Entry and Patenting in the Software Industry

To what extent are firms kept out of a market by patents covering related technologies? Do patents held by potential entrants make it easier to enter markets? We estimate the empirical relationship between market entry and patents for 27 narrowly defined categories of software products during the period 1990--2004. Controlling for demand, market structure, average patent quality, and other factors, we find that a 10% increase in the number of patents relevant to market reduces the rate of entry by 3%--8%, and this relationship intensified following expansions in the patentability of software in the mid-1990s. However, potential entrants with patent applications relevant to a market are more likely to enter it. Finally, patents appear to substitute for complementary assets in the entry process, because patents have both greater entry-deterring and entry-promoting effects for firms without prior experience in other markets. This paper was accepted by Bruno Cassiman, business strategy.

[1]  A. Bright,et al.  The electric-lamp industry , 1949 .

[2]  Steven R. Lerman,et al.  The Estimation of Choice Probabilities from Choice Based Samples , 1977 .

[3]  E. Mansfield,et al.  Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study , 1981 .

[4]  S. Klepper,et al.  Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations , 1982 .

[5]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Post-Entry Competition in the Plain Paper Copier Market : American Economic Review , 1985 .

[6]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Industry Effects and Appropriability Measures in the Stock Markets Valuation of R&D and Patents , 1987 .

[7]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[8]  W. T. Robinson Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages: The Case of Industrial Goods Industries , 1988 .

[9]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  Patterns of Firm Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing Industries , 1988 .

[10]  Paul Geroski,et al.  Entry And The Rate of Innovation , 1991 .

[11]  Gary Chamberlain,et al.  Comment: Sequential Moment Restrictions in Panel Data , 1992 .

[12]  Steven T. Berry Estimation of a Model of Entry in the Airline Industry , 1992 .

[13]  Bronwyn H. Hall,et al.  The Stock Market's Valuation of R&D Investment during the 1980's , 1993 .

[14]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[15]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[16]  J. Angrist,et al.  Two-Stage Least Squares Estimation of Average Causal Effects in Models with Variable Treatment Intensity , 1995 .

[17]  P. Geroski What do we know about entry , 1995 .

[18]  William H. Greene,et al.  Gender Economics Courses in Liberal Arts Colleges: Further Results , 1998 .

[19]  S. Greenstein,et al.  The Product Life Cycle in the Commercial Mainframe Computer Market, 1968-1982 , 1998 .

[20]  B. Silverman Technological Resources and the Direction of Corporate Diversification: Toward an Integration of the Resource-Based View and Transaction Cost Economics , 1998 .

[21]  B. Silverman Technological Resources and the Direction of Corporate Diversification: Toward an Integration of the Resource-Based View and Transaction Cost Economics , 1998 .

[22]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations , 1998 .

[23]  F. Morton,et al.  Entry decisions in the generic pharmaceutical industry. , 1999, The Rand journal of economics.

[24]  J. Wooldridge Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models , 1999 .

[25]  Richard Blundell,et al.  Individual effects and dynamics in count data models , 2002 .

[26]  Carl Shapiro,et al.  Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting , 2000, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[27]  David H. Hsu,et al.  When Does Start-Up Innovation Spur the Gale of Creative Destruction? , 2000 .

[28]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[29]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history , 2002 .

[30]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[31]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2002 .

[32]  J. Gans,et al.  The Product Market and the Market for 'Ideas': Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs , 2002 .

[33]  Marco S. Giarratana The birth of a new industry: entry by start-ups and the drivers of firm growth: The case of encryption software , 2004 .

[34]  Robert M. Hunt,et al.  An Empirical Look at Software Patents , 2004 .

[35]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2004 .

[36]  Ronald J. Mann,et al.  Do Patents Facilitate Financing in the Software Industry? , 2005 .

[37]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry , 2004 .

[38]  M. Reitzig Strategic Management of Intellectual Property , 2004 .

[39]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Innovation and its Discontents , 2004 .

[40]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 2004 .

[41]  S. Mann,et al.  Innovation and Intellectual Property Protection in the Software Industry: An Emerging Role for Patents? , 2004 .

[42]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis Don't Fence Me in: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[43]  Stephen A. Merrill A PATENT SYSTEM FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY Statement of , 2005 .

[44]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[45]  R. Levin,et al.  A patent system for the 21st Century , 2005 .

[46]  Leonard Berkowitz,et al.  Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress and What to Do about It , 2005 .

[47]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 2—Spring 2005—Pages 75–98 Probabilistic Patents , 2022 .

[48]  R. Hunt,et al.  When Do More Patents Reduce R&D? , 2006 .

[49]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[50]  R. Merges Patents, Entry and Growth in the Software Industry , 2006 .

[51]  M. Kyle The Role of Firm Characteristics in Pharmaceutical Product Launches , 2006 .

[52]  John M. de Figueiredo,et al.  Surviving the Gales of Creative Destruction: The Determinants of Product Turnover , 2005 .

[53]  Megan J. MacGarvie,et al.  The Private Value of Software Patents , 2006 .

[54]  Megan J. MacGarvie,et al.  Patents, Thickets and the Financing of Early-Stage Firms: Evidence from the Software Industry , 2007 .

[55]  Ronald J. Mann,et al.  Software Patents, Incumbents, and Entry , 2007 .

[56]  Stefan Wagner,et al.  Patents and the Survival of Internet-Related Ipos , 2007 .

[57]  Ronald J. Mann,et al.  Patents, Venture Capital, and Software Start-Ups , 2007 .

[58]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Applicant and Examiner Citations in US Patents: An Overview and Analysis , 2008 .

[59]  David H. Hsu,et al.  PATENTS AS QUALITY SIGNALS FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL VENTURES. , 2008 .

[60]  James E. Bessen,et al.  Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk , 2008 .

[61]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  Reprinted Article The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995 , 2009 .

[62]  J. H. Cole Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk , 2009 .

[63]  H. Ju,et al.  Competitive Strategy , 2012 .