Accessible tourism online resources: a Northern European perspective

ABSTRACT Increasing market opportunities have been identified for accessible tourism as a result of improved quality of life. Disabled tourists tend to be loyal, spend more and enjoy longer stays in their destinations, although their behaviour obviously differs from one country to another. This situation is strongly influenced by the welfare policies that determine the disability model implemented and affect the extent to which disabled people are integrated into day-to-day. Northern European countries are regarded as champions in this respect. When disabled people travel, access to information is important. Information is present throughout the tourism process, not only as a communication and marketing channel, but also as a transmitter of experiences. This study seeks to establish whether the policies and regulations that govern disabled people’s access to online tourist information are applied correctly. The official tourism websites of northern European countries were analysed to this end; whereby different patterns were identified regarding their compliance with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. The atypical features of Norway’s official tourism website were found to be particularly noteworthy, as were the official tourism websites for Germany and the United Kingdom, two of the countries with the largest market share of accessible tourism.

[1]  Dimitrios Buhalis,et al.  Social media as a destination marketing tool: its use by national tourism organisations , 2013 .

[2]  T. Huan,et al.  Performance evaluation of tourism websites' information quality of four global destination brands: Beijing, Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Taipei , 2014 .

[3]  Ana María Munar,et al.  Tourist-created Content: Rethinking Destination Branding , 2011 .

[4]  Luis Moreno La Europa Asocial. Crisis y Estado del Bienestar , 2014 .

[5]  J. J. Burnett,et al.  Assessing the Travel-Related Behaviors of the Mobility-Disabled Consumer , 2001 .

[6]  Yakup Akgül,et al.  Web Accessibility Evaluation of Government Websites for People with Disabilities in Turkey , 2016 .

[7]  Y. T. Yang,et al.  Web Accessibility for Older Adults: A Comparative Analysis of Disability Laws. , 2015, The Gerontologist.

[8]  S. Darcy Tourism patterns and experiences of New South Wales people with a physical disability , 1997 .

[9]  Maeve Paris,et al.  Website accessibility: a survey of local e-government websites and legislation in Northern Ireland , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[10]  M. Styvén,et al.  Benefits and barriers for the use of digital channels among small tourism companies , 2019 .

[11]  A. Muuri,et al.  Social Protection in the Nordic Countries 1999 , 2000 .

[12]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Digital Quality of Life: Understanding the Personal and Social Benefits of the Information Technology Revolution , 2008 .

[13]  D. Mitrany Methodology of the Social Sciences , 1945, Nature.

[14]  Jo Mackiewicz,et al.  A usability analysis of municipal government website home pages in Alabama , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  K. Kolářová Disability in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union: history, policy and everyday life , 2015 .

[16]  Mohamad Noorman Masrek,et al.  Accessibility Evaluation on Malaysian E-Government Websites , 2010 .

[17]  Joanne Kuzma,et al.  Analysis of U.S. Senate Web Sites For Disability Accessibility , 2009 .

[18]  Ina Freeman,et al.  French versus Canadian Tourism: Response to the Disabled , 2010 .

[19]  Ana María Munar,et al.  Trust and Involvement in Tourism Social Media and Web-Based Travel Information Sources , 2013 .

[20]  C. Mete Economic implications of chronic illness and disability in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union , 2008 .

[21]  M. B. A. Mourad,et al.  Accessibility Evaluation of Dubai e-Government Websites: Findings and Implications , 2013 .

[22]  Trinidad Domínguez Vila,et al.  Economic profitability of accessible tourism for the tourism sector in Spain , 2013 .

[23]  Claire Paddison,et al.  A proposed architecture for integrating accessibility test tools , 2005, IBM Syst. J..

[24]  J. Gelissen,et al.  Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report , 2002 .

[25]  長瀬 修 わかりやすい障害者の権利条約 : 知的障害のある人の権利のために = Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities , 2009 .

[26]  U. Gretzel,et al.  Role of social media in online travel information search , 2010 .

[27]  Stefano Federici,et al.  Checking an integrated model of web accessibility and usability evaluation for disabled people , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[28]  Julia Macke,et al.  European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights , 2006 .

