Neural synergy in visual grouping: when good continuation meets common fate

A modified version of the 'path finder' display consisting of many small oriented Gabor patches was used to study the joint contributions of spatial and temporal structures to shape perception. A two-interval forced-choice procedure measured detectability of curved 'paths' defined by orientation ('good continuation') and/or by temporal synchrony of change in motion direction ('common fate'). When orientation was completely random (no spatial 'path' cue) temporal synchrony still supported reliable performance, but only when correlation of change among 'path' elements was high. When combined, these two weak spatial and temporal structures yielded performance in excess of probability summation: 'paths' weakly defined by orientation were highly conspicuous when the constituent Gabors underwent synchronized changes in direction of motion, even though the individual directions of path elements were uncorrelated. Spatial grouping from temporal structure may arise from correlated transients associated with synchronized changes in motion direction. Evidently these two mechanisms for promotion of spatial grouping interact synergistically.

[1]  K. Koffka.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[2]  C D Gilbert,et al.  Circuitry, architecture, and functional dynamics of visual cortex. , 1993, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  R. Blake,et al.  Visual features that vary together over time group together over space , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Ennio Mingolla,et al.  Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations , 1985 .

[5]  P. Kellman,et al.  A theory of visual interpolation in object perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[7]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision , 1997, Nature.

[8]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Long-range horizontal connections and their role in cortical reorganization revealed by optical recording of cat primary visual cortex , 1995, Nature.

[9]  J. Movshon,et al.  Cortical oscillatory responses do not affect visual segmentation , 1996, Vision Research.

[10]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap confidence intervals and bootstrap approximations , 1987 .

[11]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. , 1991, Vision research.

[12]  D. Regan,et al.  Dissociation of orientation discrimination from form detection for motion-defined bars and luminance-defined bars: Effects of dot lifetime and presentation duration , 1992, Vision Research.

[13]  W. Singer,et al.  Functional Specificity of Long-Range Intrinsic and Interhemispheric Connections in the Visual Cortex of Strabismic Cats , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  C. Gray.  The Temporal Correlation Hypothesis of Visual Feature Integration Still Alive and Well , 1999, Neuron.

[15]  UTE LEONARDS,et al.  The Influence of Temporal Phase Differences on Texture Segmentation , 1996, Vision Research.

[16]  D G Pelli,et al.  Pixel independence: measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[17]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[18]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Synchrony Unbound A Critical Evaluation of the Temporal Binding Hypothesis , 1999, Neuron.

[19]  W. Newsome,et al.  The Variable Discharge of Cortical Neurons: Implications for Connectivity, Computation, and Information Coding , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[21]  A. Hayes,et al.  Apparent position governs contour–element binding by the visual system , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Orientation Selectivity and the Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Striate Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Victor A. F. Lamme.  The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  I Kovács,et al.  A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Pieter R Roelfsema,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(98)00222-3 , 1998 .

[26]  D. Hubel,et al.  Microsaccadic eye movements and firing of single cells in the striate cortex of macaque monkeys , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  O. Reiser,et al.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[28]  R Blake,et al.  Visual form created solely from temporal structure. , 1999, Science.

[29]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Phantom contours: A new class of visual patterns that selectively activates the magnocellular pathway in man , 1991 .

[30]  N. Graham.  Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[31]  C. Koch,et al.  Spatial displacement, but not temporal asynchrony, destroys figural binding , 1995, Vision Research.

[32]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Filtering Reveals Form in Temporally Structured Displays , 1999 .

[33]  Marius Usher,et al.  Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception , 1998, Nature.