The Stellar Mass Tully-Fisher Relation to z = 1.2 from AEGIS

We combine newly measured rotation velocities, velocity dispersions, and stellar masses to construct stellar mass Tully-Fisher relations (M*TFRs) for 544 galaxies with strong emission lines at 0.1 < z < 1.2 from the All-Wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey (AEGIS) and the Deep Extragalactic Evolutionary Probe 2 (DEEP2) survey. The conventional M*TFR using only rotation velocity (Vrot) shows large scatter (~1.5 dex in velocity). The scatter and residuals are correlated with morphology in the sense that disturbed, compact, and major merger galaxies have lower velocities for their masses. We construct an M*TFR using the kinematic estimator S0.5, which is defined as 1/2 and accounts for disordered or noncircular motions through the gas velocity dispersion (σg). The new M*TFR, termed S0.5/M*TFR, is remarkably tight over 0.1 < z < 1.2, with no detectable evolution of its intercept or slope with redshift. The average best-fit relation has 0.47 dex scatter in stellar mass, corresponding to ~1.2 "magnitudes," assuming a constant mass-to-light ratio. Interestingly, the S0.5/M*TFR is consistent with the absorption-line-based stellar mass Faber-Jackson relation for nearby elliptical galaxies in terms of slope and intercept, which might suggest a physical connection between the two relations.

[1]  E. Gawiser,et al.  Systematic Uncertainties in Stellar Mass Estimation for Distinct Galaxy Populations , 2007, astro-ph/0701749.

[2]  E. L. Wright,et al.  The All-Wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey (AEGIS) Data Sets , 2006, astro-ph/0607355.

[3]  N. Vogt,et al.  A Survey of Galaxy Kinematics to Z ∼ 1 in the Tkrs/goods-n Field. I. Rotation and Dispersion Properties , 2006 .

[4]  N. Vogt,et al.  A Survey of Galaxy Kinematics to Z ∼ 1 in the Tkrs/goods-n Field. Ii. Evolution in the Tully-fisher Relation , 2006 .

[5]  A. Connolly,et al.  The Deep Evolutionary Exploratory Probe 2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: The Galaxy Luminosity Function to z ~ 1 , 2006 .

[6]  C. Conselice,et al.  AEGIS: Enhancement of Dust-enshrouded Star Formation in Close Galaxy Pairs and Merging Galaxies up to z ~ 1 , 2006, astro-ph/0607272.

[7]  Ages and metallicities of early-type galaxies in the SDSS: new insight into the physical origin of the colour-magnitude and the Mg2-sigmaV relations , 2006, astro-ph/0605300.

[8]  H. Flores,et al.  3D spectroscopy with VLT/GIRAFFE. I. The true Tully Fisher relationship at z ̃ 0.6 , 2006, astro-ph/0603563.

[9]  Carnegie-Mellon,et al.  A Merger-driven Scenario for Cosmological Disk Galaxy Formation , 2005, astro-ph/0503369.

[10]  S. McGaugh The Baryonic Tully-Fisher Relation of Galaxies with Extended Rotation Curves and the Stellar Mass of Rotating Galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0506750.

[11]  A. Connolly,et al.  The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: The Galaxy Luminosity Function to z ~ 1 , 2005, astro-ph/0506041.

[12]  J. Brinkmann,et al.  Dark Matter and Stellar Mass in the Luminous Regions of Disk Galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0504581.

[13]  R. Ellis,et al.  Evolution of the Near-Infrared Tully-Fisher Relation: Constraints on the Relationship between the Stellar and Total Masses of Disk Galaxies since z ~ 1 , 2005, astro-ph/0503597.

[14]  The Mass Assembly Histories of Galaxies of Various Morphologies in the GOODS Fields , 2005, astro-ph/0502204.

[15]  R. Bender,et al.  The Tully-Fisher relation at intermediate redshift ⋆,⋆⋆ , 2003, astro-ph/0309263.

[16]  P. Madau,et al.  A New Nonparametric Approach to Galaxy Morphological Classification , 2003, astro-ph/0311352.

[17]  G. Chabrier Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function , 2003, astro-ph/0304382.

[18]  E. Bell,et al.  The Optical and Near-Infrared Properties of Galaxies. I. Luminosity and Stellar Mass Functions , 2003, astro-ph/0302543.

[19]  Marc Davis,et al.  Science Objectives and Early Results of the DEEP2 Redshift Survey , 2002, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[20]  D. Fabricant,et al.  Physical Sources of Scatter in the Tully-Fisher Relation , 2002, astro-ph/0202111.

[21]  R. Wechsler,et al.  The Astrophysical Journal, in press Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 14/09/00 CONCENTRATIONS OF DARK HALOS FROM THEIR ASSEMBLY HISTORIES , 2001 .

[22]  E. Bell,et al.  Stellar Mass-to-Light Ratios and the Tully-Fisher Relation , 2000, astro-ph/0008056.

[23]  M. Geller,et al.  The Tully-Fisher Relation as a Measure of Luminosity Evolution: A Low-Redshift Baseline for Evolving Galaxies , 2000, astro-ph/0011022.

[24]  C. Pritchet,et al.  Internal Kinematics of Field Galaxies at Intermediate Redshifts , 1998 .

[25]  D. Spergel,et al.  The Formation of Disk Galaxies , 1996, astro-ph/9611226.

[26]  S. White,et al.  A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering , 1996, astro-ph/9611107.

[27]  C. Pritchet,et al.  Internal Kinematics of Galaxies at z=0.25-0.45 , 1996, astro-ph/9606006.

[28]  E. Bertin,et al.  SExtractor: Software for source extraction , 1996 .

[29]  S. Faber,et al.  Contraction of Dark Matter Galactic Halos Due to Baryonic Infall , 1986 .