Methods for measuring the citations and productivity of scientists across time and discipline.

Publication statistics are ubiquitous in the ratings of scientific achievement, with citation counts and paper tallies factoring into an individual's consideration for postdoctoral positions, junior faculty, and tenure. Citation statistics are designed to quantify individual career achievement, both at the level of a single publication, and over an individual's entire career. While some academic careers are defined by a few significant papers (possibly out of many), other academic careers are defined by the cumulative contribution made by the author's publications to the body of science. Several metrics have been formulated to quantify an individual's publication career, yet none of these metrics account for the collaboration group size, and the time dependence of citation counts. In this paper we normalize publication metrics in order to achieve a universal framework for analyzing and comparing scientific achievement across both time and discipline. We study the publication careers of individual authors over the 50-year period 1958-2008 within six high-impact journals: CELL, the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), Nature, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (PNAS), Physical Review Letters (PRL), and Science. Using the normalized metrics (i) "citation shares" to quantify scientific success, and (ii) "paper shares" to quantify scientific productivity, we compare the career achievement of individual authors within each journal, where each journal represents a local arena for competition. We uncover quantifiable statistical regularity in the probability density function of scientific achievement in all journals analyzed, which suggests that a fundamental driving force underlying scientific achievement is the competitive nature of scientific advancement.

[1]  E. Andrade.  Contemporary Physics , 1945, Nature.

[2]  William Shockley,et al.  On the Statistics of Individual Variations of Productivity in Research Laboratories , 1957, Proceedings of the IRE.

[3]  M. Gell-Mann,et al.  Physics Today. , 1966, Applied optics.

[4]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[5]  Derek de Solla Price,et al.  A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes , 1976, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Sidney Redner,et al.  Random multiplicative processes: An elementary tutorial , 1990 .

[7]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[8]  D. Saad.  Europhysics Letters , 1997 .

[9]  D. Sornette.  Multiplicative processes and power laws , 1997, cond-mat/9708231.

[10]  John C. Huber.  Cumulative advantage and success-breeds-success: the value of time pattern analysis , 1998, KDD 1998.

[11]  D. Sornette,et al.  Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “fat tails” with characteristic scales , 1998, cond-mat/9801293.

[12]  S. Redner.  How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution , 1998, cond-mat/9804163.

[13]  R. Mantegna,et al.  An Introduction to Econophysics: Contents , 1999 .

[14]  Rosario N. Mantegna,et al.  Book Review: An Introduction to Econophysics, Correlations, and Complexity in Finance, N. Rosario, H. Mantegna, and H. E. Stanley, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. , 2000 .

[15]  L. Amaral,et al.  The web of human sexual contacts , 2001, Nature.

[16]  S. Redner,et al.  Organization of growing random networks. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[18]  J. Davies.  The individual success of musicians, like that of physicists, follows a stretched exponential distribution , 2002 .

[19]  W. Reed,et al.  From gene families and genera to incomes and internet file sizes: why power laws are so common in nature. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Petter Holme,et al.  Structure and time evolution of an Internet dating community , 2002, Soc. Networks.

[21]  Sitabhra Sinha,et al.  Hollywood blockbusters and long-tailed distributions: An empirical study of the popularity of movies , 2004 .

[22]  M. Newman.  Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[23]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]／Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[24]  José R. Campanha,et al.  Power-law distributions for the citation index of scientific publications and scientists , 2005 .

[25]  S. Redner.  Citation statistics from 110 years of physical review , 2005, physics/0506056.

[26]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[27]  Mônica G. Campiteli,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research valid across disciplines , 2005 .

[28]  J. Hirsch.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific output , 2005 .

[29]  John C. Huber,et al.  Inventive productivity and the statistics of exceedances , 1999, Scientometrics.

[30]  Renio S. Mendes,et al.  Scaling behavior in the dynamics of citations to scientific journals , 2006 .

[31]  Mônica G. Campiteli,et al.  Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? , 2006, Scientometrics.

[32]  Fredrik Liljeros,et al.  Preferential attachment in sexual networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Juan E. Iglesias,et al.  Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields , 2006, Scientometrics.

[34]  Woo-Sung Jung,et al.  On the Distribution of Career Longevity and the Evolution of Home Run Prowess in Professional Baseball , 2008 .

[35]  Claudio Castellano,et al.  Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  M. Sales-Pardo,et al.  Effectiveness of Journal Ranking Schemes as a Tool for Locating Information , 2008, PloS one.

[37]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Promise and Pitfalls of Extending Google's PageRank Algorithm to Citation Networks , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[39]  Bhaskar Mukherjee,et al.  Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2000—2007): a bibliometric study , 2009 .

[40]  R. Rosenfeld.  Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[41]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[42]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Modeling a century of citation distributions , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[44]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[45]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Differences in impact factor across fields and over time , 2009 .

[46]  Woo-Sung Jung,et al.  Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in a study of career longevity , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.