Binding theory and grammatical specific language impairment in children

This study investigates the intrasentential assignment of reference to pronouns (him, her) and anaphors (himself, herself) as characterized by Binding Theory in a subgroup of "Grammatical specifically language-impaired" (SLI) children. The study aims to (1) provide further insight into the underlying nature of Grammatical SLI in children and (2) elucidate the relationship between different sources of knowledge, that is, syntactic knowledge versus knowledge of lexical properties and pragmatic inference in the assignment of intrasentential coreference. In two experiments, using a picture-sentence pair judgement task, the children's knowledge of the lexical properties versus syntactic knowledge (Binding Principles A and B) in the assignment of reflexives and pronouns was investigated. The responses of 12 Grammatical SLI children (aged 9:3 to 12:10) and three language ability (LA) control groups of 12 children (aged 5:9 to 9:1) were compared. The results indicated that the SLI children and the LA controls may use a combination of conceptual-lexical and pragmatic knowledge (e.g., semantic gender, reflexive marking of the predicate, and assignment of theta roles) to help assign reference to anaphors and pronouns. The LA controls also showed appropriate use of the syntactic knowledge. In contrast, the SLI children performed at chance when syntactic information was crucially required to rule out inappropriate coreference. The data are consistent with an impairment with the (innate) syntactic knowledge characterized by Binding Theory which underlies reference assignment to anaphors and pronouns. We conclude that the SLI children's syntactic representation is underspecified with respect to coindexation between constituents and the syntactic properties of pronouns. Support is provided for the proposal that Grammatical SLI children have a modular language deficit with syntactic dependent structural relationships between constituents, that is, a Representational Deficit with Dependent Relationships (RDDR). Further consideration of the linguistic characteristics of this deficit is made in relation to the hypothesized syntactic representations of young normally developing children.

[1]  S Baron-Cohen,et al.  Are children with autism deaf to gricean maxims? , 1996, Cognitive neuropsychiatry.

[2]  W. Burkitt.  Extended family. , 1968, British medical journal.

[3]  H. V. D. Lely.  Language modularity and grammatically specific language impaired children , 1994 .

[4]  D Howard,et al.  Children with specific language impairment: linguistic impairment or short-term memory deficit? , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  Heather K. J. van der Lely,et al.  Narrative discourse in Grammatical specific language impaired children : a modular language deficit ? * , 1997 .

[6]  Thomas Roeper,et al.  Barriers, Binding, and Acquisition of the DP-NP Distinction , 1995 .

[7]  P J Connell.  Teaching subjecthood to language-disordered children. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Child Language and Developmental Dysphasia: Linguistic studies of the acquisition of German , 1991 .

[9]  Barbara Lust.  Defining the constraints , 1986 .

[10]  Rohe N. Eshbaugh.  Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities. , 1971 .

[11]  P. Fletcher,et al.  Specific Speech and Language Disorders in Children , 1992 .

[12]  Laurence B. Leonard,et al.  Morphological Deficits in Children With Specific Language Impairment: The Status of Features in the Underlying Grammar , 1992 .

[13]  M L Rice,et al.  Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  T. Reinhart,et al.  The innateness of binding and coreference , 1993 .

[15]  H. V. D. van der Lely.  Specific language impairment in children: research findings and their therapeutic implications. , 1993, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[16]  Elena Plante,et al.  MRI findings in boys with specific language impairment , 1991, Brain and Language.

[17]  H. V. D. Lely,et al.  Sentence comprehension strategies in specifically language impaired children. , 1986, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[18]  M. Rita Manzini,et al.  Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory , 1987 .

[19]  B. D. Schwartz,et al.  Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar , 1994 .

[20]  J. Hurst,et al.  An extended Family with a Dominantly Inherited Speech Disorder , 1990, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[21]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[22]  Mabel L. Rice,et al.  Specific Language Impairments in Children. , 1994 .

[23]  H. Lytton.  An extended family. , 1981 .

[24]  Chien Yu-Chin,et al.  Children's Knowledge of Locality Conditions in Binding as Evidence for the Modularity of Syntax and Pragmatics , 1990 .

[25]  Mürvet Enç.  Anchoring conditions for tense , 1987 .

