Distributed sensor swarms for monitoring bird behavior: an integrated system using wildlife acoustics recorders

Birds are frequently vocal. Monitoring their songs and calls has provided much useful information about their ecology and behavior. Recording bird songs and locations can be resource intensive, frequently requiring two or more observers, causing considerable disturbance and possible only for short times. Passive arrays of acoustic sensors offer the possibility of greatly increasing our ability to monitor bird activity. The desirability of such arrays is obvious: they are less intrusive, can monitor continuously over long periods, permit collaboration which enables better localization, provide fault tolerance, and facilitate sharing to optimize scarce resources. That the interest has been increasing so much lately is in large part, because we are now at the point, where the promise of such arrays is realizable with current or reasonably anticipated technologies. Controlling collaborative arrays can be difficult. Engineered solutions are sometimes available, but they are often brittle and appropriate only for ideal environments. We would like our systems to be: robust, in that they can handle changing environments or agents and are untroubled by occasionally wrong or noisy messages; adaptive in that they can learn to deal with unanticipated source or events, form new concepts, and communicate in languages that are specialized for particular agents; and finally, they should be self-configuring, to deal with changing situations and goals. After reviewing research employing sensor arrays by others to monitor bird behavior, we will describe research in our laboratory. Our focus will be on the construction of such systems, especially how such arrays can extract information from the environment and communicate to arrive at a collective understanding of their region and events occurring there.

[1]  Gregory J. Pottie,et al.  Wireless integrated network sensors , 2000, Commun. ACM.

[2]  Abeer Alwan,et al.  A robust automatic bird phrase classifier using dynamic time-warping with prominent region identification , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[3]  Kurt M Fristrup,et al.  Accuracy of an acoustic location system for monitoring the position of duetting songbirds in tropical forest. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Kung Yao,et al.  An Empirical Study of Collaborative Acoustic Source Localization , 2009, J. Signal Process. Syst..

[5]  Abeer Alwan,et al.  Dynamic time warping and sparse representation classification for birdsong phrase classification using limited training data. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Yuan Yao,et al.  Studies of vocal communications in cooperatively breeding acorn woodpeckers (Melanerpes formicivorus) , 2008 .

[7]  Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho,et al.  Acoustic sequences in non‐human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus , 2016, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[8]  Charles E. Taylor,et al.  Wireless sensor network-based acoustic localization for studying animal communication in terrestrial environments , 2010 .

[9]  K. Hobson,et al.  Acoustic surveys of birds using electronic recordings: new potential from an omnidirectional microphone system , 2002 .

[10]  Sarah L. Dumyahn,et al.  What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  IEEE China Summit and International Conference on Signal and Information Processing, ChinaSIP 2015, Chengdu, China, July 12-15, 2015 , 2015, ChinaSIP.

[12]  Gregory M. Kobele,et al.  Natural Language Interface to an Intrusion Detection System , 2001 .

[13]  Charles E. Taylor,et al.  Acoustic 3D localization of a tropical songbird , 2013, 2013 IEEE China Summit and International Conference on Signal and Information Processing.

[14]  David R. Wilson,et al.  Field test of an affordable, portable, wireless microphone array for spatial monitoring of animal ecology and behaviour , 2012 .

[15]  Andreas M. Ali,et al.  Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus , 2011 .

[16]  Lewis Girod,et al.  Is alarm calling risky? Marmots avoid calling from risky places. , 2010, Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[17]  Kung Yao,et al.  Maximum-likelihood source localization and unknown sensor location estimation for wideband signals in the near-field , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[18]  Kung Yao,et al.  Tracking of Acoustic Sources Using Random Set Theory , 2014, IEEE Systems Journal.

[19]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  CHANGES IN AMBIENT TEMPERATURE TRIGGER YAWNING BUT NOT STRETCHING IN RATS. , 2011, Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[20]  Peter Arzberger,et al.  New Eyes on the World: Advanced Sensors for Ecology , 2009 .

[21]  Abeer Alwan,et al.  Bird phrase segmentation by entropy-driven change point detection , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[22]  Charles E. Taylor,et al.  Territorial dynamics of Mexican Ant‐thrushes Formicarius moniliger revealed by individual recognition of their songs , 2011 .

[23]  Michael Towsey,et al.  A practical comparison of manual and autonomous methods for acoustic monitoring , 2013 .

[24]  Charles E. Taylor,et al.  Using Song to Identify Cassin's Vireo Individuals. A Comparative Study of Pattern Recognition Algorithms , 2014, MCPR.

[25]  Kung Yao,et al.  Acoustic DOA Estimation: An Approximate Maximum Likelihood Approach , 2014, IEEE Systems Journal.

[26]  Charles E Taylor,et al.  Acoustic localization of antbirds in a Mexican rainforest using a wireless sensor network. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  T. Scott Brandes,et al.  Automated sound recording and analysis techniques for bird surveys and conservation , 2008, Bird Conservation International.