High performance computer methods applied to predictive space weather simulations

Taking advantage of the advent of massively parallel computers, sophisticated solution-adaptive techniques, and recent fundamental advances in basic numerical methods the authors have developed a high performance, adaptive-scale MHD code capable of resolving many of the critical processes in the Sun-Earth system which range over more than nine orders of magnitude. The development of such models are of increasing importance as the impact of space weather on vulnerable technological systems increases, and too, as the severity of space weather increases with the approach of solar maximum. There is an increasing need to develop physics-based, high performance models of the Sun-Earth system from the solar surface to the Earth's upper atmosphere which can operate faster than real time and which can provide reliable predictions of the near Earth space environment based upon solar observations and upstream solar wind measurements. They report on the status of the Michigan adaptive-scale MHD model, which is one effort whose goal is the development of an operational predictive space weather model.

[1]  P. Roe,et al.  A Solution-Adaptive Upwind Scheme for Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics , 1999 .

[2]  R. M. Winglee,et al.  Comparison of the high-latitude ionospheric electrodynamics inferred from global simulations and semiempirical models for the January 1992 GEM campaign , 1997 .

[3]  Q.F. Stout,et al.  Adaptive Blocks: A High Performance Data Structure , 1997, ACM/IEEE SC 1997 Conference (SC'97).

[4]  Hannu E. J. Koskinen,et al.  The closure of region‐1 field‐aligned current in MHD simulation , 1997 .

[5]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second-order scheme , 1974 .

[6]  James A. Slavin,et al.  Boundary layer formation in the magnetotail: Geotail observations and comparisons with a global MHD simulation , 1997 .

[7]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection , 1977 .

[8]  Quentin F. Stout,et al.  An adaptive MHD method for global space weather simulations , 2000 .

[9]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme III. Upstream-centered finite-difference schemes for ideal compressible flow , 1977 .

[10]  G. Siscoe,et al.  The Magnetospheric Sash and the Cross‐Tail S , 1998 .

[11]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme I. The quest of monotonicity , 1973 .

[12]  Pekka Janhunen,et al.  GUMICS-3 A Global Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Coupling Simulation with High Ionospheric Resolution , 1996 .

[13]  T. Linde,et al.  A three-dimensional adaptive multifluid MHD model of the heliosphere. , 1998 .

[14]  Kenneth G. Powell,et al.  AN APPROXIMATE RIEMANN SOLVER FOR MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS (That Works in More than One Dimension) , 1994 .

[15]  D. Baker,et al.  Pseudobreakup and substorm onset: Observations and MHD simulations compared , 1998 .

[16]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method , 1979 .

[17]  Quentin F. Stout,et al.  Adaptive Parallel Computation of a Grand-Challenge Problem: Prediction of the Path of a Solar-Corona Mass Ejection , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM SC98 Conference.

[18]  M. J. Rycroft Cross-scale coupling in space plasmas , 1997 .