moore Three types of interaction , 1993 .

[15]  A Constructivist Dialogue. , 1994 .

[16]  Adams Bodomo,et al.  Instructional Interactivity in a Web-Based Learning Community , 2008 .

[17]  J. Bruner Actual minds, possible worlds , 1985 .

[18]  Jane Eberle,et al.  Web Accessibility Essentials for Online Course Developers , 2010 .

[19]  M. Moore Editorial: Three types of interaction , 1989 .

[20]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Implementing and Sustaining E-Learning in the Workplace , 2008, Int. J. Web Based Learn. Teach. Technol..

[21]  K. Frank,et al.  The Social Life of Technology: An Ecological Analysis of Technology Diffusion in Schools , 2006 .

[22]  So-Young Kim,et al.  Integrated Design of Web-Platform, Offline Supports, and Evaluation System for the Successful Implementation of University 2.0 , 2010 .

[23]  Carol Kahan Kennedy,et al.  An Evaluation of Blending Technology with Pedagogy for Teacher Education and its Implication for their Classroom Teaching , 2009, Int. J. Web Based Learn. Teach. Technol..

[24]  Lev Vygotsky Mind in society , 1978 .

[25]  Mark Keegan Optimizing the Instructional Moment: A Guide to Using Socratic, Didactic, Inquiry, and Discovery Methods. , 1993 .

[26]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology , 1993 .

[27]  Jennifer K. Holtz,et al.  A Didactic Model for the Development of Effective Online Science Courses , 2008 .

[28]  Paulo Freire,et al.  The Adult Literacy Process as Cultural Action for Freedom. , 1970 .

[29]  J. Bruner Child's Talk: Learning to Use Language , 1985 .

[30]  Rod Sims,et al.  Interactivity on stage: Strategies for learner-designer communication , 1999 .

[31]  Adams Bodomo,et al.  Evaluating interactivity in web-based learning , 2003 .

[32]  José Palazzo Moreira de Oliveira,et al.  Modeling Learner's Cognitive Abilities in the Context of a Web-Based Learning Environment , 2008 .

[33]  Adams Bodomo Constructing Knowledge through Online Bulletin Board Discussions , 2005 .

[34]  Jean Piaget,et al.  To Understand Is to Invent , 1973 .

[35]  Charles R. Graham BLENDED LEARNING SYSTEMS: DEFINITION, CURRENT TRENDS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 2005 .

[36]  G. Pask Conversation, Cognition and Learning , 1975 .

[37]  Mara Nikolaidou,et al.  The Blended Learning Ecosystem of an Academic Institution in Greece , 2010, Int. J. Web Based Learn. Teach. Technol..

[38]  J. Bruner Acts of meaning , 1990 .

[39]  Monika Mital,et al.  Does Technology Uptake Convert to Effectiveness: Re-Evaluating E-Learning Effectiveness , 2010, Int. J. Web Based Learn. Teach. Technol..

[40]  Diana Laurillard Multimedia and the changing experience of the learner , 1995, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[41]  Angie Parker,et al.  Interaction in Distance Education: The Critical Conversation. , 1999 .