Probabilistic affine invariants for recognition

Under a weak perspective camera model, the image plane coordinates in different views of a planar object are related by an affine transformation. Because of this property, researchers have attempted to use affine invariants for recognition. However, there are two problems with this approach: (1) objects or object classes with inherent variability cannot be adequately treated using invariants; and (2) in practice the calculated affine invariants can be quite sensitive to errors in the image plane measurements. In this paper we use probability distributions to address both of these difficulties. Under the assumption that the feature positions of a planar object can be modeled using a jointly Gaussian density, we have derived the joint density over the corresponding set of affine coordinates. Even when the assumptions of a planar object and a weak perspective camera model do not strictly hold, the results are useful because deviations from the ideal can be treated as deformability in the underlying object model.

[1]  D. Kendall SHAPE MANIFOLDS, PROCRUSTEAN METRICS, AND COMPLEX PROJECTIVE SPACES , 1984 .

[2]  Editors , 1986, Brain Research Bulletin.

[3]  F. Bookstein Size and Shape Spaces for Landmark Data in Two Dimensions , 1986 .

[4]  L Sirovich,et al.  Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  Haim J. Wolfson,et al.  Model-Based Object Recognition by Geometric Hashing , 1990, ECCV.

[6]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Optimal affine-invariant point matching , 1990, [1990] Proceedings. 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[7]  A. Yuille Deformable Templates for Face Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  K. Mardia,et al.  General shape distributions in a plane , 1991, Advances in Applied Probability.

[9]  David W. Lewis,et al.  Matrix theory , 1991 .

[10]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Geometric invariance in computer vision , 1992 .

[11]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  A Study of Affine Matching With Bounded Sensor Error , 1992, ECCV.

[12]  Christoph von der Malsburg,et al.  A Neural System for the Recognition of Partially Occluded Objects in Cluttered Scenes: A Pilot Study , 1993, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[13]  Y. C. Hecker,et al.  On Geometric Hashing and the Generalized Hough Transform , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[14]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Automating the hunt for volcanoes on Venus , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[15]  David W. Jacobs,et al.  Error propagation in full 3D-from-2D object recognition , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[16]  Michael C. Burl,et al.  Finding faces in cluttered scenes using random labeled graph matching , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[17]  P. Perona,et al.  Face Localization via Shape Statistics , 1995 .

[18]  F. Dehne,et al.  Hypercube algorithms for parallel processing of pointer-based quadtrees , 1995 .

[19]  Isidore Rigoutsos,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Model Matching with Geometric Hashing , 1995, Computer Vision and Image Understanding.

[20]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Recognition of planar object classes , 1996, Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[21]  T. K. Leungz,et al.  Recognition of Visual Object Classes , 1996 .

[22]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Neural network-based face detection , 1996, Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[23]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Locating Objects of Varying Shape Using Statistical Feature Detectors , 1996, ECCV.

[24]  Tomaso A. Poggio,et al.  Example-Based Learning for View-Based Human Face Detection , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..