The Tangled Web: Unraveling the Principle of Common Goals in Collaborations

This article addresses a “goals paradox” that suggests that both congruence and diversity in organizations’ goals influence success in collaboration. Using extensive empirical data, we develop a framework that portrays goals as an entangled, dynamic, and ambiguously hierarchical web of variously perceived, higher- and lower-level goals that can be characterized across six dimensions: level, origin, authenticity, relevance, content, and overtness. We then explore the paradox in terms of the framework and so propose a much elaborated theoretical understanding of it. This provides theoretical and practical understanding relevant to management and governance in and of collaboration.

[1]  Anna A. Amirkhanyan Collaborative Performance Measurement: Examining and Explaining the Prevalence of Collaboration in State and Local Government Contracts , 2009 .

[2]  Sue R. Faerman,et al.  The Paradoxical Nature of Collaboration , 2014 .

[3]  Steve Vincent,et al.  Going Privately: Partnership and Outsourcing in UK Public Services , 2002 .

[4]  Thomas B. Lawrence,et al.  Researching organizations using action research , 2006 .

[5]  Garrick L. Percival Exploring the Influence of Local Policy Networks on the Implementation of Drug Policy Reform: The Case of California's Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act , 2009 .

[6]  C. Ansell,et al.  Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[7]  Charlie Galibert Some preliminary notes on actor–observer anthropology , 2004 .

[8]  H. Volberda,et al.  Towards a Dialectic Perspective on Formalization in Interorganizational Relationships: How Alliance Managers Capitalize on the Duality Inherent in Contracts, Rules and Procedures , 2007 .

[9]  Chris Huxham,et al.  Doing things collaboratively: Realizing the advantage or succumbing to inertia? , 2004 .

[10]  Ann Taket,et al.  Doing Critical Management Research , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[11]  Stafford Beer,et al.  Redesigning the Future: A Systems Approach to Societal Problems , 1976 .

[12]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing , 2011 .

[13]  J. Perry,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Collaboration , 2007 .

[14]  C. Huxham,et al.  Researching Organizational Practice through Action Research: Case Studies and Design Choices , 2003 .

[15]  Alison Gehring Policy and politics , 2007, The journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health.

[16]  H. Simon,et al.  On the concept of organizational goal. , 1964 .

[17]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[18]  Karen Locke,et al.  Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince , 1993 .

[19]  Chris Huxham,et al.  Action research as a methodology for theory development , 2003 .

[20]  Michael McGuire,et al.  Big Questions in Public Network Management Research , 2001 .

[21]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[22]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[23]  Harold D. Lasswell,et al.  The Policy Sciences , 1953 .

[24]  J. Perry,et al.  Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box , 2006 .

[25]  K. Cameron,et al.  Paradox and transformation : toward a theory of change in organization and management , 1990 .

[26]  Rosemary O'Leary,et al.  The Collaborative Public Manager , 2009 .

[27]  Eric Trist,et al.  Referent Organizations and the Development of Inter-Organizational Domains , 1983 .

[28]  Robert Agranoff,et al.  Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers , 2006 .

[29]  Stephen Page,et al.  Entrepreneurial Strategies for Managing Interagency Collaboration , 2003 .

[30]  D. C. Sutton Making strategy: the journey of strategic management , 2001 .

[31]  K. Provan,et al.  Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness , 2007 .

[32]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[33]  R. Lasker,et al.  Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. , 2001, The Milbank quarterly.

[34]  L. O'toole Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration , 1997 .

[35]  Chris Huxham,et al.  Contrary Prescriptions: Recognizing Good Practice Tensions in Management , 2003 .

[36]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[37]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[38]  Angel Saz-Carranza,et al.  The Behavioral Dimension of Governing Interorganizational Goal-Directed Networks—Managing the Unity-Diversity Tension , 2011 .

[39]  G. W. England Organizational Goals and Expected Behavior of American Managers , 1967 .

[40]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks , 1999 .

[41]  Dorothy M. Daley Interdisciplinary Problems and Agency Boundaries: Exploring Effective Cross-Agency Collaboration , 2009 .

[42]  Douglas G. Birdsall Handbook of organization studies , 1998 .

[43]  C. Hardy Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems , 1983 .

[44]  C. Huxham,et al.  Use Matters … and Matters of Use , 2011 .

[45]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development , 2007 .

[46]  C. Huxham,et al.  Doing things collaboratively: realizing the advantage or succumbing to inertia? , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[47]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[48]  James F. Wilson,et al.  INCENTIVE SYSTEMS: A THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1961 .

[49]  J. Bryson,et al.  The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature , 2006 .