Initial results of in vivo high-resolution morphological and biochemical cartilage imaging of patients after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) of the ankle

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to use morphological as well as biochemical (T2 and T2* relaxation times and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of healthy cartilage and cartilage repair tissue after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) of the ankle joint.Materials and methodsTen healthy volunteers (mean age, 32.4 years) and 12 patients who underwent MACT of the ankle joint (mean age, 32.8 years) were included. In order to evaluate possible maturation effects, patients were separated into short-term (6–13 months) and long-term (20–54 months) follow-up cohorts. MRI was performed on a 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) scanner using a new dedicated eight-channel foot-and-ankle coil. Using high-resolution morphological MRI, the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score was assessed. For biochemical MRI, T2 mapping, T2* mapping, and DWI were obtained. Region-of-interest analysis was performed within native cartilage of the volunteers and control cartilage as well as cartilage repair tissue in the patients subsequent to MACT.ResultsThe overall MOCART score in patients after MACT was 73.8. T2 relaxation times (~50 ms), T2* relaxation times (~16 ms), and the diffusion constant for DWI (~1.3) were comparable for the healthy volunteers and the control cartilage in the patients after MACT. The cartilage repair tissue showed no significant difference in T2 and T2* relaxation times (p ≥ 0.05) compared to the control cartilage; however, a significantly higher diffusivity (~1.5; p < 0.05) was noted in the cartilage repair tissue.ConclusionThe obtained results suggest that besides morphological MRI and biochemical MR techniques, such as T2 and T2* mapping, DWI may also deliver additional information about the ultrastructure of cartilage and cartilage repair tissue in the ankle joint using high-field MRI, a dedicated multichannel coil, and sophisticated sequences.

[1]  A. Ba-Ssalamah,et al.  Matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair: noninvasive monitoring by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Articular cartilage defects detected with 3D water-excitation true FISP: prospective comparison with sequences commonly used for knee imaging. , 2007, Radiology.

[3]  Wilhelm Horger,et al.  Quantitative T2 Mapping of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation at 3 Tesla: An In Vivo Cross-Sectional Study , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[4]  Dominik Weishaupt,et al.  Muskuloskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives , 2006, European Radiology.

[5]  T. Mosher,et al.  Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications. , 2004, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[6]  S. Roberts,et al.  Early results of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the talus. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  Michael P Recht,et al.  MRI of articular cartilage: revisiting current status and future directions. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Siegfried Trattnig,et al.  Quantitative T2 mapping during follow‐up after matrix‐associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT): Full‐thickness and zonal evaluation to visualize the maturation of cartilage repair tissue , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  V J Schmithorst,et al.  Spatial variation in cartilage T2 of the knee , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  L. Hangody,et al.  Autologous Osteochondral Mosaicplasty for the Treatment of Full-Thickness Defects of Weight-Bearing Joints: Ten Years of Experimental and Clinical Experience , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Georg Langs,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging for the follow-up of patients after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[12]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  In Vivo Biochemical 7.0 Tesla Magnetic Resonance: Preliminary Results of dGEMRIC, Zonal T2, and T2* Mapping of Articular Cartilage , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[13]  Jörg Haller,et al.  Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) for the evaluation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation: determination of interobserver variability and correlation to clinical outcome after 2 years. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[14]  S. Majumdar,et al.  T2 relaxation time of cartilage at MR imaging: comparison with severity of knee osteoarthritis. , 2004, Radiology.

[15]  Michael Weber,et al.  High-resolution morphological and biochemical imaging of articular cartilage of the ankle joint at 3.0 T using a new dedicated phased array coil: in vivo reproducibility study , 2008, Skeletal Radiology.

[16]  G. Guillot,et al.  Evaluation of cartilage repair tissue after biomaterial implantation in rat patella by using T2 mapping , 2004, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[17]  M. Menzel,et al.  Steady-state diffusion imaging for MR in-vivo evaluation of reparative cartilage after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation at 3 tesla--preliminary results. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[18]  J C Gore,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted imaging in tissues: Theoretical models , 1995, NMR in biomedicine.

[19]  S. Trattnig,et al.  T 2-star Relaxation as a means to diffrentiatie Cartilage Repair Tissue after Microfracturing Therapy , 2007 .

