Mechanical behaviour of synthetic surgical meshes: finite element simulation of the herniated abdominal wall.

The material properties of meshes used in hernia surgery contribute to the overall mechanical behaviour of the repaired abdominal wall. The mechanical response of a surgical mesh has to be defined since the haphazard orientation of an anisotropic mesh can lead to inconsistent surgical outcomes. This study was designed to characterize the mechanical behaviour of three surgical meshes (Surgipro®, Optilene® and Infinit®) and to describe a mechanical constitutive law that accurately reproduces the experimental results. Finally, through finite element simulation, the behaviour of the abdominal wall was modelled before and after surgical mesh implant. Uniaxial loading of mesh samples in two perpendicular directions revealed the isotropic response of Surgipro® and the anisotropic behaviour of Optilene® and Infinit®. A phenomenological constitutive law was used to reproduce the measured experimental curves. To analyze the mechanical effect of the meshes once implanted in the abdomen, finite element simulation of the healthy and partially herniated repaired rabbit abdominal wall served to reproduce wall behaviour before and after mesh implant. In all cases, maximal displacements were lower and maximal principal stresses higher in the implanted abdomen than the intact wall model. Despite the fact that no mesh showed a behaviour that perfectly matched that of abdominal muscle, the Infinit® mesh was able to best comply with the biomechanics of the abdominal wall.

[1]  K. Müller,et al.  Experimental Comparison of Monofile Light and Heavy Polypropylene Meshes: Less Weight Does Not Mean Less Biological Response , 2007, World Journal of Surgery.

[2]  M. Rosen,et al.  The single-staged approach to the surgical management of abdominal wall hernias in contaminated fields , 2007, Hernia.

[3]  A.J.M. Spencer,et al.  Theory of invariants , 1971 .

[4]  G. Pascual,et al.  Comparing the behavior of different polypropylene meshes (heavy and lightweight) in an experimental model of ventral hernia repair. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[5]  R. Ogden,et al.  A New Constitutive Framework for Arterial Wall Mechanics and a Comparative Study of Material Models , 2000 .

[6]  J. Weiss,et al.  Finite element implementation of incompressible, transversely isotropic hyperelasticity , 1996 .

[7]  I. Lichtenstein,et al.  Ambulatory outpatient hernia surgery. Including a new concept, introducing tension-free repair. , 1986, International surgery.

[8]  Andreas Prescher,et al.  Anisotropy of human linea alba: a biomechanical study. , 2005, The Journal of surgical research.

[9]  Uwe Klinge,et al.  The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair , 2005, Expert review of medical devices.

[10]  U Klinge,et al.  Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model. , 2002, The Journal of surgical research.

[11]  F. C. Usher,et al.  A new technique for the repair of inguinal and incisional hernias. , 1960, Archives of surgery.

[12]  G. Pascual,et al.  Early tissue incorporation and collagen deposition in lightweight polypropylene meshes: bioassay in an experimental model of ventral hernia. , 2008, Surgery.

[13]  B. Klosterhalfen,et al.  Functional and morphological evaluation of a low-weight, monofilament polypropylene mesh for hernia repair. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  J. Bellón.  Role of the new lightweight prostheses in improving hernia repair , 2009 .

[15]  B Calvo,et al.  Mechanical and histological characterization of the abdominal muscle. A previous step to modelling hernia surgery. , 2011, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[16]  A. Ibrahimbegovic.  Nonlinear Solid Mechanics , 2009 .

[17]  A. Schachtrupp,et al.  Individual inflammatory response of human blood monocytes to mesh biomaterials , 2003, The British journal of surgery.

[18]  U. Klinge,et al.  Biocompatibility of Biomaterials - Clinical and Mechanical Aspects , 1999 .

[19]  Y. Novitsky,et al.  Anisotropic evaluation of synthetic surgical meshes , 2011, Hernia.

[20]  T. Mascarenhas,et al.  Mechanical properties of polypropylene mesh used in pelvic floor repair , 2008, International Urogynecology Journal.

[21]  K. Junge,et al.  Elasticity of the anterior abdominal wall and impact for reparation of incisional hernias using mesh implants , 2001, Hernia.

[22]  I. Lichtenstein,et al.  The tension-free hernioplasty. , 1989, American journal of surgery.

[23]  B. Heniford,et al.  Textile analysis of heavy weight, mid-weight, and light weight polypropylene mesh in a porcine ventral hernia model. , 2004, The Journal of surgical research.

[24]  D. Marquardt.  An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[25]  J. M. Bellón.  Implicaciones de los nuevos diseños protésicos de baja densidad en la mejora de la reparación de defectos herniarios , 2009 .

[26]  B. Matthews,et al.  Normal intraabdominal pressure in healthy adults. , 2005, The Journal of surgical research.

[27]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  Using finite strain 3D‐material models in beam and shell elements , 2002 .

[28]  M. Doblaré,et al.  Computational Modelling of Diarthrodial Joints. Physiological, Pathological and Pos-Surgery Simulations , 2007 .

[29]  H. W. Weizsäcker,et al.  A stress-strain relation for a rat abdominal aorta. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  T. Frank,et al.  Mechanical properties of the human abdominal wall measured in vivo during insufflation for laparoscopic surgery , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.