The Dissociation between Early and Late Selection in Older Adults

Older adults exhibit a reduced ability to ignore task-irrelevant stimuli; however, it remains to be determined where along the information processing stream the most salient age-associated changes occur. In the current study, ERPs provided an opportunity to determine whether age-related differences in processing task-irrelevant stimuli were uniform across information processing stages or disproportionately affected either early or late selection. ERPs were measured in young and old adults during a color-selective attention task in which participants responded to target letters in a specified color (attend condition) while ignoring letters in a different color (ignore condition). Old participants were matched to two groups of young participants on the basis of neuropsychological test performance: one using age-appropriate norms and the other using test scores not adjusted for age. There were no age-associated differences in the magnitude of early selection (attend–ignore), as indexed by the size of the anterior selection positivity and posterior selection negativity. During late selection, as indexed by P3b amplitude, both groups of young participants generated neural responses to target letters under the attend versus ignore conditions that were highly differentiated. In striking contrast, old participants generated a P3b to target letters with no reliable differences between conditions. Individuals who were slow to initiate early selection appeared to be less successful at executing late selection. Despite relative preservation of the operations of early selection, processing delays may lead older participants to allocate excessive resources to task-irrelevant stimuli during late selection.

[1]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  Michael Falkenstein,et al.  Age-related differences in performance and stimulus processing in dual task situation , 2011, Brain Research.

[3]  R. West,et al.  Visual distraction, working memory, and aging , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[4]  D Friedman,et al.  An overview of age-related changes in the scalp distribution of P3b. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  P. Ghisletta,et al.  A dynamic investigation of cognitive dedifferentiation with control for retest: evidence from the Swiss Interdisciplinary Longitudinal Study on the Oldest Old. , 2005, Psychology and aging.

[6]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[7]  Brittany R. Alperin,et al.  Age-related decline in differentiated neural responses to rare target versus frequent standard stimuli , 2014, Brain Research.

[8]  J. Yesavage,et al.  Context processing in older adults: evidence for a theory relating cognitive control to neurobiology in healthy aging. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  P. Baltes,et al.  Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: a new window to the study of cognitive aging? , 1997, Psychology and aging.

[10]  G. Smith,et al.  Slowness and age: speed-accuracy mechanisms. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[11]  D. Tucker,et al.  Frontal evaluation and posterior representation in target detection. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[12]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  G. Brébion,et al.  Language Processing, Slowing, and Speed/Accuracy Trade-Off in the Elderly , 2001, Experimental aging research.

[14]  Albert Kok,et al.  Cerebral event-related potentials associated with selective attention to color: Developmental changes from childhood to adulthood , 1998 .

[15]  Denise C. Park,et al.  The adaptive brain: aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  E. Walker,et al.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[17]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.

[18]  H. Semlitsch,et al.  Multichannel auditory event-related brain potentials: effects of normal aging on the scalp distribution of N1, P2, N2 and P300 latencies and amplitudes. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  Hauke R. Heekeren,et al.  Normal Aging Delays and Compromises Early Multifocal Visual Attention during Object Tracking , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  E Donchin,et al.  A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. , 1981, Science.

[21]  Zara M. Bergström,et al.  Behavioral and ERP evidence of greater distractor processing in old age , 2009, Brain Research.

[22]  Theodore P. Zanto,et al.  Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Early Top–Down Control of Visual Processing Predicts Working Memory Performance , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Brittany R. Alperin,et al.  Investigating the age-related "anterior shift" in the scalp distribution of the P3b component using principal component analysis. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[25]  Glenn F. Wilson,et al.  Task decision difficulty: effects on ERPs in a same-different letter classification task , 1994, Biological Psychology.

[26]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  The Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in the Elderly Brain: A Structural Model-Based Approach , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  A Kok,et al.  Selective processing of two-dimensional visual stimuli in young and old subjects: electrophysiological analysis. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[28]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Temporal dynamics of early perceptual processing , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[29]  Bruno Kopp,et al.  Temporal dynamics of selective attention and conflict resolution during cross-dimensional go-nogo decisions , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[30]  P. Rabbitt How old and young subjects monitor and control responses for accuracy and speed , 1979 .

[31]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Predictive knowledge of stimulus relevance does not influence top-down suppression of irrelevant information in older adults , 2010, Cortex.

[32]  Andreas Keil,et al.  Neuronal Synchronization and Selective Color Processing in the Human Brain , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[35]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Compensatory neural activity distinguishes different patterns of normal cognitive aging , 2008, NeuroImage.

[36]  T. Salthouse The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[37]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Aging and inhibition: beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[38]  Joseph J. Ryan,et al.  A screening procedure for estimating premorbid intelligence in the elderly , 1992 .

[39]  Hyemi Chong,et al.  Cognitive status impacts age-related changes in attention to novel and target events in normal adults. , 2007, Neuropsychology.

[40]  V. Leirer,et al.  Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. , 1982, Journal of psychiatric research.

