Rapid Assessments of Amazon Forest Structure and Biomass Using Small Unmanned Aerial Systems

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can provide new ways to measure forests and supplement expensive or labor-intensive inventory methods. Forest carbon, a key uncertainty in the global carbon cycle and also important for carbon conservation programs, is typically monitored using manned aircraft or extensive forest plot networks to estimate aboveground carbon density (ACD). Manned aircraft are only cost-effective when applied to large areas (>100,000 ha), while plot networks are most effective for total C stock estimation across large areas, not for quantifying spatially-explicit variation. We sought to develop an effective method for frequent and accurate ACD estimation at intermediate scales (100–100,000 ha) that would be sensitive to small-scale disturbance. Using small UAVs, we collected imagery of 516 ha of lowland forest in the Peruvian Amazon. We then used a structure-from-motion (SFM) approach to create a 3D model of forest canopy. Comparing SFM- and airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)-derived estimates of canopy height and ACD, we found that SFM estimates of top-of-canopy height (TCH) and ACD were highly correlated with previous LiDAR estimates (r = 0.86–0.93 and r = 0.73–0.94 for TCH and ACD, respectively, at 0.1–4 ha grain sizes), with r = 0.92 for ACD determination at the 1 ha scale, despite SFM and LiDAR measurements being separated by two years in a dynamic forest. SFM and LiDAR estimates of mean TCH and mean ACD were highly similar, differing by only 0.4% and 0.04%, respectively, within mature forest. The technique allows inexpensive, near-real-time monitoring of ACD for ecological studies, payment for ecosystem services (PES) ventures, such as reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+), forestry enterprises, and governance.

[1]  Karen Anderson,et al.  Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology , 2013 .

[2]  G. Asner,et al.  Mapping tropical forest carbon: Calibrating plot estimates to a simple LiDAR metric , 2014 .

[3]  Nicolas Baghdadi,et al.  External Geophysics, Climate and Environment Assessment of C-band SRTM DEM in a dense equatorial forest zone , 2005 .

[4]  M. Pierrot-Deseilligny,et al.  A Photogrammetric Workflow for the Creation of a Forest Canopy Height Model from Small Unmanned Aerial System Imagery , 2013 .

[5]  F. Achard,et al.  Determination of Deforestation Rates of the World's Humid Tropical Forests , 2002, Science.

[6]  F. Achard,et al.  Applying the conservativeness principle to REDD to deal with the uncertainties of the estimates , 2008 .

[7]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Tropical forest carbon assessment: integrating satellite and airborne mapping approaches , 2009 .

[8]  Lijuan Liu,et al.  A survey of remote sensing-based aboveground biomass estimation methods in forest ecosystems , 2016, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[9]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[10]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Inventory of Small Forest Areas Using an Unmanned Aerial System , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[11]  D. Roberts,et al.  The steady-state mosaic of disturbance and succession across an old-growth Central Amazon forest landscape , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Arild Angelsen,et al.  Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD): an options assessment report , 2009 .

[13]  B. St-Onge,et al.  MEASURING FOREST CANOPY HEIGHT USING A COMBINATION OF LIDAR AND AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY DATA , 2001 .

[14]  C. Peres Synergistic Effects of Subsistence Hunting and Habitat Fragmentation on Amazonian Forest Vertebrates , 2001 .

[15]  G. Asner,et al.  A universal airborne LiDAR approach for tropical forest carbon mapping , 2011, Oecologia.

[16]  Marc Olano,et al.  Optimal Altitude, Overlap, and Weather Conditions for Computer Vision UAV Estimates of Forest Structure , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[17]  F. Achard,et al.  Determination of tropical deforestation rates and related carbon losses from 1990 to 2010 , 2014, Global change biology.

[18]  G. Asner,et al.  Elevated rates of gold mining in the Amazon revealed through high-resolution monitoring , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  L. Wallace,et al.  Assessment of Forest Structure Using Two UAV Techniques: A Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds , 2016 .

[20]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Modeling the World from Internet Photo Collections , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[21]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Landscape-scale forest disturbance regimes in southern Peruvian Amazonia. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[22]  Stephan Getzin,et al.  Assessing biodiversity in forests using very high‐resolution images and unmanned aerial vehicles , 2012 .

[23]  S. Wich,et al.  Dawn of Drone Ecology: Low-Cost Autonomous Aerial Vehicles for Conservation , 2012 .

[24]  R. Q. Thomas,et al.  Clustered disturbances lead to bias in large-scale estimates based on forest sample plots. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[25]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  High spatial resolution three-dimensional mapping of vegetation spectral dynamics using computer vision , 2013 .

[26]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Carnegie Airborne Observatory-2: Increasing science data dimensionality via high-fidelity multi-sensor fusion , 2012 .

[27]  G. Asner,et al.  Evaluating uncertainty in mapping forest carbon with airborne LiDAR , 2011 .

[28]  Jennifer J. Swenson,et al.  Gold Mining in the Peruvian Amazon: Global Prices, Deforestation, and Mercury Imports , 2011, PloS one.

[29]  David E. Knapp,et al.  Automated mapping of tropical deforestation and forest degradation: CLASlite , 2009 .

[30]  Francisco Román-Dañobeytia,et al.  Reforestation with four native tree species after abandoned gold mining in the Peruvian Amazon , 2015 .

[31]  Rachel Gaulton,et al.  Unmanned aerial vehicles for pre-harvest biomass estimation in willow ( Salix spp . ) coppice plantations . , 2015 .

[32]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Markedly divergent estimates of Amazon forest carbon density from ground plots and satellites , 2014, Global ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology.

[33]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Remote Sensing of Vegetation Structure Using Computer Vision , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[34]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Amazonian landscapes and the bias in field studies of forest structure and biomass , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  J. Chambers,et al.  Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests , 2005, Oecologia.

[36]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  CO 2 emissions from forest loss , 2009 .

[37]  G. Powell,et al.  High-resolution forest carbon stocks and emissions in the Amazon , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  L. P. Koh,et al.  Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? , 2008 .

[39]  Andrew M. Cunliffe,et al.  Ultra-fine grain landscape-scale quantification of dryland vegetation structure with drone-acquired structure-from-motion photogrammetry , 2016 .

[40]  E. Lindquist,et al.  Multiple remote sensing data sources for REDD+ monitoring , 2012 .

[41]  S. Goetz,et al.  Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps , 2012 .

[42]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Direct Georeferencing of Ultrahigh-Resolution UAV Imagery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[43]  L. Monika Moskal,et al.  Fusion of LiDAR and imagery for estimating forest canopy fuels , 2010 .

[44]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Species Loss and Aboveground Carbon Storage in a Tropical Forest , 2005, Science.

[45]  K. Moffett,et al.  Remote Sens , 2015 .