[26]  Celia Jakubowicz,et al.  Linguistic Theory and Language Acquisition Facts: Reformulation, Maturation or Invariance of Binding Principles , 1993 .

[27]  Stephen Crain,et al.  On the acquisition of pronominal reference: Review of: L. Solan, Pronominal reference: Child language and the theory of grammar , 1985 .

[28]  M. Harris,et al.  Comprehension of reversible sentences in specifically language-impaired children. , 1990, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[29]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Child language and developmental dysphasia , 1991 .

[30]  D. Bishop.  Comprehension of spoken, written and signed sentences in childhood language disorders. , 1982, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[31]  M. R. Manzini.  From Merge and Move to Form Dependency * , 1995 .

[32]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Some Notes on Linguistic Theory and Language Development: The Case of Root Infinitives , 1993 .

[33]  H. Clahsen,et al.  The grammatical characterization of developmental dysphasia , 1989 .

[34]  Lawrence M. Solan,et al.  The Acquisition of Structural Restrictions on Anaphora , 1981 .

[35]  K. Wexler,et al.  Development of Principle B in Russian: Coindexation at LF and Coreference , 1992 .

[36]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Knowledge and Obedience: The Developmental Status of the Binding Theory , 1990 .

[37]  References , 1971 .

[38]  D. Aram,et al.  Clinical and research congruence in identifying children with specific language impairment. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[39]  Barbara Lust.  Applying the constraints , 1987 .

[40]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Functional Categories in Early Child German , 1993 .

[41]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax: The Nature of Early Child Grammars of English , 1990 .

[42]  B. Lust.  Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora , 1986 .

[43]  Barbara Lust,et al.  Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora, I: Defining the Constraints , 1988 .

[44]  M. Gopnik,et al.  Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder , 1991, Cognition.

[45]  Heather K. J. van der Lely,et al.  Specifically language impaired and normally developing children : Verbal passive vs. adjectival passive sentence interpretation , 1996 .

[46]  H. V. D. Lely,et al.  A Grammatical Specific Language Impairment in Children: An Autosomal Dominant Inheritance? , 1996, Brain and Language.

[47]  H. V. D. Lely.  Specific language impairment in children: research findings and their therapeutic implications , 1993 .

[48]  K. Wexler,et al.  Verb movement: Finiteness and head movement in early child grammars , 1994 .

[49]  D. Bishop,et al.  Conversational characteristics of children with semantic-pragmatic disorder. I: Exchange structure, turntaking, repairs and cohesion. , 1989, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[50]  Heather K. J. van der Lely,et al.  Canonical linking rules: forward versus reverse linking in normally developing and specifically language-impaired children , 1994, Cognition.

[51]  L B Leonard,et al.  Grammatical morphology and speech perception in children with specific language impairment. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[52]  Ianthi Maria Tsimpli,et al.  Functional categories and maturation : the prefunctional stage of language acquisition , 1992 .

[53]  Laurence B. Leonard,et al.  Language learnability and specific language impairment in children , 1989, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[54]  J. Koster,et al.  What can we learn from children’s errors in understanding anaphora? , 1986 .

[55]  H K van der Lely.  Narrative discourse in Grammatical specific language impaired children: a modular language deficit? , 1997, Journal of child language.

[56]  Noam Chomsky.  A minimalist program for linguistic theory , 1992 .

[57]  Kenneth Wexler.  Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivation in child grammar , 1992 .

[58]  S. Naidoo,et al.  Children with specific speech and language impairment , 1991 .

[59]  C Donlan,et al.  GENETIC BASIS OF SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT: EVIDENCE FROM A TWIN STUDY , 1995, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[60]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  The Seeds of Structure: A Syntactic analysis of the acquisition of Case marking , 1994 .

[61]  Do Children Really Know Condition A , 1993 .

[62]  Myrna Gopnik,et al.  Feature Blindness: A Case Study , 1990 .

[63]  Elena Plante,et al.  MRI findings in the parents and siblings of specifically language-impaired boys , 1991, Brain and Language.

[64]  Dana McDaniel,et al.  Binding Principles in the Grammars of Young Children , 1990 .

[65]  D. V. M. Bishop,et al.  Grammatical errors in specific language impairment: Competence or performance limitations? , 1994, Applied Psycholinguistics.