Variability of mixed DNA profiles separated on a 3130 and 3500 capillary electrophoresis instrument

In this paper, the variability of peak heights for mixed DNA profiles separated on two different models of a capillary electrophoresis instrument is examined. The Applied Biosystems 3500xl instrument produces larger peaks than the 3130xl instrument. If the relative difference in peak heights between the two instruments was a constant factor then all relative heights should be preserved. However, if that factor differed, say, for small versus large peaks then relative heights would change. The effect of peak height and dye on the relative difference in peak height between injections of the same amplicon on a 3500xl and 3130xl instrument for a series of mixed DNA profiles using the Promega PowerPlex 21 multiplex is described. The ratio of peak heights between instrument models resulted in values up to four times higher on the 3500 compared with the 3130. The magnitude of this difference was shown to be dependent on the dye but not on the peak heights themselves. Relative parameters stutter, heterozygote balance, and mixture proportion were very similar between the two instrument models, indicating that the interpretation guidelines developed on one machine are likely to be transportable to different capillary electrophoresis instrument models and different machines of the same model.

[1]  Eric Buel,et al.  Forensic DNA typing by capillary electrophoresis using the ABI Prism 310 and 3100 genetic analyzers for STR analysis , 2004, Electrophoresis.

[2]  Peter Gill,et al.  A comparison of stochastic variation in mixed and unmixed casework and synthetic samples. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[3]  Peter Gill,et al.  High-throughput analysis using AmpFlSTR® Identifiler® with the Applied Biosystems 3500xl Genetic Analyser. , 2013, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[4]  John M. Butler,et al.  Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Methodology , 2011 .

[5]  Norah Rudin,et al.  Quality Assurance Standards for Forensic DNA Testing Laboratories , 2001 .

[6]  Jo-Anne Bright,et al.  Examination of the variability in mixed DNA profile parameters for the Identifiler multiplex. , 2010, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[7]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[8]  W R Mayr,et al.  DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[9]  Keith Inman,et al.  Run‐Specific Limits of Detection and Quantitation for STR‐based DNA Testing , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  J. Butler,et al.  NIST validation studies on the 3500 Genetic Analyzer , 2011 .

[11]  K. Mullis,et al.  Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. , 1987, Methods in enzymology.