Global analysis of cloud phase and ice crystal orientation from Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) data using attenuated backscattering and depolarization ratio

[1] A method for discriminating cloud particle types was developed using lidar backscattering copolarization and cross-polarization channel measurements from Cloud-Aerosol Lidar With Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) on board Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO). In spaceborne lidar measurements, significant multiple scattering effects discriminate between cloud water and ice difficult using the depolarization ratio (δ). We theoretically estimated the relationship between δ and cloud extinction on the basis of the backward Monte Carlo method. Cloud particle type was determined by the combined use of δ and the ratio of attenuated backscattering coefficients for two vertically consecutive layers. Ice particles were further classified into two categories: randomly oriented ice crystals (3-D ice) and horizontally oriented plates (2-D plate). The method was applied to CALIOP data for September–November 2006. We found that 3-D ice generally occurred colder than −20°C, whereas 2-D plate occurred between −10°C and −20°C, with high-occurrence frequency in high-latitude regions. We compared the results to those obtained using the vertical feature mask (VFM). The VFM tended to show a homogeneous cloud type through the entire cloud layer in vertical directions and misclassified 2-D plate as water. The ratio of water particles relative to ice particles decreased with decreasing temperature. By the proposed method, water cloud occurrence in subtropical and high-latitude regions was greater (up to 20%) than in the other regions below −10°C; however, the VFM results did not show such dependence on latitude. Comparison of ice and water cloud between our results and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) products showed better agreement for water cloud than for ice cloud.

[1]  E. O'connor,et al.  Characteristics of mixed‐phase clouds. II: A climatology from ground‐based lidar , 2003 .

[2]  K. Masuda,et al.  A Monte Carlo approach for the calculation of polarized light: application to an incident narrow beam , 2002 .

[3]  Hajime Okamoto,et al.  Characterization of Ze and LDR of nonspherical and inhomogeneous ice particles for 95‐GHz cloud radar: Its implication to microphysical retrievals , 2006 .

[4]  E. O'connor,et al.  The CloudSat mission and the A-train: a new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation , 2002 .

[5]  Yoshihide Takano,et al.  Radiative Transfer in Cirrus Clouds. Part III: Light Scattering by Irregular Ice Crystals , 1995 .

[6]  Yongxiang Hu,et al.  Depolarization ratio–effective lidar ratio relation: Theoretical basis for space lidar cloud phase discrimination , 2007 .

[7]  K. Liou,et al.  Solar Radiative Transfer in Cirrus Clouds. Part I: Single-Scattering and Optical Properties of Hexagonal Ice Crystals , 1989 .

[8]  T. Nakajima,et al.  Vertical cloud properties in the tropical western Pacific Ocean: Validation of the CCSR/NIES/FRCGC GCM by shipborne radar and lidar , 2008 .

[9]  J. Hansen Multiple Scattering of Polarized Light in Planetary Atmospheres Part II. Sunlight Reflected by Terrestrial Water Clouds , 1971 .

[10]  Robin J. Hogan,et al.  Estimate of the global distribution of stratiform supercooled liquid water clouds using the LITE lidar , 2004 .

[11]  Guosheng Liu,et al.  Deriving snow cloud characteristics from CloudSat observations , 2008 .

[12]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  MODIS Global Cloud-Top Pressure and Amount Estimation: Algorithm Description and Results , 2008 .

[13]  Hajime Okamoto,et al.  An algorithm for retrieval of cloud microphysics using 95-GHz cloud radar and lidar , 2003 .

[14]  David M. Winker,et al.  Classification of particle shapes from lidar depolarization ratio in convective ice clouds compared to in situ observations during CRYSTAL-FACE , 2004 .

[15]  A. Ono Growth Mode of Ice Crystals in Natural Clouds , 1970 .

[16]  Steven A. Ackerman,et al.  Global Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud detection and height evaluation using CALIOP , 2008 .

[17]  M. Kumai Formation of Ice Crystals and Dissipation of Supercooled Fog by Artificial Nucleation, and Variations of Crystal Habit at Early Growth Stages. , 1982 .

[18]  Michael D. King,et al.  Comparison of near‐infrared and thermal infrared cloud phase detections , 2006 .

[19]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Identification of cloud phase from PICASSO-CENA lidar depolarization: a multiple scattering sensitivity study , 2001 .

[20]  H. Okamoto Information content of the 95‐GHz cloud radar signals: Theoretical assessment of effects of nonsphericity and error evaluation of the discrete dipole approximation , 2002 .

[21]  K. Sassen The Polarization Lidar Technique for Cloud Research: A Review and Current Assessment , 1991 .

[22]  S. Emori,et al.  Vertical cloud structure observed from shipborne radar and lidar: Midlatitude case study during the MR01/K02 cruise of the research vessel Mirai , 2007 .

[23]  D. Deirmendjian Far-Infrared and Submillimeter Wave Attenuation by Clouds and Rain , 1975 .

[24]  Hajime Okamoto,et al.  Development of a combined CloudSat‐CALIPSO cloud mask to show global cloud distribution , 2010 .

[25]  R. Marchand,et al.  Hydrometeor Detection Using Cloudsat—An Earth-Orbiting 94-GHz Cloud Radar , 2008 .

[26]  Kenneth Sassen,et al.  A Midlatitude Cirrus Cloud Climatology from the Facility for Atmospheric Remote Sensing. Part II: Microphysical Properties Derived from Lidar Depolarization , 2001 .