Development of a three-dimensional surface imaging system for melanocytic skin lesion evaluation

Abstract. Even though surface morphology is always taken into account when assessing clinically pigmented skin lesions, it is not captured by most modern imaging systems using digital imaging. Our aim is to develop a novel three-dimensional (3D) imaging technique to record detailed information of the surface anatomy of melanocytic lesions that will enable improved classification through digital imaging. The apparatus consists of three high-resolution cameras, a light source, and accompanying software. Volume measurements of specific phantoms using volumetric tubes render slightly lower values than those obtained by our 3D imaging system (mean%±SD, 3.8%±0.98, P<0.05). To examine the reproducibility of the method, sequential imaging of melanocytic lesions is carried out. The mean%±SD differences of area, major axis length, volume, and maximum height are 2.1%±1.1, 0.9%±0.8, 3.8%±2.9, and 2.5%±3.5, respectively. Thirty melanocytic lesions are assessed, including common and dysplastic nevi and melanomas. There is a significant difference between nevi and melanomas in terms of variance in height and boundary asymmetry (P<0.001). Moreover, dysplastic nevi have significantly higher variances in pigment density values than common nevi (P<0.001). Preliminary data suggest that our instrument has great potential in the evaluation of the melanocytic lesions. However, these findings should be confirmed in larger-scale studies.

[1]  David E Elder,et al.  Dysplastic naevi: an update , 2010, Histopathology.

[2]  Gail M Williams,et al.  Reduced melanoma after regular sunscreen use: randomized trial follow-up. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Roberto Cipolla,et al.  Multi-view stereo via volumetric graph-cuts , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[4]  Despina Ioannidou,et al.  Epidemiological differences for cutaneous melanoma in a relatively dark-skinned Caucasian population with chronic sun exposure. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[5]  William J Blot,et al.  Sunlight and reduced risk of cancer: is the real story vitamin D? , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  Natale Cascinelli,et al.  An Evidence‐based Staging System for Cutaneous Melanoma 1 , 2004, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  H. Kittler,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy/dermatoscopy , 2004 .

[8]  C. Balas,et al.  A novel optical imaging method for the early detection, quantitative grading, and mapping of cancerous and precancerous lesions of cervix , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  R U Peter,et al.  PREVALENCE OF DYSPLASTIC NEVI IN HEALTHY YOUNG MEN , 1992, International journal of dermatology.

[10]  Kristalia Melessanaki,et al.  Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy and hyper-spectral imaging analysis of pigments on an illuminated manuscript , 2001 .

[11]  Hans P. Moravec Towards Automatic Visual Obstacle Avoidance , 1977, IJCAI.

[12]  Emily White,et al.  A cohort study of vitamin D intake and melanoma risk. , 2009, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[13]  Bruce Kupelnick,et al.  Use of topical sunscreens and the risk of malignant melanoma: a meta-analysis of 9067 patients from 11 case-control studies. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[14]  Jorge Ripoll,et al.  Prehistological evaluation of benign and malignant pigmented skin lesions with optical computed tomography. , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.

[15]  Eva Negri,et al.  Mortality from cutaneous malignant melanoma in Europe. Has the epidemic levelled off? , 2004, Melanoma research.

[16]  L. Dennis,et al.  Sunscreen Use and the Risk for Melanoma: A Quantitative Review , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  S. Menzies,et al.  Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta‐analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting , 2008, The British journal of dermatology.

[18]  Hensin Tsao,et al.  Melanoma and genetics. , 2009, Clinics in dermatology.

[19]  Claus Garbe,et al.  The incidence and mortality of cutaneous melanoma in southern Germany , 2006, Cancer.

[20]  J. Mayer,et al.  Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of dermatoscopy in detecting malignant melanoma , 1997, The Medical journal of Australia.

[21]  H Kamino,et al.  Precision of automatic measurements of pigmented skin lesion parameters with a MelaFindTM multispectral digital dermoscope , 2000, Melanoma research.

[22]  W. Clark,et al.  Dysplastic nevus syndrome: A phenotypic association of sporadic cutaneous melanoma , 1980, Cancer.

[23]  E. Parzen On Estimation of a Probability Density Function and Mode , 1962 .

[24]  Thomas Morrow MelaFind improves chances for accurate melanoma diagnosis. , 2010, Managed care.

[25]  Pau Klein,et al.  San Francisco, California , 2007 .

[26]  Manolis I. A. Lourakis,et al.  SBA: A software package for generic sparse bundle adjustment , 2009, TOMS.

[27]  F. A. van den Heuvel,et al.  MEDPHOS : A NEW PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SYSTEM FOR MEDICAL MEASUREMENT , 2004 .

[28]  Robert T. Collins,et al.  A space-sweep approach to true multi-image matching , 1996, Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[29]  Claus Garbe,et al.  Melanoma epidemiology and trends. , 2009, Clinics in dermatology.

[30]  W. Clark,et al.  PRECURSOR NAEVI IN CUTANEOUS MALIGNANT MELANOMA: A PROPOSED NOMENCLATURE , 1980, The Lancet.

[31]  Nicholas G Martin,et al.  A population-based study of Australian twins with melanoma suggests a strong genetic contribution to liability. , 2009, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[32]  Ralph Braun,et al.  The performance of SolarScan: an automated dermoscopy image analysis instrument for the diagnosis of primary melanoma. , 2005, Archives of dermatology.

[33]  H Kerl,et al.  Sensitivity in the clinical diagnosis of malignant melanoma , 1994, Melanoma research.