Image quality in lossy compressed digital mammograms

Abstract The substitution of digital representations for analog images provides access to methods for digital storage and transmission and enables the use of a variety of digital image processing techniques, including enhancement and computer assisted screening and diagnosis. Lossy compression can further improve the efficiency of transmission and storage and can facilitate subsequent image processing. Both digitization (or digital acquisition) and lossy compression alter an image from its traditional form, and hence it becomes important that any such alteration be shown to improve or at least not damage the utility of the image in a screening or diagnostic application. One approach to demonstrating in a quantifiable manner that a specific image mode is at least equal to another is by clinical experiment simulating ordinary practice and suitable statistical analysis. In this paper we describe a general protocol for performing such a verification and present preliminary results of a specific experiment designed to show that 12 bpp digital mammograms compressed in a lossy fashion to 0.015 bpp using an embedded wavelet coding scheme result in no significant differences from the analog or digital originals.

[1]  Jelena Kovacevic,et al.  Wavelets and Subband Coding , 2013, Prentice Hall Signal Processing Series.

[2]  A. Abramson,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications. , 1989, Radiology.

[3]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  J. Hanley,et al.  Statistical Approaches to the Analysis of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves , 1984, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  C. Metz,et al.  Visual detection and localization of radiographic images. , 1975, Radiology.

[6]  De Luca Jt,et al.  Mammography in clinical practice. , 1966 .

[7]  J. Swets ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. , 1979, Investigative radiology.

[8]  Pamela C. Cosman,et al.  Evaluating quality of compressed medical images: SNR, subjective rating, and diagnostic accuracy , 1994, Proc. IEEE.

[9]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  Lossy image compression for digital medical imaging systems , 1990, Medical Imaging.

[10]  J. Connolly,et al.  Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1989, Radiology.

[11]  R.M. Gray,et al.  Evaluating quality and utility in digital mammography , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[12]  G.G. Langdon,et al.  Data compression , 1988, IEEE Potentials.

[13]  Adrian S. Lewis,et al.  Image compression using the 2-D wavelet transform , 1992, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[15]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Arithmetic coding for data compression , 1987, CACM.

[16]  Benjamin Belzer,et al.  Wavelet filter evaluation for image compression , 1995, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[17]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Digital mammography, cancer screening: Factors important for image compression , 1993 .

[18]  Paul G. Hoel,et al.  Introduction to Probability Theory , 1972 .

[19]  P. Holland,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis. , 1976 .

[20]  Bernd Girod,et al.  Vector quantization for entropy coding of image subbands , 1992, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[21]  Michel Barlaud,et al.  Image coding using wavelet transform , 1992, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[22]  Walter Richardson Nonlinear filtering and multiscale texture discrimination for mammograms , 1992, Optics & Photonics.

[23]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Linear discriminants and image quality , 1991, Image Vis. Comput..

[24]  H. K. Huang,et al.  Full-frame transform compression of CT and MR images. , 1989, Radiology.

[25]  R A Olshen,et al.  Thoracic CT images: effect of lossy image compression on diagnostic accuracy. , 1994, Radiology.

[26]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  Visually optimal DCT quantization matrices for individual images , 1993, [Proceedings] DCC `93: Data Compression Conference.

[27]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[28]  W H Anderson,et al.  Image data compression in magnification hand radiographs. , 1989, Radiology.

[29]  James A. Storer,et al.  Data Compression , 1992, Inf. Process. Manag..

[30]  William A. Pearlman,et al.  A new, fast, and efficient image codec based on set partitioning in hierarchical trees , 1996, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[31]  Pamela C. Cosman,et al.  Tree-structured vector quantization of CT chest scans: image quality and diagnostic accuracy , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[32]  P. W. Jones,et al.  Digital Image Compression Techniques , 1991 .

[33]  G. W. Snedecor Statistical Methods , 1964 .

[34]  M. Moskowitz,et al.  Breast cancer missed by mammography. , 1979, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  Jerome M. Shapiro,et al.  Embedded image coding using zerotrees of wavelet coefficients , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[36]  Pamela C. Cosman,et al.  Measurement accuracy as a measure of image quality in compressed MR chest scans , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[37]  S Sakuma,et al.  Clinical evaluation of irreversible image compression: analysis of chest imaging with computed radiography. , 1990, Radiology.

[38]  M L Giger,et al.  Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. , 1991, Radiology.

[39]  D. Ikeda,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances. , 1989, Radiology.

[40]  Pamela C. Cosman,et al.  Evaluating Quality and Utility of Digital Mammograms and Lossy Compressed Digital Mammograms , 1996 .

[41]  Heping Zhang,et al.  Predicting high-risk cholesterol levels , 1994 .

[42]  J T De Luca,et al.  Mammography in clinical practice. , 1966, New York state journal of medicine.

[43]  R.M. Gray,et al.  Measuring quality in computer-processed radiological images , 1995, Conference Record of The Twenty-Ninth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[44]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[45]  D. Chakraborty,et al.  Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment. , 1990, Radiology.

[46]  Carey E. Priebe,et al.  Comparative evaluation of pattern recognition techniques for detection of microcalcifications , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[47]  Bruce Kuo Ting Ho,et al.  Effect of data compression on diagnostic accuracy in digital hand and chest radiography , 1992, Medical Imaging.

[48]  W. Philip Kegelmeyer EVALUATION OF STELLATE LESION DETECTION IN A STANDARD MAMMOGRAM DATA SET , 1993 .

[49]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Mathematical Methods in Medical Imaging , 1992 .

[50]  Gregory K. Wallace,et al.  The JPEG still picture compression standard , 1992 .

[51]  John W. Woods,et al.  Subband Image Coding , 1990 .

[52]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  Subjective evaluation of compressed image quality , 1992, Medical Imaging.