Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A Boothroyd,et al. Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] P C Loizou,et al. On the number of channels needed to understand speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] F. Zeng,et al. Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] M F Dorman,et al. Recognition of Monosyllabic Words by Cochlear Implant Patients and by Normal-Hearing Subjects Listening to Words Processed through Cochlear Implant Signal Processing Strategies , 2000, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.
[5] R V Shannon,et al. Consonant recordings for speech testing. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] R V Shannon,et al. Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[7] Taehong Cho,et al. Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives , 2002, J. Phonetics.
[8] K. Stevens. Acoustic correlates of some phonetic categories. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] R. Shannon,et al. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] P C Loizou,et al. Speech recognition by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners as a function of intensity resolution. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] M W Skinner,et al. Identification of Speech by Cochlear Implant Recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) Speech Coding Strategies I. Vowels , 1996, Ear and hearing.
[12] J. Hillenbrand,et al. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] E. M. Burns,et al. Played-again SAM: Further observations on the pitch of amplitude-modulated noise , 1981 .
[14] Q J Fu,et al. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] S. Rosen. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[16] G. E. Peterson,et al. Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .
[17] Qian-Jie Fu,et al. The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation. , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.
[18] D T Lawson,et al. Temporal representations with cochlear implants. , 1997, The American journal of otology.
[19] S. Blumstein,et al. Acoustic invariance in speech production: evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Temporal pitch in electric hearing , 2002, Hearing Research.
[21] G. A. Miller,et al. An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .
[22] M. Demorest,et al. Speech recognition at simulated soft, conversational, and raised-to-loud vocal efforts by adults with cochlear implants. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] Jean‐Pierre A. Radley,et al. Acoustic Properties of Stop Consonants , 1957 .
[24] B J Gantz,et al. Performance over time with a nucleus or Ineraid cochlear implant. , 1992, Ear and hearing.
[25] D J Van Tasell,et al. Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] San Duanmu,et al. “Tense” and “Lax” Stops in Korean , 2004 .
[27] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[28] B. Moore,et al. Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noise , 1993 .
[29] N. Viemeister. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] Mieko S. Han,et al. Acoustic Features of Korean /P, T, K/, /p, t, k/ and /ph, th, kh/ , 1970 .
[31] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Music Perception with Temporal Cues in Acoustic and Electric Hearing , 2004, Ear and hearing.
[32] F B Simmons,et al. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.
[33] T A Ricketts,et al. The effects of compression ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and level on speech recognition in normal-hearing listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] M. Dorman,et al. Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[35] F. J. Hill,et al. Speech recognition as a function of channel capacity in a discrete set of channels. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] R. Shannon. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics , 1983, Hearing Research.
[37] Robert S Hong,et al. Signal Coding in Cochlear Implants: Exploiting Stochastic Effects of Electrical Stimulation , 2003, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.
[38] D. D. Greenwood. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. I. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] A Kohlrausch,et al. Intrinsic envelope fluctuations and modulation-detection thresholds for narrow-band noise carriers. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[41] Ying-Yee Kong,et al. Temporal and spectral cues in Mandarin tone recognition , 2004 .
[42] R S Tyler,et al. The recognition of vowels differing by a single formant by cochlear-implant subjects. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[44] E Villchur. Electronic models to simulate the effect of sensory distortions on speech perception by the deaf. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[45] M W Skinner,et al. Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the multipeak (MPEAK) and spectral peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies II. Consonants. , 1996, Ear and hearing.
[46] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[47] M. D. Wang,et al. Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[48] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[49] R V Shannon,et al. Effects of electrode location and spacing on phoneme recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. , 1999, Ear and hearing.
[50] Tom Tremain. Analysis and synthesis of speech , 1995 .
[51] N. Viemeister,et al. Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[52] M F Dorman,et al. The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[53] P. Belafsky,et al. Topical Nasal Anesthesia and Laryngopharyngeal Sensory Testing: A Prospective, Double-Blind Crossover Study , 2003, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.
[54] B C Moore,et al. Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[55] A van Wieringen,et al. Natural vowel and consonant recognition by Laura cochlear implantees. , 1999, Ear and hearing.
[56] R. Shannon,et al. Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[57] Manfred R. Schroeder,et al. Vocoders: Analysis and synthesis of speech , 1966 .
[58] R S Tyler,et al. Consonant recognition by some of the better cochlear-implant patients. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[59] Belinda A Henry,et al. The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[60] R. Shannon. Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[61] Bruce J Gantz,et al. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[63] Bryan E Pfingst,et al. Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[64] Margaret W Skinner,et al. Nucleus® 24 Advanced Encoder Conversion Study: Performance versus Preference , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[65] A. Boothroyd,et al. Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognition. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.