Public perceptions of quarantine: community-based telephone survey following an infectious disease outbreak

BackgroundThe use of restrictive measures such as quarantine draws into sharp relief the dynamic interplay between the individual rights of the citizen on the one hand and the collective rights of the community on the other. Concerns regarding infectious disease outbreaks (SARS, pandemic influenza) have intensified the need to understand public perceptions of quarantine and other social distancing measures.MethodsWe conducted a telephone survey of the general population in the Greater Toronto Area in Ontario, Canada. Computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) technology was used. A final sample of 500 individuals was achieved through standard random-digit dialing.ResultsOur data indicate strong public support for the use of quarantine when required and for serious legal sanctions against those who fail to comply. This support is contingent both on the implementation of legal safeguards to protect against inappropriate use and on the provision of psychosocial supports for those affected.ConclusionTo engender strong public support for quarantine and other restrictive measures, government officials and public health policy-makers would do well to implement a comprehensive system of supports and safeguards, to educate and inform frontline public health workers, and to engage the public at large in an open dialogue on the ethical use of restrictive measures during infectious disease outbreaks.

[1]  G. Annas.  Bioterrorism, public health, and human rights. , 2002, Health affairs.

[2]  Howard Markel,et al.  Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Implemented by US Cities During the 1918–1919 Influenza Pandemic , 2008 .

[3]  M. Bernstein,et al.  Ethics and SARS: lessons from Toronto , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  R. Bayer,et al.  Public Health vs. Civil Liberties , 2002, Science.

[5]  Troy Day,et al.  When Is Quarantine a Useful Control Strategy for Emerging Infectious Diseases? , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  H. Beanlands,et al.  Risk perception and compliance with quarantine during the SARS outbreak. , 2005, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[7]  R. Schabas.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome: Did quarantine help? , 2004, The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale.

[8]  C. Digiovanni,et al.  Factors influencing compliance with quarantine in Toronto during the 2003 SARS outbreak. , 2004, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[9]  D. Stewart,et al.  The Psychosocial Effects of Being Quarantined following Exposure to SARS: A Qualitative Study of Toronto Health Care Workers , 2004, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[10]  J. Barry.  Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Implemented During the 1918-1919 Influenza Pandemic , 2007 .

[11]  M. Cetron,et al.  Attitudes toward the use of quarantine in a public health emergency in four countries. , 2006, Health affairs.

[12]  Xinghuo Pang,et al.  Evaluation of control measures implemented in the severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak in Beijing, 2003. , 2003, JAMA.

[13]  Ross Upshur,et al.  Evidence and effectiveness in decisionmaking for quarantine. , 2007, American journal of public health.

[14]  Sze-Bi Hsu,et al.  Impact of quarantine on the 2003 SARS outbreak: A retrospective modeling study , 2006, Journal of Theoretical Biology.

[15]  Ross Upshur.  Public engagement on social distancing in a pandemic: a Canadian perspective. , 2009, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[16]  N. Ries,et al.  Public health law and ethics: lessons from SARS and quarantine. , 2004, Health law review.

[17]  R. Schabas.  Is the Quarantine Act relevant? , 2007, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[18]  L. Gostin,et al.  Ethical and legal challenges posed by severe acute respiratory syndrome: implications for the control of severe infectious disease threats. , 2003, JAMA.

[19]  H. Hull,et al.  SARS Control and Psychological Effects of Quarantine, Toronto, Canada , 2005, Emerging infectious diseases.

[20]  L. Gostin,et al.  Public health strategies for pandemic influenza: ethics and the law. , 2006, JAMA.

[21]  J. A. Navarro,et al.  Nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented by US cities during the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic. , 2007, JAMA.

[22]  A. Mandavilli.  SARS epidemic unmasks age-old quarantine conundrum , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[23]  M. Lipsitch,et al.  Public health interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemic , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Ross Upshur,et al.  Principles for the Justification of Public Health Intervention , 2002, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[25]  C. DesRoches,et al.  The public's response to severe acute respiratory syndrome in Toronto and the United States. , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[26]  Elizabeth Rea,et al.  Public health measures to control the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome during the outbreak in Toronto. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  Arthur S Slutsky,et al.  One-year outcomes and health care utilization in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[28]  S. Galea,et al.  SARS Control and Psychological Effects of Quarantine, Toronto, Canada , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.