User resistance and strategies for promoting acceptance across system types

Understanding the factors that contribute to the success of systems implementation efforts is a central concern in the field of information systems (IS). One key factor to which many implementation problems have been attributed is user resistance to change. Different types of systems tend to be associated with different organizational functions and classes of users, and thus may be resisted for different reasons. This paper reports the results of a study investigating the link between resistance reasons and system types and assessing managerial perceptions of the relative importance of various strategies for promoting acceptance in the context of those types. Surveying 66 managers in a variety of organizations, our results suggest that decision support systems (DSS) and transaction processing systems (TPS) are resisted for different reasons, and that promotion strategy effectiveness also differs. Additionally, our study attempts to make explicit, based on system type, key reasons for user resistance and the remedies designed to promote acceptance. This improves our overall understanding of the resistance phenomenon and guides analysts in selecting an appropriate strategy for a given system type.

[1]  Katherine J. Klein,et al.  Chapter 1. Training and the Organizational Consequences of Technological Change: A Case Study of Computer-Aided Design and Drafting , 1990 .

[2]  Gary Klein,et al.  User perceptions of evaluation criteria for three system types , 1996, DATB.

[3]  Rob Kling,et al.  Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research , 1980, CSUR.

[4]  Robert L. Glass,et al.  Contemporary Application-Domain Taxonomies , 1995, IEEE Softw..

[5]  Enid Mumford,et al.  The ETHICS approach , 1993, CACM.

[6]  Kailash Joshi,et al.  A causal path model of the overall user attitudes toward the MIS function: The case of user information satisfaction , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[7]  D. G. Gardner,et al.  Computer use, self-confidence, and attitudes: A causal analysis , 1993 .

[8]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Quality circles: After the honeymoon , 1987 .

[9]  Maris G. Martinsons,et al.  The Influence of Human Factors and Specialist Involvement on Information Systems Success , 1999 .

[10]  Stewart L. Stokes.  Coping With Change At The Top , 1996, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[11]  F. Land.  The Management of Change: Guidelines for the Successful Implementation of Information Systems , 2018, Computer-Supported Cooperative Work.

[12]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Successful Implementation of End-User Computing , 1987 .

[13]  Thomas L. Legare.  MINIMIZING RESISTANCE TO TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE A Power and Politics Approach , 1995 .

[14]  Daniel Robey,et al.  An investigation of user-led system design: rational and political perspectives , 1984, CACM.

[15]  Carson C. Woo,et al.  Information systems development and communicative action theory , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[16]  T. H. Holmes,et al.  Short-term intrusions into the life style routine. , 1970, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[17]  P. Hersey,et al.  Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources , 1971 .

[18]  J. Kotter,et al.  Choosing strategies for change. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[19]  Evan E. Anderson,et al.  Managerial considerations in participative design of MIS/DSS , 1985, Inf. Manag..

[20]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Kailash Joshi,et al.  A Model of Users' Perspective on Change: The Case of Information Systems Technology Implementation , 1991, MIS Q..

[22]  H H Schmitz,et al.  Information resource management , 1989, The Health care supervisor.

[23]  A. Boonstra.  Information systems and organizational change , 2002 .

[24]  Clare-Marie Karat.  Guaranteeing rights for the user , 1998, CACM.

[25]  Leonard Adelman,et al.  Evaluating decision support and expert systems , 1991 .

[26]  G. Lawrence Sanders,et al.  An Experimental Validation of the Gorry and Scott Morton Framework , 1989, MIS Q..

[27]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[28]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Measuring Managers' Minds: The Assessment Of Style in Human Information Processing , 1981 .

[29]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[30]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Managing the change to an automated office: lessons from five case studies , 1988 .

[31]  W. Nord,et al.  Implementing Routine and Radical Inno-vation , 1986 .

[32]  James D. McKeen,et al.  Computerization and management: A study of conflict and change , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[33]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[34]  K. Kendall.  The Significance of Information Systems Research on Emerging Technologies: Seven Information Technologies that Promise to Improve Managerial Effectiveness* , 1997 .

[35]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[36]  John R. Mergendoller,et al.  Attitudes Toward Computers and Computer Use , 1993 .