Sex Bias at Work: The Effects of Attentional and Memory Demands on Performance Ratings of Men and Women1

The present study examined the impact of attentional and memory demands on work performance ratings accorded men and women in traditionally male jobs. Of interest was whether sex discrimination would abate in the face of individuating and job-relevant work behavior even when the demands likely to be faced in actual work settings were taken into account. Two hundred and two subjects read a vignette depicting the work behavior of a male or female police officer and then rated the individual's work performance. The attentional demands imposed on subjects while reading the vignette and the amount of time elapsed prior to issuing the performance ratings were systematically varied. As predicted, men were evaluated more favorably than women when raters were faced with an additional task requiring attention and time pressures were made salient. Only when subjects were able to carefully allocate all of their attentional resources did sex bias in work performance ratings abate. Memory demands had no effects on work performance ratings. Gender-related work characterizations paralleled the performance ratings, providing support for the idea that sex stereotypes mediate discrimination in performance appraisal judgments. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings, as well as suggestions for future research, are discussed.

[1]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Examining the role of intent: Toward understanding its role in stereotyping and prejudice. , 1989 .

[2]  Cognitive aspects of prejudice. , 1969 .

[3]  Douglas T. Hall,et al.  Effects of Job Incumbents' Race and Sex of Evaluations of Managerial Performance , 1976 .

[4]  J. Darley,et al.  A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. , 1983 .

[5]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  Exposure to successful women: Antidote to sex discrimination in applicant screening decisions? , 1986 .

[6]  Peter Wright.  The harassed decision maker: Time pressures, distractions, and the use of evidence. , 1974 .

[7]  D. Carlston,et al.  Consequences of schemata for attention, impressions, and recall in complex social interactions. , 1983 .

[8]  K. Murphy,et al.  Effect of purpose of observation on accuracy of immediate and delayed performance ratings , 1989 .

[9]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? , 1989 .

[10]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Social stereotypes and information-processing strategies: the impact of task complexity. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  K. Murphy,et al.  Evaluating the Performance of Paper People , 1986 .

[12]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[13]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[14]  Kenneth M. Alvares,et al.  Effects of sex on descriptions and evaluations of supervisory behavior in a simulated industrial setting. , 1977 .

[15]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  Sex bias in work settings: The Lack of Fit model. , 1983 .

[16]  J. S. Phillips.  The accuracy of leadership ratings: A cognitive categorization perspective☆ , 1984 .

[17]  M. Heilman,et al.  Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. , 1989 .

[18]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[19]  Robert L. Heneman,et al.  The Effects of Time Delay in Rating and Amount of Information Observed on Performance Rating Accuracy , 1983 .

[20]  Cynthia Nelson,et al.  What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions , 1988 .

[21]  Robert J. Wherry,et al.  THE CONTROL OF BIAS IN RATINGS: A THEORY OF RATING , 1982 .

[22]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Managerial Response to Changing Environments: Perspectives on Problem Sensing from Social Cognition. , 1982 .

[23]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. , 1991 .

[24]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  The goal of forming accurate impressions during social interactions: attenuating the impact of negative expectancies. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Identifying Victims of Groupthink From Public Statements of Decision Makers , 1979 .

[26]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Performance appraisal: A process focus. , 1983 .

[27]  R. Helmreich,et al.  Masculinity & femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents , 1978 .

[28]  H. Tajfel.  Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[29]  Andres Inn,et al.  Nonperformance influences on performance evaluations: A laboratory phenomenon? , 1981 .

[30]  Donal E. Carlston,et al.  The recall and use of traits and events in social inference processes , 1980 .

[31]  R. Hastie,et al.  The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line , 1986 .

[32]  K. Deaux.  From individual differences to social categories: analysis of a decade's research on gender , 1984 .

[33]  G. Āllport.  The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[34]  J. Schofield,et al.  Racial and Behavioral Cues in Black and White Children's Perceptions of Ambiguously Aggressive Acts , 1980 .

[35]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[36]  B. Gutek,et al.  Sex Effects on Evaluation , 1980 .

[37]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Motivational Influences on Impression Formation: Outcome Dependency, Accuracy-Driven Attention, and Individuating Processes , 1987 .

[38]  M. Posner.  Cumulative Development of Attentional Theory. , 1982 .

[39]  R. W. Griffeth,et al.  The impact of sex-role stereotypes on performance ratings and causal attributions of performance , 1985 .

[40]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  The dynamics of implicit theories of group performance: When and how do they operate? , 1991 .

[41]  N. Anderson.  Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  Elaine J. Eisenman,et al.  Effects of previous performance on evaluations of present performance. , 1985 .

[43]  Henry Mintzberg.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974, Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977).

[44]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Perceiver-Induced Constraint: Interpretations of Self-Generated Reality , 1986 .

[45]  D. Gilbert,et al.  On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. , 1988 .

[46]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  Cognitive categorization and dimensional schemata: A process approach to the study of halo in performance ratings. , 1983 .

[47]  Eugene Borgida,et al.  Sex stereotypes and social judgment , 1980 .

[48]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Beyond Attribution Theory: Cognitive Processes in Performance Appraisal , 1981 .

[49]  Ben E. Dowell,et al.  Development of a work behavior taxonomy for first-line supervisors. , 1978 .

[50]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  The Effects of the Type and Amount of Information in Sex Discrimination Research: A Meta-Analysis , 1985 .

[51]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  The role of control processes and structural constraints in models of memory and social judgment , 1983 .

[52]  W. Balzer.  Biases in the recording of performance-related information: The effects of initial impression and centrality of the appraisal task , 1986 .

[53]  Anne Locksley,et al.  Social stereotypes and judgments of individuals: An instance of the base-rate fallacy , 1982 .

[54]  J. Terborg,et al.  Women in management: A research review. , 1977 .

[55]  H. Zur,et al.  The effect of time pressure on risky choice behavior , 1981 .

[56]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation , 1990 .

[57]  A. Denisi,et al.  The effect of performance appraisal salience on recall and ratings , 1990 .

[58]  J. S. Phillips,et al.  Effects of a temporal delay in rating on leader behavior descriptions: A laboratory investigation. , 1981 .

[59]  C. Judd,et al.  Overlooking the incongruent: Categorization biases in the identification of political statements. , 1983 .

[60]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[61]  D. Ilgen,et al.  The Effects of Ratee Prototypicality on Rater Observation and Accuracy1 , 1989 .