A Novel Method for Safety Analysis of Cyber-Physical Systems—Application to a Ship Exhaust Gas Scrubber System

Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) represent a systems category developed and promoted in the maritime industry to automate functions and system operations. In this study, a novel Combinatorial Approach for Safety Analysis is presented, which addresses the traditional safety methods’ limitations by integrating System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA), Events Sequence Identification (ETI) and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA). The developed method results in the development of a detailed Fault Tree that captures the effects of both the physical components/subsystems and the software functions’ failures. The quantitative step of the method employs the components’ failure rates to calculate the top event failure rate along with importance metrics for identifying the most critical components/functions. This method is implemented for an exhaust gas open loop scrubber system safety analysis to estimate its failure rate and identify critical failures considering the baseline system configuration as well as various alternatives with advanced functions for monitoring and diagnostics. The results demonstrate that configurations with SOx sensor continuous monitoring or scrubber unit failure diagnosis/prognosis lead to significantly lower failure rate. Based on the analysis results, the advantages/disadvantages of the novel method are also discussed. This study also provides insights for better safety analysis of the CPSs.

[1]  Asgeir J. Sørensen,et al.  Towards supervisory risk control of autonomous ships , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Marilyn Wolf,et al.  Safety and Security in Cyber-Physical Systems and Internet-of-Things Systems , 2018, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  Ludovic Piètre-Cambacédès,et al.  A survey of approaches combining safety and security for industrial control systems , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Yiannis Papadopoulos,et al.  Application of the D3H2 Methodology for the Cost-Effective Design of Dependable Systems , 2016 .

[6]  Romanas Puisa,et al.  Unravelling causal factors of maritime incidents and accidents , 2018, Safety Science.

[7]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Expanding healthcare failure mode and effect analysis: A composite proactive risk analysis approach , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Alessio Calantropio The Use of UAVs for Performing Safety-Related Tasks at Post-Disaster and Non-Critical Construction Sites , 2019 .

[9]  Wei Zheng,et al.  An integrated hazard identification method based on the hierarchical colored petri net , 2016 .

[10]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  Validity and validation of safety-related quantitative risk analysis , 2016 .

[11]  Igor Dolgov Establishing Training and Certification Criteria for Visual Observers of Unmanned Aircraft Systems , 2018 .

[12]  Lin Zhao,et al.  An extended system-theoretic hazard analysis method for the safety of high-speed railway train control systems , 2017 .

[13]  Dana S. Scott,et al.  Finite Automata and Their Decision Problems , 1959, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[14]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Towards the development of a system-theoretic model for safety assessment of autonomous merchant vessels , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Uncertainty treatment in risk analysis of complex systems: The cases of STAMP and FRAM , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Martin Höst,et al.  Comparison of the FMEA and STPA safety analysis methods–a case study , 2019, Software Quality Journal.

[17]  Irina Panasiuk,et al.  The evaluation of investments efficiency of SOx scrubber installation , 2015 .

[18]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  An integrated approach to safety and security based on systems theory , 2014, CACM.

[19]  Evangelos Boulougouris,et al.  Cruise ships power plant optimisation and comparative analysis , 2020, Energy.

[20]  Alexandra Laiou,et al.  Safety Culture among Private and Professional Drivers in Norway and Greece: Examining the Influence of National Road Safety Culture , 2019 .

[21]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  Foundations and choice of risk metrics , 2014 .

[22]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  A systems approach to risk analysis of maritime operations , 2017 .

[23]  Gerasimos Theotokatos,et al.  Vulnerabilities and safety assurance methods in Cyber-Physical Systems: A comprehensive review , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Deriving verification objectives and scenarios for maritime systems using the systems-theoretic process analysis , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[25]  Martin Bergström,et al.  A systemic hazard analysis and management process for the concept design phase of an autonomous vessel , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[26]  Yiliu Liu,et al.  Combining system-theoretic process analysis and availability assessment: A subsea case study , 2019, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability.

[27]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Human-system concurrent task analysis for maritime autonomous surface ship operation and safety , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..