Ultralow-power LSI Technology with Silicon on Thin Buried Oxide (SOTB) CMOSFET

For a variety of applications from mobile to high-performance computing, the power consumption of very-large-scale-integrated (VLSI) circuits is a serious issue. The scaling rule has been a paradigm for miniaturizing complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) field-effect-transistors (FETs) in VLSI circuits for a long period. In the ideal scaling rule, the supply voltage Vdd should decrease in proportion to the miniaturization of the transistor. This Vdd reduction has roughly been successful so far. In extremely scaled transistors such as those in the 45-nm logic node and beyond, however, it is very difficult to further decrease Vdd. Unless Vdd is reduced with the scaling rule, the power consumption of the LSI will increase significantly due to an increase in both operational and standby-leakage power (Sakurai, 2004; Chen, 2006). The primary cause of this difficulty is widely recognized as the increase in threshold voltage (Vth) variation of CMOSFETs, because Vdd should be set higher considering the margin to the increased Vth variation (Takeuchi et al., 1997). Variation of transistor characteristics, primarily Vth variation, is increasing substantially in sub-100-nm technologies. This makes the Vdd reduction, required by the scaling rule, difficult, and significantly increases the power consumption of an LSI chip. Here, power consumption P of an inverter, which is the representative LSI unit circuit, is defined as

[1]  T. Iwamatsu,et al.  Smallest Vth variability achieved by intrinsic silicon on thin BOX (SOTB) CMOS with single metal gate , 2008, 2008 Symposium on VLSI Technology.

[2]  S. Maegawa,et al.  Silicon on thin BOX: a new paradigm of the CMOSFET for low-power high-performance application featuring wide-range back-bias control , 2004, IEDM Technical Digest. IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 2004..

[3]  K. Imai,et al.  Design Methodology of Body-Biasing Scheme for Low Power System LSI With Multi- $V_{\rm th}$ Transistors , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[4]  K. Takeuchi,et al.  Channel engineering for the reduction of random-dopant-placement-induced threshold voltage fluctuation , 1997, International Electron Devices Meeting. IEDM Technical Digest.

[5]  Y. Yasuda,et al.  Ultra-low standby power (U-LSTP) 65-nm node CMOS technology utilizing HfSiON dielectric and body-biasing scheme , 2005, Digest of Technical Papers. 2005 Symposium on VLSI Technology, 2005..

[6]  R. Tsuchiya,et al.  Comprehensive study on vth variability in silicon on Thin BOX (SOTB) CMOS with small random-dopant fluctuation: Finding a way to further reduce variation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting.

[7]  Nobuyuki Sugii,et al.  Wide-Range Threshold Voltage Controllable Silicon on Thin Buried Oxide Integrated with Bulk Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor Featuring Fully Silicided NiSi Gate Electrode , 2008 .

[8]  Nobuyuki Sugii,et al.  Silicon on thin BOX (SOTB) CMOS for ultralow standby power with forward-biasing performance booster , 2008 .

[9]  A. Asenov,et al.  Intrinsic parameter fluctuations in decananometer MOSFETs introduced by gate line edge roughness , 2003 .

[10]  T. Sugii,et al.  Direct measurement of V/sub th/ fluctuation caused by impurity positioning , 2000, 2000 Symposium on VLSI Technology. Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.00CH37104).

[11]  Takayasu Sakurai,et al.  Perspectives of Low-Power VLSI's , 2004 .

[12]  Tze-Chiang Chen,et al.  Where CMOS is Going: Trendy Hype vs. Real Technology , 2006, IEEE Solid-State Circuits Newsletter.

[13]  A. Chou,et al.  High performance CMOS fabricated on hybrid substrate with different crystal orientations , 2003, IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 2003.

[14]  T. Numata,et al.  Experimental evidences of quantum-mechanical effects on low-field mobility, gate-channel capacitance, and threshold voltage of ultrathin body SOI MOSFETs , 2001, International Electron Devices Meeting. Technical Digest (Cat. No.01CH37224).

[15]  R. Tsuchiya,et al.  Low voltage (Vdd∼0.6 V) SRAM operation achieved by reduced threshold voltage variability in SOTB (silicon on thin BOX) , 2006, 2009 Symposium on VLSI Technology.

[16]  Takahiro Seki,et al.  Dynamic voltage and frequency management for a low-power embedded microprocessor , 2005, 2004 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37519).

[17]  A. Toriumi,et al.  Experimental study of threshold voltage fluctuation due to statistical variation of channel dopant number in MOSFET's , 1994 .

[18]  X. Garros,et al.  FDSOI devices with thin BOX and ground plane integration for 32nm node and below , 2008, ESSDERC 2008 - 38th European Solid-State Device Research Conference.

[19]  G. Moore Are we really ready for VLSI2? , 1979, 1979 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers.

[20]  J. Conner,et al.  Performance and Variability Comparisons between Multi-Gate FETs and Planar SOI Transistors , 2006, 2006 International Electron Devices Meeting.

[21]  E. Deloffre,et al.  FDSOI devices with thin BOX and ground plane integration for 32nm node and below , 2008 .

[22]  G. Ono,et al.  A 1000-MIPS/W microprocessor using speed adaptive threshold-voltage CMOS with forward bias , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.00CH37056).

[23]  S. Locorotondo,et al.  Dual Work Function Phase Controlled Ni-FUSI CMOS (NiSi NMOS, Ni2Si or Ni31Si12 PMOS): Manufacturability, Reliability & Process Window Improvement by Sacrificial SiGe Cap , 2006, 2006 Symposium on VLSI Technology, 2006. Digest of Technical Papers..

[24]  N. Sugii,et al.  Local $V_{\rm th}$ Variability and Scalability in Silicon-on-Thin-BOX (SOTB) CMOS With Small Random-Dopant Fluctuation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[25]  Marcel J. M. Pelgrom,et al.  Matching properties of MOS transistors , 1989 .

[26]  Kenji Natori,et al.  Analysis of the drain breakdown mechanism in ultra-thin-film SOI MOSFETs , 1990 .