THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL POWER FUNCTIONS

Data in operant conditioning and psychophysics are often well fitted by functions of the form y — qx'. A simple theory derives these power functions from the simultaneous equations dx/x = aif(z)dz and dy/y = a j ( z ) d z , where z is a comparison variable that is equated for the effects of x and y, and Oj and a2 are sensitivity parameters. In operant conditioning, * and y are identified with response rates; in psychophysics, with measures of stimulus and response. The theory can explain converging sets of power functions, solves the dimensional problems with the standard power function, and can account for the relation between Type I and Type II psychophysical scales.

[1]  Warren S. Torgerson,et al.  Distances and ratios in psychophysical scaling , 1961 .

[2]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Sequential dependencies and response range in cross-modality matches of duration to loudness , 1975 .

[3]  L. D. Byrd Contrasting effects of morphine on schedule-controlled behavior in the chimpanzee and baboon. , 1975, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[4]  D. M. MacKay,et al.  Psychophysics of Perceived Intensity: A Theoretical Basis for Fechner's and Stevens' Laws , 1963, Science.

[5]  D. M. Green,et al.  Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  J A Nevin,et al.  On the form of the relation between response rates in a multiple schedule. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  J. Leander Rate-dependent Effects of drugs. II. effects of some major tranquilizers on multiple fixed-ratio, fixed-interval schedule performance. , 1975, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[8]  S. S. Stevens On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[9]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Brightness function: effects of adaptation. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  L. Marks Stimulus-range, number of categories, and form of the category-scale. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.

[11]  Edward Bradford Titchener,et al.  Experimental psychology: A manual of laboratory practice, Vol 1: Qualitative experiments: Part II. Instructor's manual. , 1901 .

[12]  M. Stitzer Comparison of morphine and chlorpromazine effects on moderately and severely suppressed punished responding in the pigeon. , 1974, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[13]  H. Lane,et al.  Ratio Scales, Category Scales, and Variability in the Production of Loudness and Softness , 1963 .

[14]  L. D. Byrd,et al.  Mathematics underlying the rate-dependency hypothesis. , 1977, Science.

[15]  P. Dews Studies on behavior. IV. Stimulant actions of methamphetamine. , 1958, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[16]  J. Falmagne The generalized Fechner problem and discrimination , 1971 .

[17]  D. Krantz Integration of just-noticeable differences , 1971 .

[18]  D. J. Mcfarland Time-Sharing as a Behavioral Phenomenon , 1974 .

[19]  S. Parker,et al.  The perceptual basis of loudness ratio judgments , 1976 .

[20]  D. McMillan Drugs and punished responding. I. Rate-dependent effects under multiple schedules. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[21]  D J McFarland,et al.  The behavioural final common path. , 1975, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  Conjunctive schedules of reinforcement. I. Rate-dependent effects of pentobarbital and d-amphetamine. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[23]  G. Wenger,et al.  The effects of phencyclidine, ketamine, delta-amphetamine and pentobarbital on schedule-controlled behavior in the mouse. , 1976, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[24]  J. Mckearney Rate-dependent effects of drugs: modification by discriminative stimuli of the effects of amobarbital on schedule-controlled behavior. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[25]  D. W. Curtis,et al.  Input and output transformations from magnitude estimation. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  H. Eisler A GENERAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION IN PSYCHO‐PHYSICS: DERIVATION AND EMPIRICAL TEST , 1963 .

[27]  D. Sanger,et al.  Effects of d-amphetamine on the behavior of pigeons maintained by a second-order schedule of reinforcement. , 1975, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[28]  Hannes Eisler,et al.  On theoretical and realizable ideal conditions in psychophysics: Magnitude and category scales and their relation , 1974 .

[29]  E. Boring,et al.  The derivation of subjective scales from just noticeable differences. , 1958, Psychological review.

[30]  T. Indow Scaling of Saturation and Hue Shift: Summary of Results and Implications , 1974 .

[31]  R. Luce,et al.  What sort of measurement is psychophysical measurement? , 1972, The American psychologist.

[32]  I. Pollack The Effect of White Noise on the Loudness of Speech of Assigned Average Level , 1949 .

[33]  H. Babkoff Magnitude estimation of short electrocutaneous pulses , 1976, Psychological research.

[34]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Sensation and Measurement , 1974, Springer Netherlands.

[35]  J. W. Atkinson,et al.  On the dynamics of action. , 1970, Nederlands tijdschrift voor de psychologie en haar grensgebieden.

[36]  C. Auerbach Interdependence of Stevens' exponents and discriminability measures. , 1971 .

[37]  N. Anderson Chapter 8 – ALGEBRAIC MODELS IN PERCEPTION* , 1974 .

[38]  S. S. Stevens Power‐Group Transformations under Glare, Masking, and Recruitment , 1966 .

[39]  S S Stevens,et al.  Effect of glare angle on the brightness function for a small target. , 1965, Vision research.

[40]  M. Wayner,et al.  Schedule induced behavior in humans. , 1973, Physiology & behavior.

[41]  Michel Treisman,et al.  Sensory Scaling and the Psychophysical Law , 1964 .

[42]  L. Richardson,et al.  Loudness and Telephone Current , 1930 .

[43]  On Facts and Theories in Psychophysics: Does Ekman’s Law Exist? , 1974 .

[44]  A. Parducci Chapter 5 – CONTEXTUAL EFFECTS: A RANGE–FREQUENCY ANALYSIS* , 1974 .

[45]  G. Ekman,et al.  Is the Power Law a Special Case of Fechner's Law? , 1964, Perceptual and motor skills.

[46]  P. Killeen On the temporal control of behavior. , 1975 .

[47]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  SPATIAL SUMMATION IN THE WARMTH SENSE , 1974 .

[48]  J. Staddon,et al.  Sequential and Temporal Properties of Behavior Induced By a Schedule of Periodic Food Delivery , 1975 .

[49]  M. Marr Effects of chlorpromazine in the pigeon under a second-order schedule of food presentation. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[50]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[51]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  On scales of sensation: Prolegomena to any future psychophysics that will be able to come forth as science , 1974 .

[52]  J. Nevin Response strength in multiple schedules. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[53]  L. Gollub,et al.  A detailed analysis of the effects of d-amphetamine on behavior under fixed-interval schedules. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[54]  Hannes Eisler,et al.  Magnitude scales, category scales, and Fechnerian integration. , 1963 .

[55]  J. Phillips A Note on Treisman's Model , 1964 .

[56]  John A. Nevin,et al.  RESPONSE STRENGTH IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES1 , 1974 .

[57]  Fred Attneave,et al.  Perception and related areas. , 1962 .

[58]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Handbook of Operant Behavior , 2022 .

[59]  Willem A. Wagenaar,et al.  Stevens vs Fechner: A plea for dismissal of the case , 1975 .

[60]  John E. R. Staddon,et al.  Temporal control on periodic schedules: Fine structure , 1975 .

[61]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Families of Converging Power Functions in Psychophysics , 1974 .

[62]  L. Gollub,et al.  Separating the effects of response rate and reinforcement frequency in the rate-dependent effects of amphetamine and scopolamine on the schedule-controlled performance of rats and pigeons. , 1975, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.