Comparison of methods for immobilization to carboxymethyl dextran sensor surfaces by analysis of the specific activity of monoclonal antibodies
暂无分享,去创建一个
Bo Johnsson | A. Hansson | S. Loefas | B. Johnsson | G. Lindquist | Stefan Löfås | Gabrielle Lindquist | Åsa Edström | Rose‐Marie Müller Hillgren | Anna Hansson | Å. Edström | Rose‐Marie Müller Hillgren | S. Löfås
[1] G. Magnusson,et al. Lactose repressor-operator DNA interactions: kinetic analysis by a surface plasmon resonance biosensor. , 1993, Analytical biochemistry.
[2] D. Margulies,et al. Direct detection of major histocompatibility complex class I binding to antigenic peptides using surface plasmon resonance. Peptide immobilization and characterization of binding specificity. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[3] S. Loefas,et al. Dextran modified gold surfaces for surface plasmon resonance sensors: immunoreactivity of immobilized antibodies and antibody-surface interaction studies , 1993 .
[4] T. Gribnau,et al. Comparison of three activated agaroses for use in affinity chromatography : effects on coupling performance and ligand leakage , 1993 .
[5] R L Wimalasena,et al. Factors affecting the specific activity of immobilized antibodies and their biologically active fragments. , 1991, Journal of chromatography.
[6] R. Karlsson,et al. Real-time biospecific interaction analysis using surface plasmon resonance and a sensor chip technology. , 1991, BioTechniques.
[7] S. Loefas,et al. Immobilization of proteins to a carboxymethyldextran-modified gold surface for biospecific interaction analysis in surface plasmon resonance sensors. , 1991, Analytical biochemistry.
[8] W. Velander,et al. Comparison of the performance of immunosorbents prepared by site-directed or random coupling of monoclonal antibodies. , 1991, Journal of chromatography.
[9] B. Persson,et al. Quantitative determination of surface concentration of protein with surface plasmon resonance using radiolabeled proteins , 1991 .
[10] G. Guiochon,et al. Influence of the choice of the boundary conditions on the results of the dynamic chromatography model , 1991 .
[11] D. Christensen,et al. Comparison of site-specific coupling chemistry for antibody immobilization on different solid supports , 1991 .
[12] T. Sisson,et al. An improved method for immobilizing IgG antibodies on protein A-agarose. , 1990, Journal of immunological methods.
[13] Bo Johnsson,et al. A novel hydrogel matrix on gold surfaces in surface plasmon resonance sensors for fast and efficient covalent immobilization of ligands , 1990 .
[14] M. Little,et al. Strategy for the immobilization of monoclonal antibodies on solid-phase supports. , 1988, Journal of chromatography.
[15] R. R. Walters,et al. Protein immobilization on silica supports. A ligand density study. , 1988, Journal of chromatography.
[16] D. O'Shannessy,et al. Site-specific immobilization of antibodies by their oligosaccharide moieties to new hydrazide derivatized solid supports. , 1988, Journal of immunological methods.
[17] Meir Wilchek,et al. High-performance affinity chromatography , 1988 .
[18] S. Schuster,et al. Immunoaffinity chromatography utilizing monoclonal antibodies. Factors which influence antigen-binding capacity. , 1987, Journal of immunological methods.
[19] M. J. Eddowes,et al. Direct immunochemical sensing: basic chemical principles and fundamental limitations. , 1987, Biosensors.
[20] J. Goding,et al. Monoclonal Antibodies: Principles and Practice , 1996 .
[21] J Carlsson,et al. Protein thiolation and reversible protein-protein conjugation. N-Succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate, a new heterobifunctional reagent. , 1978, The Biochemical journal.
[22] C. Anfinsen,et al. [31] Affinity chromatography , 1971 .