[29]  Youcheng Wang,et al.  Conceptualizing and evaluating the functions of destination marketing systems , 2007 .

[30]  Robert de Hoog,et al.  Travel websites: Changing visits, evaluations and posts , 2016 .

[31]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 , 2008 .

[32]  Gösta Knud Jorgen Esping Andersen Los tres mundos del estado del bienestar , 1993 .

[33]  U. Gretzel,et al.  Designing persuasive destination websites: A mental imagery processing perspective , 2012 .

[34]  Amjad Mehmood,et al.  Web Accessibility for Disabled: A Case Study of Government Websites in Pakistan , 2012, 2012 10th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology.

[35]  Youcheng Wang,et al.  Measuring the effectiveness of US official state tourism websites , 2011 .

[36]  Eleni Michopoulou,et al.  Enabling access to tourism through information schemes , 2008 .

[37]  Simon Darcy,et al.  Website accessibility in the tourism industry: an analysis of official national tourism organization websites around the world , 2018, Disability and rehabilitation.

[38]  Organización Mundial de la Salud Global Health and Aging , 2011 .

[39]  Cristina Espadinha,et al.  Accessibility of Portuguese Public Universities' sites , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation.

[40]  Lorenzo Cantoni,et al.  Online communication in Spanish destination marketing organizations , 2017 .

[41]  M. Knežević,et al.  Attitude change towards guests with disabilities: Reflections From Tourism Students , 2011 .

[42]  Gauthier de Beco,et al.  UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , 2013 .

[43]  R. Pagán,et al.  The contribution of holiday trips to life satisfaction: the case of people with disabilities , 2015 .

[44]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  CARESOME: A system to enrich marketing customers acquisition and retention campaigns using social media information , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[45]  R. Prins,et al.  Who returns to work and why? : a six-country study on work incapacity and reintegration , 2001 .

[46]  M. Priestley,et al.  Labour Market Integration and Equality for Disabled People: A Comparative Analysis of Nordic and Baltic Countries , 2017 .

[47]  B. Pan,et al.  A retrospective view of electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management , 2017 .

[48]  Dimitrios Buhalis,et al.  Information-enabled tourism destination marketing: addressing the accessibility market , 2011 .

[49]  Liang Tang,et al.  Investigating the Routes of Communication on Destination Websites , 2012 .

[50]  L. Dwyer,et al.  Economic contribution of tourists with disabilities: an Australian approach and methodology. , 2010 .

[51]  Mustafa Al-Radaideh,et al.  Evaluating Accessibility of Jordanian E-Government Websites for People with Disabilities , 2011 .

[52]  Ana María Munar,et al.  Tourist information search and destination choice in a digital age , 2012 .

[53]  Eleni Michopoulou,et al.  Accessibility Market and Stakeholder Analysis , 2005 .

[54]  S. Lewthwaite Web accessibility standards and disability: developing critical perspectives on accessibility , 2014, Disability and rehabilitation.

[55]  Erik Samoy,et al.  Transforming Disability into Ability. Policies to Promote Work and Income Security for Disabled People , 2002, Journal of Income Distribution®.

[56]  Yuquan Shi,et al.  E-Government Web Site Accessibility in Australia and China , 2006 .

[57]  Vicente Pina,et al.  Accrual Accounting in EU Local Governments: One Method, Several Approaches , 2009 .

[58]  Friedrich Leisch,et al.  Evaluation of structure and reproducibility of cluster solutions using the bootstrap , 2010 .

[59]  Simon Darcy,et al.  A Whole-of-Life Approach to Tourism: The Case for Accessible Tourism Experiences , 2009 .

[60]  G. Bonoli Classifying Welfare States: a Two-dimension Approach , 1997, Journal of Social Policy.

[61]  Simon Darcy,et al.  Inherent complexity: Disability, accessible tourism and accommodation information preferences , 2010 .

[62]  A. Lemmetyinen The Role of the DMO in Creating Value in EU‐funded Tourism Projects , 2010 .