Ideational Productivity, Focus of Attention, and Context

A series of 4 experiments were conducted to investigate ideational productivity. Experiments 1, 2, and 3 were carried out under controlled conditions and involved a test of ideational productivity based on producing different interpretations of a diagram. In the first experiment, the pattern of ideational produc- tivity of adult volunteer participants was studied over 30 min of thinking time. Experiment 2 investigated whether, as predicted by Mednick (1962), a negative correlation exists between the rate of change of pro- ductivity and the overall productivity of adult partici- pants. Results confirmed a significant correlation, providing further support for the connectionist model of creativity put forward by Martindale (1995). Ex- periment 3 measured the effect of a strategy that en- couraged adult volunteers to defocus their thinking before attempting to find another new interpretation of the diagram. On returning to the problem, the aver- age time taken to produce a new interpretation was significantly reduced. These results are discussed in terms of Martindale's connectionist model and the role of context. Based on these findings, an instruc- tional strategy was devised that might support the ideational productivity of children. In Experiment 4, the effectiveness of such a strategy was investigated within the classroom environment for children aged 8 to 10 years, and was shown to be effective in raising their ideational productivity. A creative idea is generally considered to possess two

[1]  W. A. Bousfield,et al.  Certain temporal characteristics of the recall of verbal associates. , 1954, The American journal of psychology.

[2]  D. Rothstein Cognition and Thought: An Information-Processing Approach. , 1966 .

[3]  A. Kirschmann,et al.  Lectures on human and animal psychology. , 2022 .

[4]  Leonard Carmichael,et al.  Manual of Child Psychology , 1947, Pediatrics.

[5]  W. A. Bousfield,et al.  An Analysis of Sequences of Restricted Associative Responses , 1944 .

[6]  U. Neisser,et al.  Cognition and thought : an information-processing approach , 1966 .

[7]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. , 1997 .

[8]  E. Torrance,et al.  The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking , 2012 .

[9]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  The creative cognition approach. , 1995 .

[10]  D. Johnson,et al.  A Mathematical Analysis of Verbal Fluency , 1951 .

[11]  Na Na An Outline of Psychoanalysis , 1949, Mental Health.

[12]  E. Kris,et al.  Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art , 1952 .

[13]  Rate and uniqueness in children's creative responding. , 1968, Child development.

[14]  S. Mednick,et al.  CONTINUAL ASSOCIATION AS A FUNCTION OF LEVEL OF CREATIVITY AND TYPE OF VERBAL STIMULUS. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[15]  K. Hoppe,et al.  Dual brain, creativity, and health , 1990 .

[16]  B. Hennessey The Social Psychology of Creativity , 2003, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[17]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1996 .

[18]  A. Pellegrini The Effects of Exploration and Play on Young Children's Associative Fluency , 1984 .

[19]  Steven M. Smith Fixation, incubation, and insight in memory and creative thinking. , 1995 .

[20]  R. Motherwell,et al.  The Dada Painters and Poets: An Anthology , 1952 .

[21]  Colin Martindale,et al.  Creativity and cortical activation during creative, intellectual and eeg feedback tasks , 1975, Biological Psychology.

[22]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  W. Ritter Event-related slow potentials of the brain: Their relation to behavior W.C. McCallum and J.R. Knott (Eds.): (Elsevier, Amsterdam and New York, 1973, 390 pp., $51.90) , 1975, Biological Psychology.

[24]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[25]  E. C. Poulton,et al.  Influential companions: Effects of one strategy on another in the within-subjects designs of cognitive psychology. , 1982 .

[26]  V. Fu,et al.  Original Thinking in Preschool Children. , 1983 .

[27]  D. K. Forgays,et al.  Creativity enhancement through flotation isolation , 1992 .

[28]  R. Harré,et al.  Experimentation in Psychology , 1976 .

[29]  C. Martindale Creativity and connectionism. , 1995 .

[30]  C. Martindale Personality, situation, and creativity. , 1989 .

[31]  G. Davies,et al.  Memory in context : context in memory , 1990 .

[32]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  The Positive Impact of Creative Activity: Effects of Creative Task Engagement and Motivational Focus on College Students' Learning , 1995 .

[33]  L. Hearnshaw,et al.  The comparative psychology of mental development , 1966 .

[34]  N. Jausovec Differences in EEG Activity During the Solution of Closed and Open Problems , 1997 .

[35]  Tom Puk Creating a quantum design schema: Integrating extra-rational and rational learning processes , 1995 .

[36]  S. Mednick The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[37]  Alan S. Brown An empirical verification of Mednick’s associative theory of creativity , 1973 .

[38]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: memory retrieval as a model case. , 1995, Psychological review.

[39]  J. Easterbrook The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. , 1959, Psychological review.

[40]  D. Campbell Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. , 1960, Psychological review.

[41]  R. Sternberg Handbook of Creativity: Subject Index , 1998 .

[42]  T. M. Amabile,et al.  Social influences on creativity: the effects of contracted-for reward. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  E. Callaway,et al.  The influence of amobarbital (amylobarbitone) and methamphetamine on the focus of attention. , 1959, The Journal of mental science.

[44]  Aharon Kantorovich,et al.  Scientific discovery : logic and tinkering , 1993 .

[45]  Steven M. Smith Environmental context—dependent memory. , 1988 .