Temporal evolution from retinal image size to perceived size in human visual cortex

Our visual system affords a distance-invariant percept of object size by integrating retinal image size with viewing distance (size constancy). Single-unit studies with animals have shown that real changes in distance can modulate the firing rate of neurons in primary visual cortex and even subcortical structures, which raises an intriguing possibility that the required integration for size constancy may occur in the initial visual processing in V1 or even earlier. In humans, however, EEG and brain imaging studies have typically manipulated the apparent (not real) distance of stimuli using pictorial illusions, in which the cues to distance are sparse and not congruent. Here, we physically moved the monitor to different distances from the observer, a more ecologically valid paradigm that emulates what happens in everyday life. Using this paradigm in combination with electroencephalography (EEG), we were able for the first time to examine how the computation of size constancy unfolds in real time under real-world viewing conditions. We showed that even when all distance cues were available and congruent, size constancy took about 150 ms to emerge in the activity of visual cortex. The 150-ms interval exceeds the time required for the visual signals to reach V1, but is consistent with the time typically associated with later processing within V1 or recurrent processing from higher-level visual areas. Therefore, this finding provides unequivocal evidence that size constancy does not occur during the initial signal processing in V1 or earlier, but requires subsequent processing, just like any other feature binding mechanisms.

[1]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Grasping the non-conscious: Preserved grip scaling to unseen objects for immediate but not delayed grasping following a unilateral lesion to primary visual cortex , 2011, Vision Research.

[2]  Jennifer L. Campos,et al.  Neural correlates of size illusions: an event-related potential study , 2009, Neuroreport.

[3]  D. Kersten,et al.  The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Brain circuits for the internal monitoring of movements. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  W. Richards Size-Distance Transformations , 1971 .

[6]  Renaud Lancelot,et al.  Tick-Bacteria Mutualism Depends on B Vitamin Synthesis Pathways , 2018, Current Biology.

[7]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Vergence eye movements in response to binocular disparity without depth perception , 1997, Nature.

[8]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[9]  M. Goodale,et al.  The effects of shape crowding on grasping. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[10]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The Site of Size Constancy , 1972, Perception.

[11]  B. Gilmartin,et al.  The effect of pupil size on static and dynamic measurements of accommodation using an infra‐red optometer , 1989, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[12]  M. Goodale,et al.  Proprioceptive Distance Cues Restore Perfect Size Constancy in Grasping, but Not Perception, When Vision Is Limited , 2018, Current Biology.

[13]  R Lal,et al.  Effect of passive eye position changes on retinogeniculate transmission in the cat. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Alfred H. Holway,et al.  Determinants of Apparent Visual Size with Distance Variant , 1941 .

[15]  Takeo Iida,et al.  The effect of pupil size on accommodation , 1976, Vision Research.

[16]  Scott O. Murray,et al.  Object-Centered Shifts of Receptive Field Positions in Monkey Primary Visual Cortex , 2014, Current Biology.

[17]  A. Milner,et al.  Perception and Action in Depth , 1998, Consciousness and Cognition.

[18]  C. Batini,et al.  Extraocular muscle afferents and visual input interactions in the superior colliculus of the cat. , 1979, Progress in brain research.

[19]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[20]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Size constancy in rhesus monkeys: Effects of pulvinar, prestriate, and inferotemporal lesions , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  M. Goodale,et al.  Differences in the Effects of Crowding on Size Perception and Grip Scaling in Densely Cluttered 3-D Scenes , 2015, Psychological science.

[22]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Spontaneous in-flight accommodation of hand orientation to unseen grasp targets: A case of action blindsight , 2018, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[23]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  M. Wyke ALTERATIONS OF SIZE CONSTANCY ASSOCIATED WITH BRAIN LESIONS IN MAN* , 1960, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[25]  Lin Li The effect of binocular summation on time domain transient VEP wave's components , 2014 .

[26]  D. Kersten,et al.  Attention-Dependent Representation of a Size Illusion in Human V1 , 2008, Current Biology.

[27]  A. Dobbins,et al.  Distance modulation of neural activity in the visual cortex. , 1998, Science.

[28]  John M. Allman,et al.  The Effect of Gaze Angle and Fixation Distance on the Responses of Neurons in V1, V2, and V4 , 2002, Neuron.

[29]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[30]  A. Milner,et al.  Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Retinotopic activity in V1 reflects the perceived and not the retinal size of an afterimage , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Rainer Klinke,et al.  Zeichenerkennung durch biologische und technische Systeme / Pattern Recognition in Biological and Technical Systems , 1971 .

[33]  Whitman Richards Spatial remapping in the primate visual system , 2004, Kybernetik.

[34]  S. Celebrini,et al.  Gaze direction controls response gain in primary visual-cortex neurons , 1999, Nature.

[35]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[36]  S Thorpe,et al.  Modulation of neural stereoscopic processing in primate area V1 by the viewing distance. , 1992, Science.

[37]  D. Samuel Schwarzkopf,et al.  The surface area of human V1 predicts the subjective experience of object size , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Morrone,et al.  Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Activation of the Primary Visual Cortex Predicts Size Adaptation Illusion , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Relationship between visual binding, reentry and awareness , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[40]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Responses of Neurons in Primary Visual Cortex to Transient Changes in Local Contrast and Luminance , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Fang Fang,et al.  Position shifts of fMRI-based population receptive fields in human visual cortex induced by Ponzo illusion , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  Yingchen He,et al.  Attention-Dependent Early Cortical Suppression Contributes to Crowding , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses , 1994 .

[44]  Philippe A. Chouinard,et al.  The Mechanisms of Size Constancy. , 2015, Multisensory research.

[45]  Seth E. Bouvier,et al.  Visual Feature Binding Requires Reentry , 2010, Psychological science.

[46]  L Weiskrantz,et al.  Size Constancy in Monkeys with Inferotemporal Lesions , 1969, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[47]  Assessing the validity and reliability of spikes questionnaires regard in of medical residents awareness breaking bad news in TUMS 2012 , 2014 .

[48]  Juan Chen,et al.  Spatial summation revealed in the earliest visual evoked component C1 and the effect of attention on its linearity. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  David J. Jilk,et al.  Early recurrent feedback facilitates visual object recognition under challenging conditions , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[50]  Ankoor S. Shah,et al.  Functional anatomy and interaction of fast and slow visual pathways in macaque monkeys. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  E. Marg,et al.  Evidence for a neurological zoom system in vision from angular changes in some receptive fields of single neurons with changes in fixation distance in the human visual cortex , 1970, Experientia.

[52]  J. A. Pruszynski,et al.  Neural correlates , 2023 .

[53]  E. Marg,et al.  Zoom neurons in visual cortex: Receptive field enlargements with near fixation in monkeys , 1975, Experientia.

[54]  J. Malpeli,et al.  Responses of neurons in primary visual cortex are modulated by eye position. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  Lin Yang,et al.  Perceptual Learning Increases the Strength of the Earliest Signals in Visual Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.