[41]  Andreas Keil,et al.  Selective Processing of Multiple Features in the Human Brain: Effects of Feature Type and Salience , 2011, PloS one.

[42]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  The influence of executive capacity on selective attention and subsequent processing , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[43]  D. Filion,et al.  Aging, selective attention, and inhibitory processes: a psychophysiological approach. , 1992, Psychology and Aging.

[44]  T. Curran,et al.  Effects of aging on visuospatial attention: an ERP study , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Age differences in attentional control: an event-related potential approach. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[46]  I Czigler,et al.  Age, color processing and meaningfulness: an event-related potential study. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[47]  Joaquin A. Anguera,et al.  Dissociation of motor and sensory inhibition processes in normal aging , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[48]  R. Knight,et al.  Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Does compensatory neural activity survive old-old age? , 2011, NeuroImage.

[50]  Kirk R. Daffner,et al.  Age-related changes in early novelty processing as measured by ERPs , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[51]  A. Kok,et al.  Early and late selection in young and old adults: an event-related potential study. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[52]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Mechanisms Underlying Age- and Performance-related Differences in Working Memory , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .

[54]  David A. Bennett,et al.  Neural intrinsic connectivity networks associated with risk aversion in old age , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[55]  J. Botwinick Aging and Behavior , 1984, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[56]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[57]  A. Kok On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[58]  Siu Cheung Li,et al.  Cross-level unification: A computational exploration of the link between deterioration of neurotrans , 1999 .

[59]  M. Fabiani,et al.  Individual differences in P3 scalp distribution in older adults, and their relationship to frontal lobe function. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[60]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[61]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System , 2012 .

[62]  Kristine B Walhovd,et al.  Life-span changes in P3a. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[63]  R. West,et al.  The Effects of Aging on Controlled Attention and Conflict Processing in the Stroop Task , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  Anna E. Haring,et al.  Age-related differences in enhancement and suppression of neural activity underlying selective attention in matched young and old adults , 2013, Brain Research.

[65]  Michael Falkenstein,et al.  Flanker interference in young and older participants as reflected in event-related potentials , 2008, Brain Research.

[66]  D. Wechsler Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale , 2021, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[67]  Risa Sawaki,et al.  Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[68]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[69]  T. Toulopoulou,et al.  Assessment of executive functions: review of instruments and identification of critical issues. , 2008, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[70]  Dc Washington Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed. , 1994 .

[71]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Increased Responsiveness to Novelty is Associated with Successful Cognitive Aging , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[72]  E Donchin,et al.  Resource reciprocity: an event-related brain potentials analysis. , 1989, Acta psychologica.

[73]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[74]  E. Tangalos,et al.  Neuropsychological tests' norms above age 55: COWAT, BNT, MAE token, WRAT-R reading, AMNART, STROOP, TMT, and JLO , 1996 .

[75]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Does modulation of selective attention to features reflect enhancement or suppression of neural activity? , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[76]  C. Frith,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention , 2001, Science.

[77]  A Kok,et al.  Cerebral event-related potentials associated with selective attention to color: developmental changes from childhood to adulthood. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[78]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Dedifferentiation in the visual cortex: An fMRI investigation of individual differences in older adults , 2008, Brain Research.

[79]  C Alain,et al.  Age-related decline in inhibitory control contributes to the increased Stroop effect observed in older adults. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[80]  M. Schlossberg The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and Clinical Interpretation. , 1986 .

[81]  N. Cohen,et al.  Attentional Control in the Aging Brain: Insights from an fMRI Study of the Stroop Task , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[82]  J. J. Ryan,et al.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III , 2001 .

[83]  E. Donchin,et al.  Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. , 1983, Science.

[84]  Matthew W. Miller,et al.  A novel approach to the physiological measurement of mental workload. , 2011, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[85]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Age differences in task switching and response monitoring: Evidence from ERPs , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[86]  Risa Sawaki,et al.  Distractor P3 is associated with attentional capture by stimulus deviance , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[87]  Shulan Hsieh,et al.  Elderly adults through compensatory responses can be just as capable as young adults in inhibiting the flanker influence , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[88]  H. Levin A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary , 1993 .

[89]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Que PASA? The posterior-anterior shift in aging. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[90]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Age-related changes in hemispheric organization , 2005 .

[91]  R. K. Simpson Nature Neuroscience , 2022 .

[92]  O. Spreen,et al.  A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary , 1991 .

[93]  Risto N t nen Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[94]  J. Botwinick,et al.  Cautiousness in advanced age. , 1966, Journal of gerontology.

[95]  G Mulder,et al.  Attention to color: an analysis of selection, controlled search, and motor activation, using event-related potentials. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[96]  T. Robbins,et al.  Risk taking during decision-making in normal volunteers changes with age , 2004, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[97]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a "new view" , 2007 .

[98]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Selective attention to spatial and non-spatial visual stimuli is affected differentially by age: effects on event-related brain potentials and performance data. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[99]  L. Lorenzo-López,et al.  Visual target processing in high- and low-performing older subjects indexed by P3 component , 2007, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.