On the efficacy of current biosecurity measures at EU borders to prevent the transfer of zoonotic and livestock diseases by travellers

Although many animal diseases have been eradicated from the European Union (EU), the animal production sectors in the EU are still under a major threat of disease pathogens introduced by travellers into a country through illegal importation of wildlife or production animals, and/or food products of animal origin. These may carry (exotic) pathogens or toxic metabolites that are hazardous for public health and have a zoonotic potential. According to experts, newly emerging diseases will most probably be zoonotic in nature. The control systems and inspection measures at the borders are, in general, sufficient to control the import of disease pathogens through commercial consignments, as regularly reported by the Food and Veterinary Office (FVO). The Schengen Agreement in the EU has pushed such inspections to the outer borders of the EU in the context of freedom of movement of ‘goods’ – including live animals and foods of animal origin – people and services within the EU (Treaty of Rome). However, it is questionable whether this policy and the inspection measures taken are effective in reducing public and animal health risks in the EU to an acceptable level. Risk assessment studies point to the potential dangers of illegal imports by travellers. This review article discusses the current status quo and more, in particular, the weaknesses of the current inspection procedures related to biosecurity and suggestions for improvement are made.

[1]  Netherlands rabies case highlights importance of following pet travel rules , 2012, Veterinary Record.

[2]  F. Smulders,et al.  Welfare of production animals: assessment and management of risks , 2009 .

[3]  Griffin,et al.  Overview of methods for source attribution for human illness from food-borne microbiological hazards , 2008 .

[4]  J. Noordhuizen,et al.  [Applying HACCP-based quality risk management on dairy farms]. , 2007, Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde.

[5]  A. Müller,et al.  Trichinellosis outbreak in Bavaria caused by cured sausage from Romania, January 2007. , 2007, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[6]  W. Heneine,et al.  Frequent Simian Foamy Virus Infection in Persons Occupationally Exposed to Nonhuman Primates , 2004, Journal of Virology.

[7]  W. Laegreid,et al.  Correlation of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 prevalence in feces, hides, and carcasses of beef cattle during processing. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  G. Kapperud,et al.  Salmonella infections in Norway: descriptive epidemiology and a case-control study , 1998, Epidemiology and Infection.

[9]  I. Dohoo Application of Quantitative Methods in Veterinary Epidemiology , 1998 .

[10]  J. Noordhuizen,et al.  EPISCOPE: computer programs in veterinary epidemiology , 1990, Veterinary Record.

[11]  Wu Leung,et al.  Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. , 1962 .

[12]  PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF MICROBIOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT CAC/GL-30 (1999) , 2001 .

[13]  Michael Krennerich Ernährungs- und Landwirtschaftsorganisation der Vereinten Nationen (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations/FAO) , 1995 .

[14]  O. H. Siegmund The Merck veterinary manual : a handbook of diagnosis and therapy for the veterinarian , 1961 .