[20]  Peter P Koch,et al.  Internal knee derangement assessed with 3-minute three-dimensional isovoxel true FISP MR sequence: preliminary study. , 2008, Radiology.

[21]  Siegfried Trattnig,et al.  Cartilage T2 assessment at 3-T MR imaging: in vivo differentiation of normal hyaline cartilage from reparative tissue after two cartilage repair procedures--initial experience. , 2008, Radiology.

[22]  J Silvennoinen,et al.  T2 relaxation reveals spatial collagen architecture in articular cartilage: A comparative quantitative MRI and polarized light microscopic study , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  S. Giannini,et al.  Arthroscopic Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus , 2008, The American journal of sports medicine.

[24]  Yi Liu,et al.  Change in knee cartilage T2 at MR imaging after running: a feasibility study. , 2005, Radiology.

[25]  Oliver Bieri,et al.  Magnetization transfer contrast and T2 mapping in the evaluation of cartilage repair tissue with 3T MRI , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  J. Pauly,et al.  Steady‐state diffusion‐weighted imaging of in vivo knee cartilage , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Hisham A Alhadlaq,et al.  Orientational dependence of T2 relaxation in articular cartilage: A microscopic MRI (μMRI) study , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  J. Affeldt,et al.  The feasibility study , 2019, The Information System Consultant’s Handbook.

[29]  Jennifer S Wayne,et al.  MR imaging of normal and matrix-depleted cartilage: correlation with biomechanical function and biochemical composition. , 2003, Radiology.

[30]  Herwig Imhof,et al.  Definition of pertinent parameters for the evaluation of articular cartilage repair tissue with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, European journal of radiology.

[31]  Bing Li,et al.  Quantitative and topographical evaluation of ankle articular cartilage using high resolution MRI , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[32]  H. Potter,et al.  MR imaging of cartilage repair in the knee and ankle. , 2008, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[33]  B. J. Murphy.  Evaluation of grades 3 and 4 chondromalacia of the knee using T2*-weighted 3D gradient-echo articular cartilage imaging , 2001, Skeletal Radiology.

[34]  S. Marlovits,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of cartilage repair tissue of the patella and medial femoral condyle by using morphological MRI and biochemical zonal T2 mapping , 2009, European Radiology.

[35]  S. Trattnig,et al.  T2 mapping and dGEMRIC after autologous chondrocyte implantation with a fibrin-based scaffold in the knee: preliminary results. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[36]  George Tomlinson,et al.  Cartilage T2 assessment: differentiation of normal hyaline cartilage and reparative tissue after arthroscopic cartilage repair in equine subjects. , 2006, Radiology.

[37]  S. Trattnig,et al.  T2 mapping in the knee after microfracture at 3.0 T: correlation of global T2 values and clinical outcome - preliminary results. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[38]  J. Dunn,et al.  Micro-imaging of articular cartilage: T2, proton density, and the magic angle effect. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[39]  K. T. Scott,et al.  Protocol issues for delayed Gd(DTPA)2–‐enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for clinical evaluation of articular cartilage , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[40]  S. Marlovits,et al.  MR imaging of osteochondral grafts and autologous chondrocyte implantation , 2006, European Radiology.

[41]  Karla L Miller,et al.  Nonlinear phase correction for navigated diffusion imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[42]  V. Mlynárik,et al.  Investigation of apparent diffusion constant as an indicator of early degenerative disease in articular cartilage , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[43]  Wilhelm Horger,et al.  Diagnosis of articular cartilage abnormalities of the knee: prospective clinical evaluation of a 3D water-excitation true FISP sequence. , 2007, Radiology.

[44]  M. Cova,et al.  Fast T2 mapping of the patellar articular cartilage with gradient and spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T: validation and initial clinical experience in patients with osteoarthritis , 2008, Skeletal Radiology.

[45]  Bruce C. Po,et al.  Glycosaminoglycan distribution in cartilage as determined by delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC): potential clinical applications. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[46]  R. Ramnath.  3T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system (Part II): clinical applications. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[47]  D. Burstein,et al.  Is MRI fulfilling its promise for molecular imaging of cartilage in arthritis? , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[48]  T. Mosher.  Musculoskeletal imaging at 3T: current techniques and future applications. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[49]  Christian Glaser,et al.  New techniques for cartilage imaging: T2 relaxation time and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. , 2005, Radiologic clinics of North America.