Diagrammatic Cognition: Discovery and Design William Bechtel (bechtel@ucsd.edu) Department of Philosophy and Interdisciplinary Program in Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0119 USA Keywords: diagrams, visuospatial representations; external representations; problem solving; diagrammatic reasoning; scientific reasoning; cognitive tools; design the workshop will have presentations from many disciplines: psychology, philosophy, computer science, education, design, and more. There will be two kinds of presentations: i) overview papers (30 minutes) by established researchers and ii) blitz talks (5 minutes) presenting specific current research projects. Blitz presentations have been highly successful in previous workshops, and are standard and excellent at large computer science meetings. The blitz presentations will allow broad participation from the cognitive science community and stimulate discussion around specific findings. Introduction External representations of thought—maps, diagrams, sketches, and the like—are ancient inventions that serve thought and communication in numerous ways. A number of cognitive scientists have investigated roles these representations play in cognition (see, e.g., Donald, 1991; Larkin & Simon, 1987; Norman, 1993; Schon, 1983). They are created and used by school students, by architects and designers, by mathematicians and scientists, by musicians, dancers, and artists. People design and use diagrams to spatialize thought and make it public, to work through ideas and clarify thinking, to reduce working memory load, to communicate ideas to others, to promote collaborative work by providing an external representation that can be pointed to and animated by gestures and collectively revised. Considerable research has shown that well-designed diagrams promote thought, creativity, discovery, and communication. Diagrams can map abstract thought to space, allowing spatial reasoning to promote abstract reasoning. Just as many diverse groups create and use diagrams, many diverse groups are actively studying their creation and use. Educators study ways to design effective diagrams and ways to educate students to use them. Psychologists study how diagrams are perceived, comprehended, and created. Both educators and psychologists study ways to promote the spatial thinking skills underlying comprehension and creation of diagrams. Designers study their use in design, artists their use in art. Historians and philosophers of science describe case studies of the insightful development of diagrams by scientists and the insights those diagrams have provided to others. Philosophers analyze formal properties of diagrams. Mathematicians explore the diagrammatic thinking that underlies mathematical thought and discovery. Computer scientists study ways computers can understand and process diagrams. Other computer scientists develop displays that will effectively analyze and convey Big Data. Journalism schools now teach data visualization and diagram narratives, as these are increasingly important in journalism. The proliferation of digital tools have proliferated the use of diagrams. Morning Session: Creating and Coordinating Diagrams Barbara Tversky, “Creating Diagrams” Professor Emerita of Psychology at Stanford University and a Professor of Psychology and Education at Teachers College, Columbia University, USA Patrick Healey, “Coordinating Graphical Languages” Professor for Human Interaction, School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, UK David Kirsh, “Thinking with Illustrations” Professor of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, USA Blitz Talks: Peter Coppin, University of Toronto; James Corter, Teachers College, Columbia University; Valeria Giardino, Free University Berlin; Azadeh Jamalian, Teachers College, Columbia University; Maithilee Kunda, Georgia Institute of Technology; David Peebles, University of Huddensfield; Anne Schuler, Knowledge Media Research Center; and others Afternoon Session: Diagrams in Science William Bechtel, “Ways Scientists Reason with Diagrams” Professor of Philosophy, University of California, San Diego, USA Peter Cheng, “Re-discovering diagrams and re-codifying knowledge in science” Professor of Cognitive Science, Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, UK Goals and Plan of the Workshop Mary Hegarty, “Cognition and Metacognition in Reasoning with Diagrams” Professor of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA The goal of the workshop is dual: a) to bring together a diverse set of researchers working on various aspects of diagrammatic reasoning; b) to bring the issues and research to a broader audience in Cognitive Science. To these ends,
[1]
Donald A. Sch.
The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action
,
1983
.
[2]
William Bechtel,et al.
Why Do Biologists Use So Many Diagrams?
,
2013,
Philosophy of Science.
[3]
Herbert A. Simon,et al.
Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words
,
1987,
Cogn. Sci..
[4]
David Kirsh,et al.
Thinking with external representations
,
2010,
AI & SOCIETY.
[5]
D. Schoen,et al.
The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
,
1985
.
[6]
Barbara Tversky,et al.
Prolegomenon to Scientific Visualizations
,
2005
.
[7]
John K. Gilbert,et al.
Visualization in science education
,
2005
.
[8]
A. Jonker.
Origins of the modern mind. Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition
,
1998
.
[9]
William Bechtel,et al.
Diagramming Phenomena for Mechanistic Explanation
,
2012,
CogSci.
[10]
Barbara Tversky,et al.
Visualizing Thought
,
2011,
Top. Cogn. Sci..
[11]
Peter C.-H. Cheng,et al.
Probably Good Diagrams for Learning: Representational Epistemic Recodification of Probability Theory
,
2011,
Top. Cogn. Sci..
[12]
M. Hegarty.
Components of Spatial Intelligence
,
2010
.
[13]
Peter C.-H. Cheng,et al.
Electrifying diagrams for learning: principles for complex representational systems
,
2002,
Cogn. Sci..
[14]
Donald A. Norman,et al.
Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In The Age Of The Machine
,
1993
.
[15]
Ichiro Umata,et al.
Graphical Language Games: Interactional Constraints on Representational Form
,
2007,
Cogn. Sci..
[16]
Mary Hegarty,et al.
The Cognitive Science of Visual-Spatial Displays: Implications for Design
,
2011,
Top. Cogn. Sci..