Photoanthropometry in forensics: Comparison of facial images with frontal and lateral views

Photoanthropometry quantify the facial proportions of an individual facilitating the comparison of facial patterns for human identification. The coordinates and vertical distances in pixels of the photoanthropometric landmarks on images of the same individual in frontal and profile views were analyzed and compared. A total of 116 pairs of photographs of Brazilian individuals were evaluated. The photographs were adjusted in size and rotation, and marked in the software Two-dimensional Forensic Facial Analysis System. For each face, 16 landmarks were considered: glabella (g), nasion (n), ectocanthion (ec), pronasale (prn), subnasale (sn), alare (al), cheilion (ch), upper lip (ls), lower lip (li), stomion (sto), labiomental (lm), gnathion (gn), superaurale (sa), subaurale (sba), postaurale (pa) and upper ear lobe (slb); the xand y-coordinates of each landmark were obtained. Twenty-seven vertical distances between the points were proposed, which were measured by subtracting the values of the y-coordinate. The data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and MannWhitney test (α=5%). The mean age of the sample was 25.9 years (± 4.7), and 50.9% (n=59) were males. When the coordinates were evaluated, a low correlation was obtained between the images (ICC<0.4). Of the 27 proposed measures, 77.7% (n=21) indicated agreement between the images in the two views (p>0.05). A comparison of ls-g, saec, pa-ec, slb-ec, sba-sa and slb-sa showed disagreement between the images. Therefore, there is agreement between the facial measures in the frontal and lateral images, except for ls-g and for the distances between the ear landmarks.

[1]  C. Berkowitz,et al.  Child pornography: legal and medical considerations. , 2009, Advances in pediatrics.

[2]  Pasquale Poppa,et al.  Can facial proportions taken from images be of use for ageing in cases of suspected child pornography? A pilot study , 2011, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[3]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  Marina de Andrade Marconi,et al.  Fundamentos de Metodologia Científica , 2003 .

[5]  Mário Marques Fernandes,et al.  Correcting the planar perspective projection in geometric structures applied to forensic facial analysis. , 2016, Forensic science international.

[6]  G. Porter,et al.  An anatomical and photographic technique for forensic facial identification. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[7]  Matteo D Gallidabino,et al.  Comparative Assessment of a Novel Photo‐Anthropometric Landmark‐Positioning Approach for the Analysis of Facial Structures on Two‐Dimensional Images , 2018, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  M Steyn,et al.  Photo identification: facial metrical and morphological features in South African males. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[9]  D De Angelis,et al.  Metric and morphological assessment of facial features: a study on three European populations. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[10]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Are facial image analysis experts any better than the general public at identifying individuals from CCTV images? , 2009, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[11]  Josh P Davis,et al.  Computer assisted photo-anthropometric analyses of full-face and profile facial images. , 2010, Forensic science international.

[12]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[13]  M. L. A. Banu,et al.  Photo-anthropometric study on face among Garo adult females of Bangladesh. , 2014, Bangladesh Medical Research Council bulletin.

[14]  Mehmet Yaşar İşcan,et al.  Forensic Analysis of the Skull , 2004 .

[15]  J E Allanson,et al.  Objective techniques for craniofacial assessment: what are the choices? , 1997, American journal of medical genetics.

[16]  A. Farrera,et al.  Quantitative assessment of the facial features of a Mexican population dataset. , 2016, Forensic science international.

[17]  Caroline Wilkinson,et al.  Juvenile age estimation from facial images. , 2017, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[18]  A. Franco,et al.  Applicability of a pre-established set of facial proportions from frontal photographs in forensic age estimation of a Brazilian population. , 2019, Forensic science international.

[19]  Carlos Eduardo Palhares Machado,et al.  A new approach for the analysis of facial growth and age estimation: Iris ratio , 2017, PloS one.

[20]  E. Michel-Crosato,et al.  Photoanthropometry of the Face in the Young White Brazilian Population. , 2018, Brazilian dental journal.

[21]  Enrico Grosso,et al.  Dynamic face recognition: From human to machine vision , 2009, Image Vis. Comput..

[22]  Reuben Moreton,et al.  Investigation into the use of photoanthropometry in facial image comparison. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[23]  S Miyasaka,et al.  Photo anthropometric variations in Japanese facial features: Establishment of large-sample standard reference data for personal identification using a three-dimensional capture system. , 2015, Forensic science international.

[24]  John C. Nesbit,et al.  Learning Object Evaluation: Computer-Mediated Collaboration And Inter-Rater Reliability , 2003 .

[25]  Marta R P Flores,et al.  Photoanthropometric face iridial proportions for age estimation: An investigation using features selected via a joint mutual information criterion. , 2017, Forensic science international.