Tempo Rubato : Animacy Speeds Up Time in the Brain

Background How do we estimate time when watching an action? The idea that events are timed by a centralized clock has recently been called into question in favour of distributed, specialized mechanisms. Here we provide evidence for a critical specialization: animate and inanimate events are separately timed by humans. Methodology/Principal Findings In different experiments, observers were asked to intercept a moving target or to discriminate the duration of a stationary flash while viewing different scenes. Time estimates were systematically shorter in the sessions involving human characters moving in the scene than in those involving inanimate moving characters. Remarkably, the animate/inanimate context also affected randomly intermingled trials which always depicted the same still character. Conclusions/Significance The existence of distinct time bases for animate and inanimate events might be related to the partial segregation of the neural networks processing these two categories of objects, and could enhance our ability to predict critically timed actions.

[1]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[2]  A. Mizuno,et al.  A change of the leading player in flow Visualization technique , 2006, J. Vis..

[3]  R. Passingham,et al.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  K. Fujii,et al.  Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..

[5]  Peter Neri,et al.  Wholes and subparts in visual processing of human agency , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  A. Nobre,et al.  The hazards of time , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  M Concetta Morrone,et al.  Saccadic eye movements cause compression of time as well as space , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[9]  Catalin V. Buhusi,et al.  What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[12]  D. Eagleman Human time perception and its illusions , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Representation of Time by Neurons in the Posterior Parietal Cortex of the Macaque , 2003, Neuron.

[14]  R. Shepard Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.

[15]  Akihiro Yagi,et al.  Reduction of stimulus visibility compresses apparent time intervals , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Hodgins,et al.  Anthropomorphism influences perception of computer-animated characters' actions. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[17]  Maria Concetta Morrone,et al.  Shifts in spatial attention affect the perceived duration of events. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[18]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Perception of animacy and direction from local biological motion signals. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[19]  P. Tse,et al.  Time and the Brain: How Subjective Time Relates to Neural Time , 2005 .

[20]  P. Viviani,et al.  The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[21]  D. Eagleman,et al.  The Effect of Predictability on Subjective Duration , 2007, PloS one.

[22]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neural responses during interception of real and apparent circularly moving stimuli in motor cortex and area 7a. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  A. Georgopoulos Cognitive motor control: spatial and temporal aspects , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[24]  D. Lyon,et al.  Time course of visual extrapolation accuracy. , 1995, Acta psychologica.

[25]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[26]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[27]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion , 2001, Vision Research.

[28]  M. Jeannerod The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[29]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  P. Tse,et al.  Attention and the subjective expansion of time , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  Natalie Sebanz,et al.  Prediction in Joint Action: What, When, and Where , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[33]  Peter Neri,et al.  Meaningful interactions can enhance visual discrimination of human agents , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  Ikuya Murakami,et al.  Perceived duration of visual motion increases with speed. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Activation in Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Parallels Parameter Inducing the Percept of Animacy , 2005, Neuron.

[36]  B Reiser,et al.  Confidence intervals for the 50 per cent response dose , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[37]  W. Prinz,et al.  Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[38]  P. Haggard,et al.  Voluntary action and conscious awareness , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Time dilation in dynamic visual display. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[40]  D. Buonomano,et al.  The neural basis of temporal processing. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[41]  Scott A. W. Brown Time and attention: Review of the literature , 2008 .

[42]  R. Blake,et al.  What constitutes an efficient reference frame for vision? , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  R. Shepard Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.

[44]  John E. Opfer,et al.  Development of the Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 2010 .

[45]  G. Orban,et al.  Human Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals Separation and Integration of Shape and Motion Cues in Biological Motion Processing , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  D. Perrett,et al.  A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus responds to observed intentional actions , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  M Concetta Morrone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for timing visual events are spatially selective in real-world coordinates , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  K. Doya,et al.  A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[49]  P. Viviani,et al.  Perceptual asynchronies for biological and non-biological visual events , 2004, Vision Research.

[50]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  P. Haggard,et al.  Experts see it all: configural effects in action observation , 2010, Psychological research.

[52]  R. Miall,et al.  Distinct systems for automatic and cognitively controlled time measurement: evidence from neuroimaging , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[53]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Spatially Localized Distortions of Event Time , 2006, Current Biology.

[54]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  Rolling Perception without Rolling Motion , 2008, Perception.

[55]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[56]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  Behavioral speed contagion: Automatic modulation of movement timing by observation of body movements , 2008, Cognition.